Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$408.12
▲ $1.41 (+0.3%)
Market data updated: 09/19 02:40 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/18/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$20.23B
Day Range
$399.08 - $411.67
52-Week Range
$228.00 - $625.99
Beta
—
Next Earnings
21.10.2026
Support
$395.00
Resistance
$612.78
CRS is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
+65.4% (1Y)
Strengths: 13/29 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 41.8%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 4.7% of price
Risk
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (68/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (45/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
55
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
68
Quality
63
Value
45
Momentum
9
Risk
62
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
80
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **Carpenter Technology Corporation** has primarily focused on its stock valuation and long-term performance. Analysts note that while the company has delivered strong share price gains over the past five years, its current stock price is considered fully valued or fairly priced, prompting investors to weigh past returns against its present market positioning. No direct company-specific news beyond valuation discussions was found in the provided sources.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Carpenter Technology Corporation. News trend score: 100. Reason: 14 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
35
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
55
Fundamentals
80
Technical
9
Valuation
45
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-30%
Market Narrative
53
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+11
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
CRS’s psychology is fragmented, with no single dominant state but elevated FOMO (23) and Panic Selling (30) tied to extreme sentiment (100/100) despite weak momentum (-6.8% ROC). Herding (28) reflects peer underperformance, while anchoring (22) hints at support proximity. The narrative-reality gap (14) suggests traders may overestimate positive catalysts. The key question: *Is the sentiment-driven volume masking true selling pressure or a delayed reaction to negative momentum?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 04:49 AM
👥 What the crowd believes
"Carpenter Technology has delivered extremely strong long term share price gains, yet the current checks suggest the stock now trades at a premium on several fronts"
📈 16D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 99/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 30/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s starkly divided verdicts reflect deep methodological disagreements about risk, timing, and valuation. The highest-scoring approaches—Bagehot’s liquidity focus, Schwager’s disciplined trading setup, and Nelson’s cycle analysis—all suggest resilience or favorable entry points, emphasizing stability or oversold conditions. In contrast, Graham’s strict defensive criteria and Livermore’s trend-following rule outright reject the stock, while Fisher and the efficient-market camp see it as merely solid or unexceptional. Marks’ mixed verdict highlights a tension between its business fundamentals and already elevated expectations, while Lynch and Veblen’s growth-oriented scores imply undervaluation relative to earnings potential. The divide underscores whether the stock’s strengths lie in defensive resilience, cyclical timing, or speculative growth—versus its perceived overvaluation or trend resistance.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 99
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 97
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 83
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 79
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 76
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 76
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 74
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 71
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 63
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 58
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 58
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 53
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 40
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 40
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 30
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 282 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 10 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
30.6%
Operating Margin
22.5%
Net Margin
17.0%
EBITDA Margin
27.2%
ROE
23.8%
ROA
13.8%
ROIC
—
EPS
$10.59
Cash
$393.30M
Total Debt
$690.70M
Current Ratio
3.81
Debt/Equity
0.31
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 25.8.2026 | $0.200 |
| 28.4.2026 | $0.200 |
| 27.4.2026 | $0.200 |
| 27.1.2026 | $0.200 |
| 26.1.2026 | $0.200 |
| 21.10.2025 | $0.200 |
| 20.10.2025 | $0.200 |
| 26.8.2025 | $0.200 |
| 25.8.2025 | $0.200 |
| 22.4.2025 | $0.200 |
| 21.4.2025 | $0.200 |
| 28.1.2025 | $0.200 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$44.20
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$39.61
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 14 positive, 3 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Zacks · 11.9.2026
Zacks · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Zacks · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Zacks · 10.9.2026
Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 55/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
CRS currently scores 55/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
CRS's technical score is 9/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 41.8%; Net income growth: 40.9%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 4.7% of price; Price is below the 50-day average; Price is below the 200-day average.
Yes — CRS has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 23 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KAROL STEVEN E | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.9.2026 | 3,275 | +3,275 | $39.79 |
| KAROL STEVEN E | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.9.2026 | 3,275 | -3,275 | — |
| KAROL STEVEN E | Open Market Sale | 4.9.2026 | 3,275 | -3,275 | $474.08 |
| Thene Tony R | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 76,213 | -2,251 | $488.67 |
| Thene Tony R | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 73,961 | -2,252 | $487.21 |
| Thene Tony R | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 78,464 | -429 | $489.33 |
| Thene Tony R | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 67,835 | -6,126 | $486.35 |
| Thene Tony R | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 34,106 | -4,622 | $481.30 |
| Thene Tony R | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 38,728 | -8,372 | $482.27 |
| Thene Tony R | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 492,622 | -2,370 | $487.85 |
| Thene Tony R | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 27,786 | -6,320 | $480.34 |
| Thene Tony R | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 47,100 | -5,818 | $483.27 |
| Thene Tony R | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 490,627 | -1,995 | $486.59 |
| Thene Tony R | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 27,066 | -720 | $479.49 |
| Thene Tony R | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 494,992 | -2,095 | $488.74 |
| Thene Tony R | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 59,971 | -7,864 | $485.17 |
| Thene Tony R | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 52,918 | -7,053 | $484.35 |
| Thene Tony R | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 480,623 | -10,004 | $485.71 |
| Thene Tony R | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 452,270 | -8,383 | $482.58 |
| Thene Tony R | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 446,470 | -5,800 | $481.61 |
| Thene Tony R | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 460,653 | -8,071 | $483.61 |
| Thene Tony R | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 439,631 | -1,890 | $479.89 |
| Thene Tony R | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 441,521 | -4,949 | $480.46 |
| Thene Tony R | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 468,724 | -11,899 | $484.61 |
| Thene Tony R | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 7,864 | -7,864 | $485.17 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,501,299 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 2,437,984 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
51.5% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 62.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology