Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$14.80
▼ $0.04 (-0.3%)
Market data updated: 09/20 09:06 PM
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$14.77 - $15.05
52-Week Range
$12.57 - $24.73
Beta
—
Next Earnings
16.11.2026
Support
$13.76
Resistance
$19.33
BZ is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
-39.2% (1Y)
🟢 Strong
Strengths: 1/13 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Relative strength vs. S&P 500
+6.0% over the last 3 months relative to the index
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 4.3% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
BZ demonstrates a robust overall investor score of 84, driven primarily by strong technical indicators and a neutral-to-positive news sentiment, though tempered by notable risk factors. The technical category scores exceptionally high at 87, reflecting a clear upward momentum with the stock price above both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, a positive MACD histogram, and a healthy RSI of 52.8. These signals collectively suggest sustained bullish momentum, though the %K at 43.4 indicates a neutral short-term trend. Meanwhile, the news category achieves a perfect score of 100, as recent headlines highlight both operational shifts (neutral) and significant financial growth—such as a 173% GAAP profit surge—despite discrepancies in adjusted net income. However, the risk category drags the score down to 34, with a relatively low ATR (4.3%) and a volatile Calmar ratio (0.06) signaling high downside risk, including a potential 51.6% maximum drawdown over three years. The declining trading volume despite price appreciation further raises concerns about potential weakening interest or liquidity.
The stock price remains above both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, with a positive MACD histogram and an RSI of 52.8 indicating healthy upward momentum, though %K is neutral at 43.4.
This suggests strong bullish momentum and potential for continued price appreciation, reinforcing investor confidence in the short-to-medium term.
Recent news includes operational changes (neutral) and significant financial growth, such as a 173% GAAP profit increase, though adjusted net income rose only 9.4%, creating mixed but predominantly positive sentiment.
Positive financial performance and strategic shifts can attract investor attention and support long-term valuation, despite minor discrepancies in earnings metrics.
The ATR is low at 4.3%, and the Calmar ratio is poor at 0.06, indicating high volatility and a maximum potential drawdown of 51.6% over three years, alongside declining trading volume.
These factors signal elevated risk, particularly for short-term traders, and may deter investors sensitive to volatility or liquidity concerns.
StockIQ conclusion
BZ exhibits a balanced profile with strong technical performance and positive news sentiment, supported by recent financial growth and strategic initiatives. However, elevated risk factors—including volatility, declining volume, and earnings discrepancies—create significant concerns that temper the overall score. Investors should weigh the potential for continued momentum against the inherent risks, particularly in volatile markets or sectors. The stock’s performance remains dependent on operational execution, macroeconomic stability, and investor sentiment, which are not fully captured in deterministic data.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
44
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
5d ago · $15.45
Evidence: Panic-selling score jumped from 2 to 41 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
12d ago · $16.92
Evidence: 9 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
13d ago · $16.92
Evidence: 9 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
14d ago · $16.92
Evidence: 9 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
15d ago · $16.92
Evidence: 9 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
16d ago · $16.97
Evidence: 9 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
17d ago · $16.87
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
17d ago · $16.87
Evidence: 9 bullish / 0 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
17d ago · $17.30
Evidence: -3.6pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
18d ago · $17.36
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
18d ago · $17.36
Evidence: 11 bullish / 0 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
18d ago · $17.53
Evidence: 1.8x recent average volume
What happened after
18d ago · $17.55
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
18d ago · $17.55
Evidence: 11 bullish / 0 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
19d ago · $17.38
Evidence: 1.7x recent average volume
What happened after
19d ago · $17.36
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
19d ago · $17.36
Evidence: 2.1x recent average volume
What happened after
19d ago · $17.36
Evidence: 11 bullish / 0 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
22d ago · $17.80
Evidence: -5.8pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
22d ago · $17.80
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 26, 2026
Then
73
$16.29
Now
44
$14.80
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
23
Risk
34
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **Kanzhun Limited** (Nasdaq: BZ) has focused on its shifting executive leadership, mixed financial performance, and strategic expansion efforts. The company announced internal role changes, including the rotation of its president to Chief Marketing Officer, while reporting a **14.1% revenue growth** and **173% GAAP profit surge** in Q2—though adjusted net income rose only **9.4%**, highlighting discrepancies in earnings. Analysts like Barclays maintained an **overweight rating** with an upgraded price target to **$20**, despite long-term shareholder declines of **55%**. Meanwhile, the company explored growth in **Brazil, Argentina, and Vietnam**, though revenue growth in China has slowed over the past three years.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about KANZHUN LIMITED - American Depository. News trend score: 100. Reason: 13 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 4 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
33
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
37
Fundamentals
—
Technical
23
Valuation
—
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+8%
Market Narrative
53
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+3
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for BZ is dominated by **euphoria**, as evidenced by strong momentum, a substantial premium above its 200-day average, and uniformly positive news sentiment. The lack of herding or loss aversion suggests traders are focused on the stock’s relative strength rather than broader market cues. However, the **narrative-reality gap** (20 points) hints at a disconnect between market enthusiasm and underlying fundamentals. The key question remains whether this euphoria is justified by fundamentals or driven by speculative momentum. The absence of panic or anchoring bias implies traders are not yet reacting defensively, but the gap could signal potential overvaluation or mispricing.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 12:47 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"GAAP net income jumped 173.1%... driven largely by an investment gain rather than its online recruitment operations"
"approved an annual cash dividend of US$0.255 per ordinary share... totaling about US$230 million"
"highlighted record operating margins and expanding AI-driven recruitment features"
"Barclays analyst raises price target from $19 to $20"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 19D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 94/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among historical methodologies, with scores ranging from a cautious mid-cycle stance (Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s 62) to outright red flags (Morgan Housel’s 0). The middle-ground thinkers—like Mackay (53) and Livermore (52)—see only faint signals, whether crowd sentiment or trend ambiguity, while the efficient-market camp (51) dismisses it as too weak to justify active picking. Meanwhile, the fundamentalists—Graham, Fisher, Lynch, and Bagehot—all hit dead ends due to insufficient data, leaving their models unable to form a concrete opinion. On the other end, risk-averse voices like Loeb (23) and Veblen (20) see glaring flaws, whether in valuation or speculative behavior, while Marks (31) and his cycle-based approach (40) flag it as a high-risk or mid-cycle non-event. The contrast highlights a stock that’s either too murky for traditional analysis or too volatile for patient, long-term investors.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 94
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 76
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 67
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 56
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 45
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 43
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 30
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 23
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 20
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 17
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 282 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 9 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 8.10.2025 | $0.168 |
| 7.10.2025 | $0.168 |
| 4.12.2023 | $0.180 |
| 3.12.2023 | $0.180 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 13 positive, 3 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Zacks · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 5.9.2026
Yahoo · 5.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 1.9.2026
Benzinga · 28.8.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
Insider Monkey · 28.8.2026
Benzinga · 27.8.2026
Yahoo · 26.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 26.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 26.8.2026
Yahoo · 26.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 26.8.2026
Benzinga · 26.8.2026
Yahoo · 26.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 26.8.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for KANZHUN LIMITED - American Depository (BZ) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for BZ specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
BZ's technical score is 23/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: +6.0% over the last 3 months relative to the index.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 4.3% of price; Calmar: -0.03 (3y annualized return -1.4% / max drawdown 51.6%); Price is below the 50-day average.
Yes — BZ has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 5 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chen Xu | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.9.2026 | 400,000 | +400,000 | $0.50 |
| Chen Xu | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.9.2026 | 400,000 | -400,000 | — |
| Chen Xu | Open Market Sale | 4.9.2026 | 400,000 | -400,000 | $8.50 |
| Zhao Peng Jonathan | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.8.2026 | 10,985,000 | +10,985,000 | — |
| Zhao Peng Jonathan | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.8.2026 | 10,985,000 | +10,985,000 | — |
| WANG Xiehua | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 16.6.2026 | 150,000 | -150,000 | — |
| Chen Xu | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 16.6.2026 | 370 | +370 | — |
| Liu Hongyu | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 16.6.2026 | 4,212 | +4,212 | — |
| Sun Yonggang | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 16.6.2026 | 4,212 | -4,212 | — |
| Wang Wenbei | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 16.6.2026 | 25,000 | +25,000 | — |
| Chen Xu | Open Market Sale | 16.6.2026 | 84 | -84 | $6.83 |
| Sun Yonggang | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 16.6.2026 | 4,212 | +4,212 | — |
| Chen Xu | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 16.6.2026 | 370 | -370 | — |
| Wang Wenbei | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 16.6.2026 | 25,000 | -25,000 | — |
| WANG Xiehua | Open Market Sale | 16.6.2026 | 71,288 | -71,288 | $6.82 |
| Sun Yonggang | Open Market Sale | 16.6.2026 | 548 | -548 | $6.81 |
| Liu Hongyu | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 16.6.2026 | 4,212 | -4,212 | — |
| WANG Xiehua | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 16.6.2026 | 150,000 | +150,000 | — |
| Chen Xu | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 932,434 | +932,434 | — |
| Zhang Kylen Tao | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 932,434 | +932,434 | — |
| Zhao Peng Jonathan | Other Transaction | 12.6.2026 | 3,183,680 | -3,183,680 | — |
| Zhao Peng Jonathan | Other Transaction | 12.6.2026 | 3,183,680 | +3,183,680 | — |
| Zhao Peng Jonathan | Other Transaction | 12.6.2026 | 123,342,721 | -3,183,680 | — |
| Zhao Peng Jonathan | Other Transaction | 12.6.2026 | 3,567,680 | +3,183,680 | — |
| Mu Yang | Open Market Sale | 30.3.2026 | 16,968 | -16,968 | $6.69 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
24,181,862 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 21,672,208 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
57.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 28.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology