Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$8.89
▲ $0.25 (+2.9%)
Market data updated: 09/25 07:11 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/24/2026
News analyzed: 09/25/2026
Market Cap
$1.36B
Day Range
$8.52 - $8.93
52-Week Range
$4.45 - $13.88
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.11.2026
Support
$6.33
Resistance
$9.13
CERT is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
-23.4% (1Y)
Strengths: 20/31 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $9.80 vs. price $8.89 (+10.3%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Net margin
Net margin: -0.4% (negative)
Fundamental
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
69
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
today · $8.89
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from -6 to 22 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
today · $8.89
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 6 to 57 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
73
Quality
63
Value
62
Momentum
88
Risk
46
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
39
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Certara, Inc. has centered on its Q2 2026 financial results, which showed a slight revenue increase to $93.27 million but a widened net loss of $55.27 million. The company highlighted strong software revenue growth—now 53% of total—driven by AI-assisted tools, which boosted development by 65% year-over-year. Leadership changes, including the departure of Leif Pedersen and new appointments, along with restructuring efforts, have been emphasized. Analysts like Barclays maintained an equal-weight rating while raising their price target to $7.5, though shares declined following the earnings report.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Certara, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
51
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
58
Fundamentals
39
Technical
88
Valuation
62
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+52%
Market Narrative
70
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+28
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant Herding state (56) reflects CERT’s relative underperformance against peers, consistent with investors aligning trades to sector trends rather than independent conviction. While euphoria persists due to valuation metrics (+25% above 200-day avg), the negative ROC (-5.0%) and DCF discount (-19%) temper extreme optimism. The narrative gap (-6) suggests a slight disconnect between market sentiment (36) and objective reality (42), but no clear bias like loss aversion or anchoring is active. The key question: *Is the herd’s underperformance a tactical shift or a precursor to broader sector rotation?*
Updated: 09/04/2026, 11:29 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"executive reshuffling including the departure of President and Chief Commercial Officer Leif Pedersen and the appointment of Julien Perrier as Chief Commercial Officer"
"Software revenue hit 53% of total as AI-assisted code boosted development 65% year over year"
"Management reaffirmed its full-year revenue outlook while outlining further changes to its commercial organization"
"Barclays analyst Luke Sergott maintains Certara with Equal-Weight and raises the price target from $6.5 to $7.5"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 3D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 80/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 7/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among historical methodologies, with some models seeing strong potential while others flag significant caution. The highest-scoring approaches—Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s cycle analysis, Benjamin Graham’s defensive and enterprising frameworks, and Peter Lynch’s growth thesis—all suggest the stock is either undervalued, poised for a rebound, or aligned with long-term growth, scoring above 70. Meanwhile, more skeptical voices like Jesse Livermore and Jack Schwager’s trend-following discipline warn against it entirely, scoring poorly due to perceived negative momentum or lack of a clear setup. The middle ground, represented by Howard Marks and Morgan Housel, acknowledges the stock’s merits but highlights potential overvaluation or moderate risk, while Philip Fisher’s absence of a ‘quality/growth signature’ and the efficient-market skeptics further dilute enthusiasm. The contrast underscores how valuation, trend, and growth narratives clash—some see a bargain or momentum play, while others dismiss it as speculative or overpriced.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 80
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 79
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 72
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 69
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 65
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 64
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 60
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 58
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 55
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 52
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 48
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 45
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 43
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 37
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 30
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 7
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 283 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (10 bullish · 1 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
5.0%
Net Margin
-0.4%
EBITDA Margin
23.0%
ROE
-0.2%
ROA
-0.1%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$0.01
Cash
$189.39M
Total Debt
$293.09M
Current Ratio
2.05
Debt/Equity
0.28
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$8.89
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$9.80
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+10.3%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
7.7%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7.7% | $101.82M | $93.41M |
| 2 | 6.4% | $108.31M | $91.16M |
| 3 | 5.1% | $113.82M | $87.89M |
| 4 | 3.8% | $118.14M | $83.69M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $121.09M | $78.70M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$94.56M
Terminal Value
$1.91B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$1.24B
Enterprise Value
$1.68B
Net Debt
$103.70M
Equity Value
$1.57B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$6.63
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$0.99
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 9 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
GlobeNewswire · 22.9.2026
Yahoo · 22.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 22.9.2026
Yahoo · 22.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 31.8.2026
Yahoo · 31.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 24.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 7.8.2026
Yahoo · 7.8.2026
Benzinga · 5.8.2026
Motley Fool · 5.8.2026
Yahoo · 5.8.2026
Moby · 5.8.2026
Yahoo · 5.8.2026
MarketBeat · 4.8.2026
Yahoo · 4.8.2026
Certara, Inc. (CERT) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 69/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
CERT currently scores 69/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, CERT's estimated fair value is $9.80, which is 10.3% above the current price of $8.89. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
CERT's technical score is 88/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $9.80 vs. price $8.89 (+10.3%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 87.5%; Net income growth: 86.8%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Net margin: -0.4% (negative); ATR: 4.2% of price; Calmar: -0.19 (3y annualized return -14.3% / max drawdown 77.0%).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for CERT.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mohammed Faiz | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 63,532 | +63,532 | — |
| Anhalt Rona | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.6.2026 | 7,147 | +7,147 | — |
| Corcoran Daniel | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.6.2026 | 4,210 | -4,210 | $5.82 |
| Anhalt Rona | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.6.2026 | 7,147 | -7,147 | — |
| Corcoran Daniel | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.6.2026 | 14,889 | +14,889 | — |
| Anhalt Rona | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.6.2026 | 2,241 | -2,241 | $5.82 |
| Corcoran Daniel | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.6.2026 | 14,889 | -14,889 | — |
| Corcoran Daniel | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.6.2026 | 7,941 | +7,941 | — |
| Corcoran Daniel | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.6.2026 | 7,941 | -7,941 | — |
| Corcoran Daniel | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.6.2026 | 7,893 | -7,893 | $5.82 |
| Anhalt Rona | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.6.2026 | 19,030 | +7,147 | — |
| Anhalt Rona | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.6.2026 | 16,789 | -2,241 | $5.82 |
| Anhalt Rona | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.6.2026 | 7,147 | -7,147 | — |
| Corcoran Daniel | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.6.2026 | 29,260 | +7,941 | — |
| Corcoran Daniel | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.6.2026 | 25,050 | -4,210 | $5.82 |
| Corcoran Daniel | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.6.2026 | 39,939 | +14,889 | — |
| Corcoran Daniel | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.6.2026 | 32,046 | -7,893 | $5.82 |
| Corcoran Daniel | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.6.2026 | 7,941 | -7,941 | — |
| Corcoran Daniel | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.6.2026 | 0 | -14,889 | — |
| WALSH MATTHEW M | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 33,222 | +33,222 | — |
| CASHMAN JAMES E III | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 33,222 | +33,222 | — |
| Crane Rosemary A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.5.2026 | 15,757 | -15,757 | — |
| Bedi Arjun | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.5.2026 | 5,547 | -5,547 | — |
| Killefer Nancy | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.5.2026 | 15,757 | -15,757 | — |
| WALSH MATTHEW M | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.5.2026 | 15,757 | -15,757 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
28,814,125 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 28,972,317 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
51.5% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 60.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology