Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$5.81
▲ $0.17 (+3.0%)
Market data updated: 09/23 02:30 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/23/2026
News analyzed: 09/23/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$5.67 - $5.83
52-Week Range
$3.74 - $6.90
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.11.2026
Support
$4.25
Resistance
$6.27
CRCT is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
-17.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 14/26 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 20.7%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is eroding over time
Quality
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
65
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
60
Quality
42
Value
50
Momentum
65
Risk
48
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
76
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Cricut, Inc. has centered on its stock performance and a major product launch. Analysts upgraded Cricut (CRCT) to a "Strong Buy," citing optimism over earnings growth and placing it on multiple Zacks Rank #1 lists for momentum and income stocks. Additionally, Cricut announced the Cricut Maker 5, its newest smart cutting machine, highlighting advanced features like expanded material compatibility and a sleeker design.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Cricut, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 13 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
30
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
36
Psychology
45
Fundamentals
76
Technical
65
Valuation
50
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+30%
Market Narrative
62
Fundamental Reality
36
Narrative Gap
+26
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
CRCT’s psychology score suggests a dominant narrative-driven bias, with euphoria and confirmation bias as the most pronounced states. The stock’s momentum and distance above its 200-day average align with euphoric overvaluation, while the narrative gap—despite flat fundamentals—indicates investors may be cherry-picking positive signals. Overconfidence in price momentum over fundamentals further reinforces this. The key question is whether the disconnect between narrative and reality will persist or if fundamentals will eventually reassert themselves. The absence of panic or herding suggests no immediate liquidity crisis, but the lack of volume relative to momentum could signal cautious participation rather than broad enthusiasm.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 04:50 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Cricut (CRCT) upgraded to Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) momentum stocks list on September 3, 2026."
"Cricut® Introduces Cricut Maker® 5, its most versatile smart cutting machine yet."
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 80/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 14/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The methodologies for CRCT split sharply between bullish and cautious signals, reflecting starkly different priorities. Samuel Armstrong Nelson and Walter Bagehot’s high scores (83 and 80) suggest favorable cyclical positioning and financial resilience, respectively—both models favoring stocks poised for recovery or liquidity-driven stability. In contrast, Fisher (17) and Housel (0) dismiss the stock outright, with Fisher’s quality-focused approach rejecting its growth profile and Housel’s volatility aversion flagging it as a disruptive risk. The middle ground—where Lynch, Livermore, and even Graham’s stricter tests land—highlights ambiguity: growth exists but may already be priced in, or the stock lacks clear momentum. Marks’ dual verdicts (cycle-neutral and risk-averse) further underscore the tension between cyclical optimism and valuation caution, while the efficient-market camp dismisses it as unexceptional. The divide underscores whether one prioritizes speculative upside, defensive resilience, or disciplined fundamentals.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 80
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 62
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 56
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 55
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 51
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 50
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 46
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 46
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 46
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 45
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 44
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 39
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 36
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 34
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 17
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 14
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 282 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (6 bullish · 3 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
55.1%
Operating Margin
13.5%
Net Margin
10.8%
EBITDA Margin
17.0%
ROE
22.3%
ROA
13.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.36
Cash
$256.22M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
2.26
Debt/Equity
—
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 7.7.2026 | $0.100 |
| 6.7.2026 | $0.100 |
| 6.1.2026 | $0.100 |
| 5.1.2026 | $0.100 |
| 7.7.2025 | $0.850 |
| 6.7.2025 | $0.850 |
| 7.1.2025 | $0.100 |
| 6.1.2025 | $0.100 |
| 2.7.2024 | $0.500 |
| 1.7.2024 | $0.500 |
| 30.6.2023 | $1.000 |
| 29.6.2023 | $1.000 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$1.58
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$1.58
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 13 positive, 4 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 22.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Zacks · 9.9.2026
Zacks · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Zacks · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Zacks · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Zacks · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Zacks · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Cricut, Inc. (CRCT) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 65/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
CRCT currently scores 65/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
CRCT's technical score is 65/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 20.7%; Net income growth: 22.1%; Return on equity (ROE): 22.3% — strong.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is eroding over time; Calmar: -0.25 (3y annualized return -14.9% / max drawdown 59.8%); Revenue growth (last year): -0.5%.
Yes — CRCT has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 17 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ashish Arora | Open Market Sale | 4.9.2026 | 60,000 | -60,000 | $5.61 |
| Ashish Arora | Open Market Sale | 3.9.2026 | 60,000 | -60,000 | $5.85 |
| Ashish Arora | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 60,000 | -60,000 | $5.79 |
| Harmer Ryan | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 10,000 | -10,000 | $5.70 |
| Harmer Ryan | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 314,428 | -10,000 | $5.70 |
| Ashish Arora | Conversion of Derivative Security | 19.8.2026 | 1,750,000 | -1,750,000 | — |
| Ashish Arora | Conversion of Derivative Security | 19.8.2026 | 1,750,000 | +1,750,000 | — |
| Ashish Arora | Open Market Sale | 19.8.2026 | 60,000 | -60,000 | $5.48 |
| Ashish Arora | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 60,000 | -60,000 | $5.53 |
| Ashish Arora | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 60,000 | -60,000 | $5.60 |
| Harmer Ryan | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | $6.00 |
| Ashish Arora | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 58,095 | -58,095 | $5.98 |
| Ashish Arora | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 1,905 | -1,905 | $6.26 |
| Ashish Arora | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 4,209,010 | -58,095 | $5.98 |
| Ashish Arora | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 4,207,105 | -1,905 | $6.26 |
| Ashish Arora | Open Market Sale | 4.8.2026 | 60,000 | -60,000 | $4.89 |
| Ashish Arora | Open Market Sale | 4.8.2026 | 4,267,105 | -60,000 | $4.89 |
| Ashish Arora | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 60,000 | -60,000 | $4.77 |
| Ashish Arora | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 4,327,105 | -60,000 | $4.77 |
| REIFF MELISSA | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.7.2026 | 677 | +677 | — |
| Williamson Billie Ida | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.7.2026 | 677 | +677 | — |
| Harmer Ryan | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.7.2026 | 3,849 | +3,849 | — |
| Shill Kimball C | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.7.2026 | 16,897 | +16,897 | — |
| Tuttle Matt | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.7.2026 | 4,884 | +4,884 | — |
| Zak Heidi | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.7.2026 | 2,072 | +2,072 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
4,486,866 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 5,186,580 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
53.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 56.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology