Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$27.08
▼ $2.31 (-7.9%)
Market data updated: 09/26 05:18 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/26/2026
News analyzed: 09/26/2026
Market Cap
$1.65B
Day Range
$26.70 - $29.23
52-Week Range
$19.12 - $49.37
Beta
—
Next Earnings
29.09.2026
Support
$21.65
Resistance
$33.84
CNXC is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
-50.8% (1Y)
Strengths: 6/31 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $126.85 vs. price $27.08 (+368.4%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin
Operating margin: -9.3% (negative)
Fundamental
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
46
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
today · $27.08
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from 40 to 4 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
21d ago · $32.16
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 61)
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
48
Quality
42
Value
62
Momentum
50
Risk
28
Sentiment
68
Fundamental
24
Institutional
75
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Concentrix Corporation has primarily centered on its strategic pivot toward artificial intelligence (AI) to drive growth and address challenges in its core business. Highlights include a 400% surge in AI-related bookings, discussions about its generative AI initiatives reshaping enterprise value, and partnerships like the NiCE platform collaboration with Currys, which won an international customer experience award. Analysts also scrutinize its financial fundamentals and profitability amid broader industry comparisons.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Concentrix Corporation. News trend score: 68. Reason: 6 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
9
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
35
Psychology
9
Fundamentals
24
Technical
50
Valuation
62
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
+8%
Market Narrative
39
Fundamental Reality
35
Narrative Gap
+4
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
CNXC’s market behavior suggests a dominant FOMO-driven rally, fueled by extreme momentum, volume spikes, and perfect news sentiment—despite a widening narrative-reality gap (75 vs. 35). The disconnect between overbought technicals (RSI 75, Bollinger %B 0.90) and valuation (-75% DCF) hints at detached euphoria, while overconfidence may stem from momentum decoupling from fundamentals. The key question: *Will traders sustain FOMO despite mounting valuation contradictions?* The absence of herding or anchoring implies this rally is self-reinforcing, not peer-driven.
Updated: 09/05/2026, 01:28 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"AI Bookings Surge 400% as Offshoring Pressures Sales"
"Currys Transforms Customer Engagement with NiCE, Driving Higher NPS and Faster Resolution"
"Concentrix’s (CNXC) Generative AI Playbook Reframing Its Core Enterprise Value Proposition"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 4D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 92/100
🔴 Weakest match
Peter Lynch — 9/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock presents a stark divide between momentum-driven and fundamental/value-oriented methodologies. Jesse Livermore’s high score reflects a strong upward price trend that aligns with his technical, trend-following approach, while Benjamin Graham’s Enterprising Investor framework also sees potential in a statistically discounted valuation—though his stricter criteria leave it as a mixed case. Meanwhile, the majority of value, growth, and cycle-sensitive investors—from Fisher and Lynch to Marks and Loeb—reject it outright, citing weak quality, overvaluation, or excessive risk. Even the efficient-market proponents see little edge, suggesting the stock’s appeal is either speculative or short-term, while behavioral economists like Mackay and Veblen warn of crowd-driven or unsustainable growth patterns.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 92
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 87
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 78
Deep statistical discount — a real Enterprising Investor candidate
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 65
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 63
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 62
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 37
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 36
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 36
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 34
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 31
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 30
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 26
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 17
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 16
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 9
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 287 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (4 bullish · 5 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
35.0%
Operating Margin
-9.3%
Net Margin
-13.0%
EBITDA Margin
-9.3%
ROE
-46.6%
ROA
-11.9%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$20.36
Cash
$327.35M
Total Debt
$4.64B
Current Ratio
1.40
Debt/Equity
1.69
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 24.7.2026 | $0.360 |
| 23.7.2026 | $0.360 |
| 24.4.2026 | $0.360 |
| 23.4.2026 | $0.360 |
| 30.1.2026 | $0.360 |
| 29.1.2026 | $0.360 |
| 24.10.2025 | $0.360 |
| 23.10.2025 | $0.360 |
| 25.7.2025 | $0.333 |
| 24.7.2025 | $0.333 |
| 25.4.2025 | $0.333 |
| 24.4.2025 | $0.333 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$27.08
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$126.85
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+368.4%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
16.6%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16.6% | $667.58M | $612.46M |
| 2 | 13.1% | $754.94M | $635.42M |
| 3 | 9.6% | $827.09M | $638.67M |
| 4 | 6.0% | $876.95M | $621.26M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $898.88M | $584.21M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$572.47M
Terminal Value
$14.17B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$9.21B
Enterprise Value
$12.30B
Net Debt
$4.31B
Equity Value
$7.99B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$43.55
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$45.83
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 6 positive, 11 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Benzinga · 25.9.2026
Yahoo · 23.9.2026
Yahoo · 23.9.2026
Yahoo · 22.9.2026
Benzinga · 21.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Benzinga · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Benzinga · 8.9.2026
Benzinga · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
StockStory · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
Concentrix Corporation (CNXC) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 46/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
CNXC currently scores 46/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, CNXC's estimated fair value is $126.85, which is 368.4% above the current price of $27.08. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
CNXC's technical score is 50/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $126.85 vs. price $27.08 (+368.4%); Free cash flow growth: 33.5%; Price is above the 50-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin: -9.3% (negative); Net margin: -13.0% (negative); Operating margin is eroding over time.
Yes — CNXC has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 6 purchases and 2 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caldwell Christopher A | Open Market Purchase | 8.7.2026 | 1,000 | +1,000 | $21.25 |
| Caldwell Christopher A | Open Market Purchase | 8.7.2026 | 358,382 | +1,000 | $21.25 |
| Groupe Bruxelles Lambert | Open Market Sale | 29.4.2026 | 6,000,000 | -6,000,000 | $22.25 |
| Groupe Bruxelles Lambert | Open Market Sale | 29.4.2026 | 2,773,667 | -6,000,000 | $22.25 |
| Valentine Andre S | Open Market Purchase | 9.4.2026 | 2,500 | +2,500 | $27.95 |
| Valentine Andre S | Open Market Purchase | 9.4.2026 | 89,066 | +2,500 | $27.95 |
| Caldwell Christopher A | Open Market Purchase | 26.3.2026 | 1,000 | +1,000 | $26.97 |
| Caldwell Christopher A | Open Market Purchase | 26.3.2026 | 357,382 | +1,000 | $26.97 |
| Deason Jennifer | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.3.2026 | 7,701 | +7,701 | — |
| Marinello Kathryn V | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.3.2026 | 7,701 | +7,701 | — |
| Cheng Chih-Kai | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.3.2026 | 7,701 | +7,701 | — |
| POLK DENNIS | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.3.2026 | 7,701 | +7,701 | — |
| Hayley Kathryn | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.3.2026 | 7,701 | +7,701 | — |
| Council LaVerne H | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.3.2026 | 7,701 | +7,701 | — |
| VEZINA ANN F | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.3.2026 | 7,701 | +7,701 | — |
| OGUT BILGE | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.3.2026 | 7,701 | +7,701 | — |
| POLK DENNIS | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.3.2026 | 28,924 | +7,701 | — |
| OGUT BILGE | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.3.2026 | 7,701 | +7,701 | — |
| VEZINA ANN F | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.3.2026 | 19,648 | +7,701 | — |
| Marinello Kathryn V | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.3.2026 | 17,704 | +7,701 | — |
| Hayley Kathryn | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.3.2026 | 17,712 | +7,701 | — |
| Deason Jennifer | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.3.2026 | 17,704 | +7,701 | — |
| Council LaVerne H | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.3.2026 | 17,704 | +7,701 | — |
| Cheng Chih-Kai | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.3.2026 | 7,701 | +7,701 | — |
| Valentine Andre S | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.2.2026 | 864 | -864 | $37.35 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
8,590,073 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 9,365,178 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
74.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 61.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology