Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Utilities · ·
$34.44
▼ $0.92 (-2.6%)
Market data updated: 09/19 07:08 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$267.31M
Day Range
$34.25 - $35.00
52-Week Range
$30.50 - $36.98
Beta
—
Next Earnings
28.10.2026
Support
$33.25
Resistance
$36.98
ARTNA is a stock from the Utilities sector — Electricity, water, and residential gas — steady demand and heavy regulation, considered a defensive, dividend-paying sector.
+6.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 7/31 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 200
Price is above the 200-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$46.77 vs. price $34.44 (-235.8%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
48
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
56
Quality
42
Value
38
Momentum
39
Risk
34
Sentiment
80
Fundamental
51
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
$0.64 vs $0.55, sales $30.664M vs $29.800M) -
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Artesian Resources Corporation - Class A Non-Voting. News trend score: 80. Reason: 5 of the last 8 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
13
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
36
Psychology
31
Fundamentals
51
Technical
39
Valuation
38
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
+7%
Market Narrative
52
Fundamental Reality
36
Narrative Gap
+16
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
Market behavior suggests a mild divergence between positive headline sentiment and muted price action. While news sentiment sits at 80/100 and price remains 6.0% above the 200-day average, negative momentum of -1.6% keeps psychology scores subdued. Evidence indicates a narrative score of 54 outstripping reality at 36, signaling moderate narrative bias. The key open question is whether high news sentiment can trigger renewed volume or if price momentum will continue to lag reality.
Updated: 09/17/2026, 09:20 AM
👥 What the crowd believes
"reported quarterly earnings of $0.64 per share which beat the analyst consensus estimate of $0.55"
"trades 18% below fair value with a 3.7% dividend yield"
📈 11D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 95/100
🔴 Weakest match
Walter Bagehot — 21/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on his documented principles, Charles Mackay’s model estimates modest crowd enthusiasm, giving the stock a relatively high score, whereas the Efficient‑Market view of Malkiel & Bogle sees only mixed evidence for outperformance, reflected in a lower score. Graham’s and Veblen’s assessments are similar, both landing near the mid‑50s and describing mixed signals about value and profit growth, which aligns with their focus on intrinsic worth and real earnings. Fisher’s and Graham’s Enterprising Investor scores are much lower, indicating that the stock lacks the quality, growth, and statistical cheapness those investors required. Conversely, Marks and Housel flag higher expectations and liquidity concerns, resulting in moderate to cautious scores that mirror their emphasis on cycle timing and risk management.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 95
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 75
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 53
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 53
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 53
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 51
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 51
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 47
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 47
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 42
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 41
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 39
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 39
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 27
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 25
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 21
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 7 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
24.6%
Net Margin
20.2%
EBITDA Margin
36.8%
ROE
9.1%
ROA
2.7%
ROIC
—
EPS
$2.21
Cash
$52.00K
Total Debt
$176.41M
Current Ratio
0.64
Debt/Equity
0.71
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 17.8.2026 | $0.320 |
| 15.5.2026 | $0.320 |
| 14.5.2026 | $0.320 |
| 13.2.2026 | $0.314 |
| 12.2.2026 | $0.314 |
| 14.11.2025 | $0.314 |
| 13.11.2025 | $0.314 |
| 15.8.2025 | $0.307 |
| 14.8.2025 | $0.307 |
| 16.5.2025 | $0.307 |
| 15.5.2025 | $0.307 |
| 7.2.2025 | $0.301 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$34.44
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$46.77
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-235.8%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
4.6%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.6% | $-19.35M | $-17.75M |
| 2 | 4.1% | $-20.14M | $-16.95M |
| 3 | 3.5% | $-20.85M | $-16.10M |
| 4 | 3.0% | $-21.48M | $-15.22M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-22.02M | $-14.31M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-18.50M
Terminal Value
$-347.21M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-225.66M
Enterprise Value
$-305.99M
Net Debt
$176.36M
Equity Value
$-482.34M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$24.24
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$24.05
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 5 positive, 3 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 8 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 28.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 21.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 7.8.2026
Benzinga · 7.8.2026
Associated Press · 6.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 6.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 6.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 9.6.2026
Artesian Resources Corporation - Class A Non-Voting (ARTNA) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 48/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ARTNA currently scores 48/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, ARTNA's estimated fair value is -$46.77, which is 235.8% below the current price of $34.44. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
ARTNA's technical score is 39/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 200-day average; +4.8% over the last 3 months relative to the index; Operating margin: 24.6% — strong.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$46.77 vs. price $34.44 (-235.8%); Operating margin is eroding over time; Current ratio: 0.64.
Yes — ARTNA has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 10 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAYLOR DIAN C | Open Market Sale | 3.9.2026 | 2,000 | -2,000 | $36.11 |
| TAYLOR DIAN C | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 1,124 | -1,124 | $36.00 |
| TAYLOR DIAN C | Open Market Sale | 31.8.2026 | 2,000 | -2,000 | $35.50 |
| TAYLOR DIAN C | Open Market Sale | 28.8.2026 | 2,000 | -2,000 | $35.50 |
| TAYLOR DIAN C | Open Market Sale | 28.8.2026 | 30,073 | -2,000 | $35.50 |
| TAYLOR DIAN C | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 32,073 | -2,000 | $35.68 |
| TAYLOR DIAN C | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 2,000 | -2,000 | $35.68 |
| TAYLOR DIAN C | Open Market Sale | 20.8.2026 | 2,000 | -2,000 | $35.30 |
| TAYLOR DIAN C | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 2,000 | -2,000 | $35.00 |
| TAYLOR DIAN C | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 2,000 | -2,000 | $35.01 |
| DiNunzio Joseph A | W | 19.5.2026 | 193 | +193 | — |
| DiNunzio Joseph A | W | 19.5.2026 | 16,133 | +193 | — |
| Rossi Salvatore J JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.5.2026 | 1,000 | +1,000 | $31.41 |
| EISENBREY JOHN R JR | Other Transaction | 5.5.2026 | 1,000 | +1,000 | $31.41 |
| EISENBREY JOHN R JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.5.2026 | 1,000 | +1,000 | $31.41 |
| Houghton Michael | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.5.2026 | 1,000 | +1,000 | $31.41 |
| Taylor Nicholle Renee | Other Transaction | 5.5.2026 | 1,000 | +1,000 | $31.41 |
| Rossi Salvatore J JR | Other Transaction | 5.5.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | $31.41 |
| EISENBREY JOHN R JR | Other Transaction | 5.5.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | $31.41 |
| TAYLOR DIAN C | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.5.2026 | 1,000 | +1,000 | $31.41 |
| Taylor Nicholle Renee | Other Transaction | 5.5.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | $31.41 |
| Houghton Michael | Other Transaction | 5.5.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | $31.41 |
| Houghton Michael | Other Transaction | 5.5.2026 | 1,000 | +1,000 | $31.41 |
| TAYLOR DIAN C | Other Transaction | 5.5.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | $31.41 |
| TAYLOR DIAN C | Other Transaction | 5.5.2026 | 1,000 | +1,000 | $31.41 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
63,149 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 91,570 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
37.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 46.6% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology