Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Utilities · ·
$31.07
▲ $0.54 (+1.8%)
Market data updated: 09/26 11:08 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/26/2026
News analyzed: 09/26/2026
Market Cap
$422.05M
Day Range
$30.41 - $31.67
52-Week Range
$23.76 - $52.73
Beta
—
Next Earnings
23.11.2026
Support
$25.91
Resistance
$34.40
CLFD is a stock from the Utilities sector — Electricity, water, and residential gas — steady demand and heavy regulation, considered a defensive, dividend-paying sector.
-7.9% (1Y)
Strengths: 14/29 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 31.8%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Net margin
Net margin: -5.4% (negative)
Fundamental
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
59
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
today · $31.07
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 10 to 39 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
71
Quality
47
Value
50
Momentum
62
Risk
46
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
41
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Clearfield, Inc. highlights its strategic expansion into the wireless infrastructure market through a distribution deal with WAV, announced in early September 2026. The company also received recognition for its NOVA™ platform with a Gold award at the 2026 ISE Network Innovators’ Awards. Additionally, Clearfield secured a significant $22 million hyperscale data center order, validating its growth thesis, though it adjusted its full-year guidance due to broadband market challenges. Analysts, including Needham’s Ryan Koontz, maintained a "Buy" rating while lowering their price target.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Clearfield, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
34
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
37
Psychology
70
Fundamentals
41
Technical
62
Valuation
50
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
-20%
Market Narrative
76
Fundamental Reality
37
Narrative Gap
+39
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for CLFD suggests a dominant loss aversion bias, likely due to the steep 28.4% decline over three months, which may be discouraging further participation despite positive sentiment. The narrative gap (67 vs. 37) hints at a disconnect where optimism (e.g., 100/100 news sentiment) doesn’t fully offset the psychological weight of past losses. Mild FOMO and euphoria exist but are overshadowed by the heavy loss aversion anchor. The key question is whether recent momentum can sustain participation or if investors remain anchored to the downtrend.
Updated: 09/06/2026, 05:36 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Clearfield's $22 million hyperscale data center order provides the first tangible validation of its data center growth thesis."
"Clearfield’s strategy to expand its presence in the wireless market as fiber, power, and active infrastructure move."
"Clearfield signs distribution deal with WAV to expand presence in wireless market."
"Clearfield’s NOVA™ Platform Earns Gold in 2026 ISE Network Innovators’ Awards"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 3D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jack Schwager — 16/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The methodologies for CLFD reveal a stark divide between those emphasizing fundamental strength and those skeptical of its long-term or speculative appeal. At the top, Bagehot’s near-perfect score highlights its liquidity resilience, while Graham’s defensive and enterprising approaches both see value—though the latter is less enthusiastic due to a lack of deep bargain conditions. Meanwhile, growth-focused investors like Lynch and Marks (cycle) are cautiously optimistic, viewing it as undervalued or early-cycle, but even they temper expectations. On the other end, Fisher’s low score reflects a dearth of the qualitative traits he prized, while Livermore’s outright rejection stems from its apparent divergence from prevailing market momentum. The middle ground—where Nelson, Marks, and Loeb land—suggests a stock that’s neither a slam dunk nor a red flag, but requires careful management, contrasting sharply with the more decisive verdicts from the extremes.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 86
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 79
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 62
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 61
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 61
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 56
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 56
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 55
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 47
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 45
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 39
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 38
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 32
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 20
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 16
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 285 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (6 bullish · 3 bearish · 3 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
33.7%
Operating Margin
1.4%
Net Margin
-5.4%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
-3.1%
ROA
-2.6%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$0.58
Cash
$21.49M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
5.42
Debt/Equity
0.00
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$18.51
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$17.83
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 8 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 24.9.2026
MT Newswires · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
Business Wire · 2.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 28.8.2026
Business Wire · 20.8.2026
Benzinga · 6.8.2026
Benzinga · 6.8.2026
Benzinga · 6.8.2026
Yahoo · 6.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 6.8.2026
Yahoo · 5.8.2026
MarketBeat · 5.8.2026
Yahoo · 5.8.2026
Zacks · 5.8.2026
ChartMill · 5.8.2026
Associated Press · 5.8.2026
Yahoo · 5.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 5.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 5.8.2026
Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 59/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
CLFD currently scores 59/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
CLFD's technical score is 62/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 31.8%; Net income growth: 35.4%; Debt/equity: 0.00.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Net margin: -5.4% (negative); Operating margin is eroding over time; ATR: 4.1% of price.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for CLFD.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 14 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beranek Cheryl | Open Market Sale | 1.7.2026 | 1,778 | -1,778 | $40.06 |
| Beranek Cheryl | Open Market Sale | 1.7.2026 | 492,973 | -1,778 | $40.06 |
| HERZOG DANIEL R | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 752 | +752 | $24.78 |
| Beranek Cheryl | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 210 | +210 | $24.78 |
| Hill John P | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 459 | +459 | $24.78 |
| Khemakhem Anis | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 158 | +158 | $24.78 |
| HERZOG DANIEL R | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 85,834 | +752 | $24.78 |
| Beranek Cheryl | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 494,751 | +210 | $24.78 |
| Hill John P | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 192,674 | +459 | $24.78 |
| Khemakhem Anis | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 25,284 | +158 | $24.78 |
| Khemakhem Anis | Open Market Sale | 9.6.2026 | 1,684 | -1,684 | $39.90 |
| Khemakhem Anis | Open Market Sale | 9.6.2026 | 25,126 | -1,684 | $39.90 |
| Beranek Cheryl | Open Market Sale | 1.6.2026 | 7,500 | -7,500 | $46.92 |
| Beranek Cheryl | Open Market Sale | 1.6.2026 | 494,541 | -7,500 | $46.92 |
| Beranek Cheryl | Open Market Sale | 27.5.2026 | 2,500 | -2,500 | $50.00 |
| Beranek Cheryl | Open Market Sale | 27.5.2026 | 502,041 | -2,500 | $50.00 |
| Jones Walter Louis JR | Open Market Sale | 11.5.2026 | 2,391 | -2,391 | $46.05 |
| Beranek Cheryl | Open Market Sale | 11.5.2026 | 2,500 | -2,500 | $45.02 |
| Beranek Cheryl | Open Market Sale | 11.5.2026 | 504,541 | -2,500 | $45.02 |
| Jones Walter Louis JR | Open Market Sale | 11.5.2026 | 8,682 | -2,391 | $46.05 |
| Beranek Cheryl | Open Market Sale | 8.5.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | $40.27 |
| Beranek Cheryl | Open Market Sale | 8.5.2026 | 507,041 | -5,000 | $40.27 |
| Khemakhem Anis | Tax Withholding in Shares | 6.5.2026 | 635 | -635 | $30.28 |
| Khemakhem Anis | Tax Withholding in Shares | 6.5.2026 | 26,810 | -635 | $30.28 |
| Wirsbinski Carol Ann | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.2.2026 | 2,544 | +2,544 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,373,764 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 1,369,076 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
71.5% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 79.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology