Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$1.37
▼ $0.08 (-5.5%)
Market data updated: 09/26 04:42 AM
News analyzed: 09/26/2026
Market Cap
$10.20M
Day Range
$1.37 - $1.44
52-Week Range
$0.99 - $2.68
Beta
—
Next Earnings
28.12.2026
Support
$1.37
Resistance
$1.77
CLWT is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
+0.7% (1Y)
⚠️ Insufficient data for a reliable StockIQ Score
Only 3 of 7 categories available — Fundamental, Growth, Valuation, Quality unavailable.
Strengths: 1/13 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 200
Price is above the 200-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 5.6% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
68/100
Similarity
8
Historical Matches
72/100
Analog Quality
+18.0%
Median 40D Outcome
1/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
63%
+8.9% … +37.7%
🟡 Base
0%
— … —
🔴 Bearish
38%
-9.2% … -7.9%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 5 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 8 similar historical cases for this stock, 63% (95% CI 31%–86%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +7.2%.
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 75% (41%–93%) | +2.4% | +1.3% … +5.2% | +0.0% |
| 10D | 75% (41%–93%) | +5.1% | -1.6% … +8.2% | +0.8% |
| 20D | 63% (31%–86%) | +7.2% | -7.7% … +17.3% | +2.4% |
| 40D | 63% (31%–86%) | +18.0% | -0.2% … +32.1% | +3.3% |
| 60D | 88% (53%–98%) | +34.8% | +22.3% … +40.3% | +27.3% |
Sample size: 8 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-05 | 68/100 | Downtrend | +8.9% | +33.0% |
| 2026-03-23 | 66/100 | High Volatility | +10.4% | +36.5% |
| 2026-05-19 | 54/100 | High Volatility | +37.7% | +48.2% |
| 2026-06-04 | 49/100 | High Volatility | +45.7% | +43.1% |
| 2026-04-07 | 48/100 | Consolidation | -8.2% | +39.3% |
| 2026-04-21 | 41/100 | Uptrend | -10.2% | +28.3% |
| 2026-06-29 | 35/100 | High Volatility | +5.5% | +4.1% |
| 2026-03-09 | 32/100 | High Volatility | -7.6% | -7.6% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLY (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
The stock CLWT earns an overall investorScore of 53, positioning it in the MODERATE risk-reward category. The technical indicators reveal a mixed but cautiously optimistic picture: while the price remains above both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages—suggesting short-to-medium-term bullishness—the presence of a negative MACD histogram and a price below the Parabolic SAR signals potential downward pressure. The RSI (52.8) and ADX (27.1) indicate a healthy momentum and a strong trend, though the ROC (2.5% over 12 days) suggests limited near-term acceleration. On the news front, the stock’s inclusion in a list of 12 Industrials stocks moving in Monday’s after-market session hints at sector-specific tailwinds, though broader market sentiment remains neutral. Risk factors are pronounced: the Keltner Channel (0.00) and historical volatility (44.9% max drawdown) underscore significant downside exposure, while the ATR (5.4%) reflects moderate price volatility. These elements collectively balance technical resilience with elevated risk, resulting in a moderate assessment.
The stock price sits above both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, with a positive RSI (52.8) and strong ADX (27.1) indicating a healthy upward trend, though the MACD histogram is negative and the price is below the Parabolic SAR, signaling potential downward pressure.
This balance of bullish and bearish technical signals suggests a stock in a transitional phase, where short-term momentum may be weakening despite longer-term support.
The stock is highlighted in a sector-specific after-market session list (Industrials), indicating some positive sectoral momentum, but no broader news-driven catalysts are evident.
Sectoral movement can provide short-term support, but the lack of broader news signals limits the stock’s upward potential beyond industry trends.
The Keltner Channel score is 0.00, with a 3-year annualized return of 0.0% and a maximum drawdown of 44.9%, while the ATR (5.4%) reflects moderate volatility—all pointing to elevated risk and potential downside volatility.
These risk metrics indicate the stock may experience significant price swings, making it vulnerable to market corrections or sector-specific downturns.
StockIQ conclusion
CLWT exhibits a moderate risk-reward profile, with technical indicators showing mixed signals—short-term momentum appears resilient, yet downward pressure from the MACD and Parabolic SAR suggests caution. Sectoral movement provides some support, but elevated risk metrics, including historical volatility and drawdown potential, underscore the need for careful monitoring. The stock’s performance hinges on whether technical strength can overcome near-term bearish signals, while broader market and sector conditions remain critical.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
33
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
Not enough data yet to generate this synthesis.
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
23
Risk
34
Sentiment
56
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Everyone's writing about Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited. News trend score: 56. Reason: 1 of the last 1 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
33
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
100
Fundamentals
—
Technical
23
Valuation
—
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-9%
Market Narrative
35
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
-15
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 100
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 95
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 76
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 59
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 26
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 25
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 24
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 21
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 14
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 9 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
A pattern consistent with an early/mid distribution phase — a trading range after an advance with declining volume.
Medium confidence
$1.37
Range Bottom
$1.77
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 13.6.2024 | $0.080 |
| 10.6.2022 | $0.060 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 1 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 1 articles.
Benzinga · 20.7.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (CLWT) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for CLWT specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
CLWT's technical score is 23/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 200-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 5.6% of price; Calmar: -0.04 (3y annualized return -1.6% / max drawdown 44.9%); Price is below the 50-day average.
Yes — CLWT has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 0 filings.
No recent insider transaction filings found for this stock.
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
7,274 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 14,129 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
16.7% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 36.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology