Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Discretionary · ·
$1.30
▼ $0.00 (-0.4%)
Market data updated: 09/24 07:06 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/24/2026
News analyzed: 09/24/2026
Market Cap
$21.33M
Day Range
$1.26 - $1.30
52-Week Range
$0.33 - $4.91
Beta
—
Next Earnings
18.11.2026
Support
$1.08
Resistance
$2.06
AZIO is a stock from the Consumer Cyclical sector — Retail, automotive, and leisure — demand rises and falls with economic sentiment and consumers' disposable income.
-38.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 10/32 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 217.6%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin
Operating margin: -651.3% (negative)
Fundamental
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
45
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
Not enough data yet to generate this synthesis.
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
40
Quality
47
Value
50
Momentum
48
Risk
32
Sentiment
62
Fundamental
34
Institutional
33
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Everyone's writing about Azio AI Holdings, Inc.. News trend score: 62. Reason: 2 of the last 3 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
19
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
29
Psychology
57
Fundamentals
34
Technical
48
Valuation
50
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-12%
Market Narrative
59
Fundamental Reality
29
Narrative Gap
+30
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 86/100
🔴 Weakest match
Thorstein Veblen — 27/100
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 86
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 81
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 67
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 63
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 47
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 46
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 45
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 45
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 33
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 33
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 32
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 31
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 31
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 27
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 0
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 20%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 286 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (5 bullish · 5 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
-222.2%
Operating Margin
-651.3%
Net Margin
-658.8%
EBITDA Margin
-635.1%
ROE
438.2%
ROA
-838.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$11.54
Cash
$358.97K
Total Debt
$485.77K
Current Ratio
0.26
Debt/Equity
-0.05
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$1.30
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$43.40
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
⚠️ Extreme
Model output is extreme — likely a data/model limitation for this stock, not a reliable fair-value read.
Year 1 Growth Rate
25.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.0% | $-7.21M | $-6.61M |
| 2 | 19.4% | $-8.60M | $-7.24M |
| 3 | 13.8% | $-9.78M | $-7.56M |
| 4 | 8.1% | $-10.58M | $-7.49M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-10.84M | $-7.05M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-5.76M
Terminal Value
$-171.00M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-111.14M
Enterprise Value
$-147.08M
Net Debt
$126.81K
Equity Value
$-147.21M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
-$2.63
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$2.63
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 2 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 3 articles.
Benzinga · 31.7.2026
Benzinga · 31.7.2026
Benzinga · 15.7.2026
Azio AI Holdings, Inc. (AZIO) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 45/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AZIO currently scores 45/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
AZIO's technical score is 48/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 217.6%; Return on equity (ROE): 438.2% — strong; Debt/equity: -0.05.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin: -651.3% (negative); Net margin: -658.8% (negative); Operating margin is eroding over time.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for AZIO.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 2 purchases and 4 sales out of the last 16 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chen Gary | Open Market Sale | 14.7.2026 | 194,690 | -4,867 | — |
| Young Chris J. | Open Market Sale | 14.7.2026 | 194,690 | -4,867 | — |
| Yang Jenny | Open Market Purchase | 14.7.2026 | 147,622 | +24,604 | — |
| Chen Gary | Open Market Sale | 14.7.2026 | 492,070 | -12,302 | — |
| Yang Jenny | Open Market Purchase | 14.7.2026 | 58,407 | +9,734 | — |
| Young Chris J. | Open Market Sale | 14.7.2026 | 492,070 | -12,302 | — |
| Young Chris J. | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.7.2026 | 504,372 | +504,372 | — |
| Young Chris J. | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.7.2026 | 199,557 | +199,557 | — |
| Chen Gary | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.7.2026 | 504,372 | +504,372 | — |
| Yang Jenny | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.7.2026 | 48,673 | +48,673 | — |
| Yu Simon | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.7.2026 | 116,814 | +116,814 | — |
| Shiue Chi-Wei David | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.7.2026 | 389,380 | +389,380 | — |
| Yu Simon | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.7.2026 | 295,242 | +295,242 | — |
| Yang Jenny | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.7.2026 | 123,018 | +123,018 | — |
| Shiue Chi-Wei David | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.7.2026 | 984,140 | +984,140 | — |
| Chen Gary | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.7.2026 | 199,557 | +199,557 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,181,600 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 833,466 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
42.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 48.7% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology