Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$72.86
▼ $2.13 (-2.8%)
Market data updated: 09/24 10:18 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/24/2026
News analyzed: 09/24/2026
Market Cap
$4.27B
Day Range
$70.51 - $73.73
52-Week Range
$42.82 - $101.24
Beta
—
Next Earnings
26.10.2026
Support
$59.45
Resistance
$84.77
CECO is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
+42.8% (1Y)
Strengths: 8/32 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 38.8%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$8.60 vs. price $72.86 (-111.8%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (68/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (33/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
56
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
15d ago · $78.49
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 13 to 39 day-over-day
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
68
Quality
58
Value
33
Momentum
41
Risk
42
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
64
Institutional
14
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of CECO Environmental Corp. has highlighted its strong financial performance, particularly focusing on its outstanding long-term stock returns, with annualized gains of 20.29% over 10 years and 18.66% over 15 years, significantly outpacing market averages. The company also received praise for its Q2 2026 earnings, which impressed analysts, alongside positive analyst ratings and upcoming investor conferences. Some reports compared its stock performance favorably against peers in the industrial and environmental services sector.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about CECO Environmental Corp.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
17
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
41
Psychology
38
Fundamentals
64
Technical
41
Valuation
33
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-21%
Market Narrative
62
Fundamental Reality
41
Narrative Gap
+21
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
CECO’s psychology profile reflects a narrative-driven herding dynamic—outperformance relative to peers (+4.2% vs. +1.6%) aligns traders despite weak technicals (negative ROC, neutral RSI). The 20-point narrative gap (61 vs. 41) hints at overestimation of positive catalysts, while euphoric sentiment (100/100) clashes with underperformance vs. fundamentals. The absence of panic or loss aversion suggests traders are more focused on relative gains than absolute risk. The key question: *Will the herding momentum sustain, or will the gap between narrative and reality widen?*
Updated: 09/05/2026, 12:11 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"$100 invested 10 years ago would be worth significantly more due to 20.29% annualized returns (Benzinga #1)"
"CECO Environmental impresses in Q2 Industrial & Environmental Services earnings (StockStory #4)"
"New Strong Buy Stocks for August includes CECO Environmental (Zacks #9)"
"Thermon integration drives growth and orders surge across end markets (StockStory #12)"
📈 5D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 93/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jack Schwager — 15/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on his documented principles, the model estimates that Peter Lynch (93) and Thorstein Veblen (67) see CECO as a growth candidate because their scores emphasize strong earnings expansion and value‑creating growth, while investors such as Edgar Lawrence Smith (62) and Jesse Livermore (58) view the stock as only modestly attractive or lacking a clear trend. Mid‑range scores from Philip Fisher (49), Charles Mackay (49) and Howard Marks (cycle) (47) reflect mixed signals—Fisher finds insufficient quality, Mackay notes crowd excitement, and Marks suggests the stock sits near a cycle midpoint. Lower‑scoring strategists, including Walter Bagehot (40), Gerald Loeb (32) and Benjamin Graham (16), focus on liquidity risk, capital threats and defensive‑criteria failures, leading to stark warnings to stay out or limit exposure. Overall, the divergent verdicts arise because each methodology weights growth, value, risk, liquidity and cycle factors differently, producing a wide spread of recommendations from bullish to bearish.
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 93
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 68
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 67
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 62
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 61
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 61
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 49
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 46
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 41
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 40
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 39
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 32
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 17
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 17
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 16
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 15
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 285 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 6 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
34.8%
Operating Margin
13.7%
Net Margin
6.5%
EBITDA Margin
16.9%
ROE
15.8%
ROA
5.6%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.42
Cash
$33.14M
Total Debt
$212.44M
Current Ratio
1.34
Debt/Equity
0.67
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$72.86
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$8.60
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-111.8%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
23.4%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 23.4% | $-6.76M | $-6.20M |
| 2 | 18.2% | $-7.99M | $-6.73M |
| 3 | 12.9% | $-9.02M | $-6.97M |
| 4 | 7.7% | $-9.72M | $-6.89M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-9.96M | $-6.48M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-5.48M
Terminal Value
$-157.13M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-102.12M
Enterprise Value
$-135.39M
Net Debt
$179.29M
Equity Value
$-314.68M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$8.67
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$1.85
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 9 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 23.9.2026
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
StockStory · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 7.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 7.9.2026
Benzinga · 28.8.2026
Yahoo · 24.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 24.8.2026
StockStory · 19.8.2026
StockStory · 19.8.2026
Motley Fool · 17.8.2026
StockStory · 17.8.2026
StockStory · 16.8.2026
Zacks · 14.8.2026
Zacks · 14.8.2026
CECO Environmental Corp. (CECO) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 56/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
CECO currently scores 56/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, CECO's estimated fair value is -$8.60, which is 111.8% below the current price of $72.86. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
CECO's technical score is 41/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 38.8%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 280.6%; Net income growth: 286.3%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$8.60 vs. price $72.86 (-111.8%); ATR: 5.7% of price; Free cash flow growth: -173.5%.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for CECO.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 1 purchases and 6 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johansson Peter K. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.8.2026 | 2,914 | -2,914 | $79.59 |
| Harris-Peterson Candace | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.7.2026 | 890 | -890 | $79.03 |
| Harris-Peterson Candace | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.7.2026 | 21,101 | -890 | $79.03 |
| Kovachev Kiril | Tax Withholding in Shares | 5.7.2026 | 460 | -460 | $82.15 |
| Kovachev Kiril | Tax Withholding in Shares | 5.7.2026 | 15,801 | -460 | $82.15 |
| DEZWIREK JASON | Open Market Sale | 25.6.2026 | 34,000 | -34,000 | $97.28 |
| DEZWIREK JASON | Open Market Sale | 25.6.2026 | 132,000 | -34,000 | $97.28 |
| Johansson Peter K. | Open Market Sale | 24.6.2026 | 30,000 | -30,000 | $96.49 |
| DEZWIREK JASON | Open Market Sale | 24.6.2026 | 34,000 | -34,000 | $96.61 |
| Johansson Peter K. | Open Market Sale | 24.6.2026 | 40,746 | -30,000 | $96.49 |
| DEZWIREK JASON | Open Market Sale | 24.6.2026 | 166,000 | -34,000 | $96.61 |
| Harris-Peterson Candace | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.6.2026 | 3,105 | +3,105 | — |
| Harris-Peterson Candace | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.6.2026 | 21,991 | +3,105 | — |
| Harris-Peterson Candace | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 3,133 | +3,133 | — |
| Harris-Peterson Candace | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 4,679 | +4,679 | — |
| KNOWLING ROBERT E JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 2,215 | +2,215 | — |
| Harris-Peterson Candace | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 2,735 | +2,735 | — |
| Mannarino Claudio A | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 1,107 | +1,107 | — |
| Nanda Munish | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 2,215 | +2,215 | — |
| Harris-Peterson Candace | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 1,401 | +1,401 | — |
| WALLMAN RICHARD F | Open Market Purchase | 1.6.2026 | 20,000 | +20,000 | $76.85 |
| GEORGE MARCUS J | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 36,690 | +36,690 | — |
| Harris-Peterson Candace | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 6,313 | +6,313 | — |
| SACHS VALERIE GENTILE | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 3,190 | +3,190 | — |
| DEZWIREK JASON | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 2,215 | +2,215 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,967,749 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 1,737,388 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
35.5% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 39.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology