Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$42.56
▼ $0.00 (-0.0%)
Market data updated: 09/24 09:09 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/24/2026
News analyzed: 09/24/2026
Market Cap
$737.80M
Day Range
$42.55 - $42.60
52-Week Range
$25.07 - $45.83
Beta
—
Next Earnings
03.11.2026
Support
$25.07
Resistance
$43.13
BWMN is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-1.6% (1Y)
Strengths: 18/32 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 329.4%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Liquidity risk
Current ratio: 0.99
Risk
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (79/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (45/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
63
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
79
Quality
63
Value
45
Momentum
71
Risk
48
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
45
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. has centered on its impending acquisition by Bernhard Capital Partners at a 50% premium, priced at $43 per share, following strong Q2 earnings growth and a 50% increase in backlog. Analysts from JPMorgan, Roth Capital, Craig-Hallum, and B. Riley have downgraded the stock from "Buy" to "Neutral" or "Hold," though some highlight its undervalued potential. The company also affirmed a slightly lower FY2026 sales forecast amid market optimism.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Bowman Consulting Group Ltd.. News trend score: 92. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
41
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
73
Fundamentals
45
Technical
71
Valuation
45
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+42%
Market Narrative
54
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+12
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant anchoring behavior reflects traders fixating on the 1.7% resistance gap, despite euphoric overvaluation (RSI 88, +35% above 200-day avg). The narrative gap (13 points) hints at a disconnect between optimistic expectations and fundamentals, while euphoria (55) suggests investors may overlook valuation (-9% DCF discount). Herding remains muted, but the lack of panic or FOMO-driven volume (0.44x avg) implies caution. The key question: will traders break the resistance anchor, or will euphoria sustain despite valuation warnings?
Updated: 09/08/2026, 08:09 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"JPMorgan Downgrades Bowman Consulting to Underweight From Neutral, Adjusts PT to $43 From $40"
"Bowman Consulting Group will be acquired by Bernhard Capital Partners at $43/share, a ~50% premium to the pre-announcement price."
"Bowman Reports Q2 2026 Revenue Growth as Backlog Jumps 50%"
"affirms FY2026 sales outlook from $520.000 million-$540.000 million to $520.000 million-$540.000 million vs $562.868 million estimate"
📈 3D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Morgan Housel — 99/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 6/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between growth-focused and value-oriented methodologies. Morgan Housel and Peter Lynch, both drawn to long-term compounders and undervalued growth, rate it near the top (93 and 90), praising its potential for quiet appreciation or overlooked upside. Meanwhile, value purists like Benjamin Graham and Howard Marks (Market Cycle) dismiss it outright—Graham’s Enterprising Investor model scores it a mere 6, calling it too expensive, while Marks flags it as late-cycle, warning of inflated expectations. Even moderate value investors like Fisher and Smith, though more cautious, still see it as a solid hold (64–66), while technical or liquidity-focused thinkers like Bagehot and Livermore are outright wary, questioning its stability or market positioning. The contrast highlights a fundamental tension: growth investors see hidden potential, while value and cycle-sensitive models see overvaluation or structural risks.
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 99
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 90
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 66
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 64
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 64
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 62
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 56
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 56
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 54
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 51
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 42
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 41
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 38
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 30
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 25
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 6
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 283 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (8 bullish · 3 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
53.4%
Operating Margin
4.0%
Net Margin
2.6%
EBITDA Margin
7.5%
ROE
4.9%
ROA
2.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.74
Cash
$11.07M
Total Debt
$57.60M
Current Ratio
0.99
Debt/Equity
0.22
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$42.56
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$46.61
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+9.5%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
23.5%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 23.5% | $41.28M | $37.87M |
| 2 | 18.2% | $48.80M | $41.07M |
| 3 | 13.0% | $55.13M | $42.57M |
| 4 | 7.7% | $59.40M | $42.08M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $60.88M | $39.57M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$33.43M
Terminal Value
$960.05M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$623.97M
Enterprise Value
$827.12M
Net Debt
$46.53M
Equity Value
$780.59M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$15.59
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$0.06
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 11 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
MT Newswires · 21.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 21.8.2026
MT Newswires · 13.8.2026
Benzinga · 11.8.2026
MT Newswires · 11.8.2026
MT Newswires · 10.8.2026
ChartMill · 10.8.2026
ChartMill · 10.8.2026
Benzinga · 10.8.2026
InvestorsHub · 10.8.2026
ChartMill · 10.8.2026
Zacks · 10.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 10.8.2026
Benzinga · 10.8.2026
Zacks · 10.8.2026
ChartMill · 10.8.2026
Benzinga · 10.8.2026
Associated Press · 10.8.2026
Benzinga · 10.8.2026
Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 63/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
BWMN currently scores 63/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, BWMN's estimated fair value is $46.61, which is 9.5% above the current price of $42.56. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
BWMN's technical score is 71/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 329.4%; Free cash flow growth: 41.2%; Net income growth: 323.5%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Current ratio: 0.99; Calmar: 0.31 (3y annualized return 17.2% / max drawdown 56.2%); MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for BWMN.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 13 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mulroy Patricia | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 883 | -883 | $42.37 |
| Mulroy Patricia | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 26,330 | -883 | $42.37 |
| Swayze Daniel | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 914 | -914 | $27.24 |
| Swayze Daniel | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 26,363 | -914 | $27.24 |
| Grebbien Virginia Lee | Open Market Sale | 2.6.2026 | 7,500 | -7,500 | $31.65 |
| Grebbien Virginia Lee | Open Market Sale | 2.6.2026 | 7,428 | -7,500 | $31.65 |
| Vicks Raymond Jr. | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.5.2026 | 4,077 | +4,077 | — |
| Riddick Stephen A | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.5.2026 | 4,077 | +4,077 | — |
| Grebbien Virginia Lee | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.5.2026 | 4,077 | +4,077 | — |
| Mulroy Patricia | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.5.2026 | 4,077 | +4,077 | — |
| LAURITO JAMES P | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.5.2026 | 4,077 | +4,077 | — |
| LAURITO JAMES P | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.5.2026 | 32,138 | +4,077 | — |
| Mulroy Patricia | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.5.2026 | 27,213 | +4,077 | — |
| Riddick Stephen A | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.5.2026 | 22,538 | +4,077 | — |
| Vicks Raymond Jr. | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.5.2026 | 22,220 | +4,077 | — |
| Grebbien Virginia Lee | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.5.2026 | 14,928 | +4,077 | — |
| Bowman Gary | Tax Withholding in Shares | 12.5.2026 | 1,127 | -1,127 | $34.07 |
| Vicks Raymond Jr. | Open Market Sale | 12.5.2026 | 1,230 | -1,230 | $33.34 |
| Bowman Gary | Tax Withholding in Shares | 12.5.2026 | 905,448 | -1,127 | $34.07 |
| Vicks Raymond Jr. | Open Market Sale | 12.5.2026 | 18,143 | -1,230 | $33.34 |
| Bowman Gary | Open Market Sale | 22.4.2026 | 7,500 | -7,500 | $30.71 |
| Bowman Gary | Open Market Sale | 22.4.2026 | 12,500 | -12,500 | $30.71 |
| Bowman Gary | Open Market Sale | 22.4.2026 | 906,575 | -12,500 | $30.71 |
| Bowman Gary | Open Market Sale | 22.4.2026 | 1,353,338 | -7,500 | $30.71 |
| Bowman Gary | Open Market Sale | 18.2.2026 | 7,500 | -7,500 | $32.62 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
587,121 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 523,912 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
23.5% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 48.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology