Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Staples · ·
$58.29
▲ $0.31 (+0.5%)
Market data updated: 09/24 06:15 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/23/2026
News analyzed: 09/24/2026
Market Cap
$3.35B
Day Range
$57.19 - $58.81
52-Week Range
$37.63 - $85.83
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
Support
$50.62
Resistance
$79.99
COCO is a stock from the Consumer Defensive sector — Food, beverages, and household products — steady demand even in a recession, since these are essential consumer goods.
+40.5% (1Y)
Strengths: 14/31 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 26.6%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $12.87 vs. price $58.29 (-77.9%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (65/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (33/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
57
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
65
Quality
47
Value
33
Momentum
41
Risk
54
Sentiment
98
Fundamental
74
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of The Vita Coco Company, Inc. highlights its strong financial performance and strategic expansion. The company’s Q2 earnings were noted as standout within the beverages sector, reinforcing its growth trajectory. Additionally, headlines emphasize its innovation push, particularly the successful launch of new product lines like Treats, signaling a shift beyond coconut water to diversify its offerings. Analysts also point to Vita Coco as a momentum stock with potential for explosive upside, though broader industry trends like inflation remain a backdrop.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about The Vita Coco Company, Inc.. News trend score: 98. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
31
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
37
Psychology
51
Fundamentals
74
Technical
41
Valuation
33
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-30%
Market Narrative
81
Fundamental Reality
37
Narrative Gap
+44
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant anchoring behavior (83) reflects traders’ fixation on the 0.8% proximity to support, ignoring broader negative momentum (-16.9%) and valuation extremes (+314%). Overconfidence (45) and loss aversion (43) coexist, as traders may cling to overvalued expectations despite divergence from fundamentals. The narrative gap (29) hints at a disconnect between optimistic sentiment (100/100) and deteriorating technicals. The key question: Will traders break free from the 0.8% anchor, or will loss aversion sustain near-support consolidation?
Updated: 09/09/2026, 12:44 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Vita Coco (NASDAQ:COCO): Strongest Q2 Results from the Beverages, Alcohol, and Tobacco Group"
"COCO's Treats launch gains early traction as the company expands beyond coconut water with innovation-driven growth avenues"
📈 11D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham — 30/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on his documented principles, the model estimates Walter Bagehot would view COCO’s liquidity as very strong (score 100) and see it as likely to survive a credit squeeze, while Morgan Housel’s framework flags the same stock as extremely volatile (score 0), warning patient holders. Jack Schwager’s disciplined risk‑reward lens yields a high score (93), contrasting with Howard Marks’s market‑cycle view that rates it only 74 and notes it is early‑to‑mid cycle, and Marks’s own valuation focus gives a low 38, highlighting the tension between cycle timing and valuation caution. Growth‑oriented thinkers such as Peter Lynch (50) and Philip Fisher (33) find mixed signals, with Lynch seeing growth already priced in and Fisher missing the quality‑growth signature, while crowd‑sentiment analysts like Charles Mackay (65) and Thorstein Veblen (62) detect rising excitement but uncertainty over profit translation. Value‑focused investors like Benjamin Graham (18) and his enterprising variant (31) deem the stock insufficiently cheap, whereas the efficient‑market perspective of Malkiel & Bogle (36) concludes the evidence for out‑performing an index is weak, leading to an overall spread of opinions across the spectrum.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 80
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 68
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 62
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 61
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 60
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 57
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 53
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 46
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 46
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 45
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 43
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 33
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 31
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 30
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 283 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (4 bullish · 6 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
36.5%
Operating Margin
13.5%
Net Margin
11.7%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
21.5%
ROA
15.5%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.25
Cash
$196.87M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
3.62
Debt/Equity
0.00
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$58.29
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$12.87
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-77.9%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
12.7%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12.7% | $43.98M | $40.35M |
| 2 | 10.1% | $48.44M | $40.77M |
| 3 | 7.6% | $52.13M | $40.25M |
| 4 | 5.0% | $54.76M | $38.79M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $56.13M | $36.48M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$39.02M
Terminal Value
$885.08M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$575.24M
Enterprise Value
$771.89M
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$771.89M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$5.81
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$2.52
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 6 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 24.9.2026
Yahoo · 24.9.2026
Yahoo · 24.9.2026
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Zacks · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Zacks · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Zacks · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
StockStory · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Zacks · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Zacks · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Zacks · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Zacks · 16.9.2026
The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 57/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
COCO currently scores 57/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, COCO's estimated fair value is $12.87, which is 77.9% below the current price of $58.29. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
COCO's technical score is 41/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 26.6%; Net income growth: 27.5%; Return on equity (ROE): 21.5% — strong.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $12.87 vs. price $58.29 (-77.9%); Operating margin is eroding over time; ATR: 4.6% of price.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for COCO.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 12 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burth Jonathan | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.8.2026 | 10,801 | -10,801 | $65.21 |
| Prior Jane | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.8.2026 | 10,801 | -10,801 | $65.21 |
| van Es Charles | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.8.2026 | 10,801 | -10,801 | $65.21 |
| Sadowsky Kenneth | Open Market Sale | 17.6.2026 | 3,900 | -3,900 | $82.92 |
| Sadowsky Kenneth | Open Market Sale | 17.6.2026 | 580,296 | -3,900 | $82.92 |
| Liran Ira | Open Market Sale | 12.6.2026 | 73,842 | -73,842 | $80.32 |
| Liran Ira | Open Market Sale | 12.6.2026 | 74,232 | -74,232 | $80.29 |
| Liran Ira | Open Market Sale | 12.6.2026 | 309,871 | -74,232 | $80.29 |
| Liran Ira | Open Market Sale | 12.6.2026 | 402,579 | -73,842 | $80.32 |
| Burth Jonathan | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.6.2026 | 6,425 | +6,425 | $10.18 |
| Burth Jonathan | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.6.2026 | 23,575 | +23,575 | $10.18 |
| Liran Ira | Open Market Sale | 11.6.2026 | 95,768 | -95,768 | $79.14 |
| Burth Jonathan | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.6.2026 | 6,425 | -6,425 | — |
| Burth Jonathan | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.6.2026 | 23,575 | -23,575 | — |
| Liran Ira | Open Market Sale | 11.6.2026 | 96,158 | -96,158 | $79.14 |
| Burth Jonathan | Open Market Sale | 11.6.2026 | 30,000 | -30,000 | $80.00 |
| Burth Jonathan | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.6.2026 | 81,485 | +23,575 | $10.18 |
| Burth Jonathan | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.6.2026 | 87,910 | +6,425 | $10.18 |
| Burth Jonathan | Open Market Sale | 11.6.2026 | 57,910 | -30,000 | $80.00 |
| Burth Jonathan | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.6.2026 | 0 | -23,575 | — |
| Burth Jonathan | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 11.6.2026 | 34,525 | -6,425 | — |
| Liran Ira | Open Market Sale | 11.6.2026 | 384,103 | -95,768 | $79.14 |
| Liran Ira | Open Market Sale | 11.6.2026 | 476,421 | -96,158 | $79.14 |
| Dozie Aishetu Fatima | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 1,530 | +1,530 | $75.18 |
| Zupo John | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.6.2026 | 1,530 | +1,530 | $75.18 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
5,818,461 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 5,340,085 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
80.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 66.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology