Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$2.51
▼ $0.01 (-0.4%)
Market data updated: 09/21 09:59 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/21/2026
News analyzed: 09/21/2026
Market Cap
$27.01M
Day Range
$2.48 - $2.58
52-Week Range
$2.35 - $3.14
Beta
—
Next Earnings
10.11.2026
Support
$2.48
Resistance
$3.10
CRWS is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-13.4% (1Y)
Strengths: 11/32 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $9.92 vs. price $2.51 (+295.3%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is eroding over time
Quality
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
49
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
54
Quality
47
Value
72
Momentum
14
Risk
54
Sentiment
86
Fundamental
51
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Crown Crafts, Inc. (CRWS) has centered on its **Q1 2027 earnings report**, highlighting a strong financial rebound. The company posted a **290% increase in earnings per share** (from a loss of $0.10 to $0.19) alongside **year-over-year sales growth** (from $15.48M to $16.77M). Analysts noted positive trends despite a slight stock decline post-earnings, attributing gains to operational improvements and market recovery. No other major developments were widely reported.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Crown Crafts, Inc.. News trend score: 86. Reason: 7 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
27
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
38
Psychology
76
Fundamentals
51
Technical
14
Valuation
72
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-10%
Market Narrative
37
Fundamental Reality
38
Narrative Gap
-1
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests **herding** dominates as CRWS underperformed peers, signaling relative underperformance-driven alignment. Low FOMO (score 8) and muted volume (0.64x avg) imply limited urgency, while anchoring (4.4% above support) hints at traders waiting for confirmation. The narrative gap (-3) suggests slight optimism over reality, but negative momentum (-7.8% ROC) and valuation (-73% vs. DCF) ground expectations. The key question: *Will underperformance persist, or will traders pivot if support holds?*
Updated: 09/07/2026, 05:14 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"reported $16.766 million in sales (up YoY) but EPS swung from $(0.10) to $0.19 (290% increase from loss)"
"EPS $0.19 up from $(0.10) YoY, marking a significant turnaround"
"stock gains following Q4 earnings, margin expands"
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 98/100
🔴 Weakest match
Philip Fisher — 7/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The highest scores from Samuel Armstrong Nelson, Benjamin Graham (Defensive) and Walter Bagehot—98, 90 and 86—reflect a view that the stock sits in a favorable cycle, offers defensive value and strong liquidity, so the model estimates a generally positive outlook. Mid‑range scores from Jack Schwager, Graham (Enterprising), Peter Lynch, Howard Marks and Thorstein Veblen (71‑76) highlight disciplined reward‑to‑risk setups, growth not yet priced in and reasonably priced risk, leading to a cautiously optimistic assessment. Lower scores from Burton Malkiel & John Bogle, Morgan Housel, Jesse Livermore and Philip Fisher (7‑50) point to weak index‑relative evidence, volatility that may deter patient investors, a negative price trend and insufficient quality, producing a more skeptical view. Consequently, while many methodologies agree the stock shows relative strength, they diverge on how much risk and growth potential they are willing to accept, resulting in a spectrum of conclusions.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 98
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 91
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 86
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 84
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 81
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 76
Deep statistical discount — a real Enterprising Investor candidate
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 74
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 72
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 65
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 65
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 59
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 57
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 52
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 32
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 29
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 7
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 283 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 11 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
24.4%
Operating Margin
1.3%
Net Margin
2.2%
EBITDA Margin
1.3%
ROE
4.7%
ROA
2.6%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.17
Cash
$200.00K
Total Debt
$14.12M
Current Ratio
3.58
Debt/Equity
0.36
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 11.9.2026 | $0.030 |
| 11.6.2026 | $0.080 |
| 10.6.2026 | $0.080 |
| 13.3.2026 | $0.080 |
| 12.3.2026 | $0.080 |
| 12.12.2025 | $0.080 |
| 11.12.2025 | $0.080 |
| 12.9.2025 | $0.080 |
| 11.9.2025 | $0.080 |
| 13.6.2025 | $0.080 |
| 12.6.2025 | $0.080 |
| 14.3.2025 | $0.080 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$2.51
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$9.92
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+295.3%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
3.5%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.5% | $7.67M | $7.04M |
| 2 | 3.3% | $7.92M | $6.67M |
| 3 | 3.0% | $8.16M | $6.30M |
| 4 | 2.8% | $8.39M | $5.94M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $8.60M | $5.59M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$7.41M
Terminal Value
$135.54M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$88.09M
Enterprise Value
$119.63M
Net Debt
$13.92M
Equity Value
$105.70M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$3.64
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$3.05
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 7 positive, 12 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Benzinga · 8.9.2026
Motley Fool · 19.8.2026
Zacks · 19.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.8.2026
Moby · 13.8.2026
Associated Press · 12.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 12.8.2026
Benzinga · 12.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 5.8.2026
Zacks · 4.8.2026
Zacks · 3.8.2026
Zacks · 20.7.2026
Zacks · 29.6.2026
Moby · 25.6.2026
GuruFocus.com · 24.6.2026
InvestorsHub · 24.6.2026
Associated Press · 24.6.2026
GlobeNewswire · 24.6.2026
GlobeNewswire · 17.6.2026
GlobeNewswire · 14.5.2026
Crown Crafts, Inc. (CRWS) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 49/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
CRWS currently scores 49/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, CRWS's estimated fair value is $9.92, which is 295.3% above the current price of $2.51. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
CRWS's technical score is 14/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $9.92 vs. price $2.51 (+295.3%); SMA 50 recently crossed above SMA 200; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 118.9%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is eroding over time; Calmar: -0.35 (3y annualized return -20.2% / max drawdown 57.5%); Revenue growth (last year): -5.7%.
Yes — CRWS has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 8 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIE ZENON S | Gift | 13.8.2026 | 34,944 | -34,944 | — |
| Ferreira Tatiana Gancev | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.8.2026 | 33,546 | +33,546 | — |
| NIE ZENON S | Gift | 13.8.2026 | 34,944 | +34,944 | — |
| NIE ZENON S | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.8.2026 | 33,546 | +33,546 | — |
| DUARTE IXCHELL | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.8.2026 | 33,546 | +33,546 | — |
| BENSTOCK MICHAEL | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.8.2026 | 33,546 | +33,546 | — |
| BENSTOCK MICHAEL | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.8.2026 | 103,887 | +33,546 | — |
| NIE ZENON S | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.8.2026 | 128,490 | +33,546 | — |
| NIE ZENON S | Gift | 13.8.2026 | 93,546 | -34,944 | — |
| NIE ZENON S | Gift | 13.8.2026 | 244,452 | +34,944 | — |
| Ferreira Tatiana Gancev | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.8.2026 | 33,546 | +33,546 | — |
| Spencer Claire K. | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.3.2026 | 10,000 | +10,000 | — |
| Spencer Claire K. | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.3.2026 | 25,000 | +10,000 | — |
| RATAJCZAK DONALD R | Open Market Purchase | 19.11.2025 | 5,000 | +5,000 | $2.70 |
| RATAJCZAK DONALD R | Open Market Purchase | 19.11.2025 | 336,181 | +5,000 | $2.70 |
| RATAJCZAK DONALD R | Open Market Purchase | 17.11.2025 | 10,000 | +10,000 | $2.80 |
| RATAJCZAK DONALD R | Open Market Purchase | 17.11.2025 | 331,181 | +10,000 | $2.80 |
| RATAJCZAK DONALD R | Open Market Purchase | 14.11.2025 | 10,000 | +10,000 | $2.69 |
| RATAJCZAK DONALD R | Open Market Purchase | 14.11.2025 | 321,181 | +10,000 | $2.69 |
| RATAJCZAK DONALD R | Open Market Purchase | 13.11.2025 | 10,000 | +10,000 | $2.75 |
| RATAJCZAK DONALD R | Open Market Purchase | 13.11.2025 | 311,181 | +10,000 | $2.75 |
| NIE ZENON S | Gift | 18.8.2025 | 20,294 | +20,294 | — |
| NIE ZENON S | Gift | 18.8.2025 | 20,294 | -20,294 | — |
| NIE ZENON S | Gift | 18.8.2025 | 94,944 | -20,294 | — |
| NIE ZENON S | Gift | 18.8.2025 | 209,508 | +20,294 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
30,017 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 29,866 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
40.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 40.6% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology