Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· · NYSE
$29.47
▲ $0.11 (+0.4%)
Market data updated: 09/22 01:45 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/22/2026
News analyzed: 09/22/2026
Market Cap
$5.57B
Day Range
$29.38 - $29.51
52-Week Range
$23.86 - $32.46
Beta
—
Next Earnings
22.10.2026
Support
$29.15
Resistance
$32.46
+11.8% (1Y)
Strengths: 8/22 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 284.7%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is below the 50-day average
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
50
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
66
Quality
55
Value
55
Momentum
23
Risk
64
Sentiment
74
Fundamental
50
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Associated Banc-Corp (ASB) has primarily focused on its upcoming investor presentation at the Barclays Global Financial Services Conference in September 2026, highlighting its strategic initiatives and growth outlook. Additionally, the company announced the appointment of Angela M.W. Kelley as its new General Counsel, succeeding Randall J. Erickson, who is retiring. No other substantive details about operations or financial performance were explicitly covered in the provided sources.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Associated Banc-Corp. News trend score: 74. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 7 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
21
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
52
Psychology
86
Fundamentals
50
Technical
23
Valuation
55
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-2%
Market Narrative
49
Fundamental Reality
52
Narrative Gap
-3
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
Market behavior suggests herding is the dominant psychological state, as ASB’s underperformance relative to peers (-1.8% vs -0.5%) implies traders are aligning with broader sector trends rather than independent conviction. Mild euphoria (6.4% above 200-day average) and FOMO (elevated volume, positive sentiment) coexist but are secondary, reflecting cautious optimism. The anchoring signal (4.2% from support) hints at traders fixating on prior levels, while the narrative gap (8-point divergence) suggests perceptions may outpace fundamentals. The key question: *Is the underperformance temporary sector lag or a shift in risk appetite?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 03:14 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Associated Banc-Corp (ASB) is a Top Dividend Stock Right Now: Should You Buy?"
"Management expects to meet with investors at the 24th Annual Barclays Global Financial Services Conference"
"Angela M.W. Kelley to join Associated Bank as General Counsel"
📈 13D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Thorstein Veblen — 23/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The highest scores from Peter Lynch, Edgar Lawrence Smith and Benjamin Graham (defensive) reflect a strong alignment with growth upside and defensive value criteria, leading the model to estimate that, based on their documented principles, the stock appears attractive. Investors emphasizing cycle timing, balance‑sheet robustness or disciplined risk‑reward such as Nelson, Bagehot, Mackay, Housel, Loeb, Schwager and Howard Marks give moderate scores, indicating the model estimates a cautiously favorable view but with reservations tied to their specific lenses. The more skeptical readings—from the efficient‑market perspective, Marks’s cycle view, Fisher, Livermore and Veblen—receive lower scores, as the model estimates they find insufficient data, unclear trends, or a growth‑for‑its‑own‑sake pattern that conflicts with their criteria. Consequently, the spread of conclusions stems from each methodology’s core focus—growth versus value, defensive versus enterprising, cycle versus behavioral considerations—resulting in a consensus of overall positivity tempered by notable caveats.
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 100
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 98
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 97
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 95
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 80
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 80
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 74
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 72
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 67
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 66
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 59
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 54
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 47
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 23
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 9 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
—
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
9.5%
ROA
1.1%
ROIC
—
EPS
$2.79
Cash
$1.72B
Total Debt
$1.31B
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
0.26
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 1.9.2026 | $0.240 |
| 1.6.2026 | $0.240 |
| 31.5.2026 | $0.240 |
| 2.3.2026 | $0.240 |
| 1.3.2026 | $0.240 |
| 1.12.2025 | $0.240 |
| 30.11.2025 | $0.240 |
| 2.9.2025 | $0.230 |
| 1.9.2025 | $0.230 |
| 2.6.2025 | $0.230 |
| 1.6.2025 | $0.230 |
| 3.3.2025 | $0.230 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$29.86
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$23.09
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 2 neutral, 7 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Zacks · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
Zacks · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Zacks · 8.9.2026
Zacks · 7.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
PR Newswire · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
PR Newswire · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
Zacks · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 31.8.2026
Zacks · 31.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 28.8.2026
Associated Banc-Corp (ASB) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 50/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ASB currently scores 50/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
ASB's technical score is 23/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 284.7%; Net income growth: 285.5%; ATR: 2.0% of price.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is below the 50-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; -4.0% over the last 3 months relative to the index.
Yes — ASB has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 7 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ahern Patrick Edward | Open Market Sale | 3.9.2026 | 1,209 | -1,209 | $30.85 |
| Ahern Patrick Edward | Open Market Sale | 3.9.2026 | 100 | -100 | $30.85 |
| Kitowski Nicole M | Other Transaction | 17.8.2026 | 23.453 | +23.453 | $32.21 |
| HLADIO JAYNE C | Other Transaction | 17.8.2026 | 12.019 | +12.019 | $32.21 |
| Manso Julio | Other Transaction | 17.8.2026 | 12.807 | +12.807 | $32.21 |
| ZANDPOUR STEVEN S. | Other Transaction | 17.8.2026 | 74.967 | +74.967 | $32.21 |
| Williams Terry Lynn | Other Transaction | 17.8.2026 | 71.181 | +71.181 | $32.21 |
| Utz John A. | Other Transaction | 17.8.2026 | 41.839 | +41.839 | $32.21 |
| Erickson Randall J. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.8.2026 | 43,561 | -43,561 | — |
| Erickson Randall J. | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 43,561 | -43,561 | $32.04 |
| Warsek Gregory | I | 12.8.2026 | 14,927 | -14,927 | — |
| Warsek Gregory | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 13,018 | -13,018 | $32.01 |
| Erickson Randall J. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.8.2026 | 43,561 | +43,561 | $20.32 |
| Warsek Gregory | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.8.2026 | 13,018 | -13,018 | — |
| Warsek Gregory | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 3,282 | -3,282 | $32.00 |
| Warsek Gregory | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.8.2026 | 13,018 | +13,018 | $26.00 |
| Erickson Randall J. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.8.2026 | 99,652 | +43,561 | $20.32 |
| Warsek Gregory | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 13,809 | -3,282 | $32.00 |
| Erickson Randall J. | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 56,091 | -43,561 | $32.04 |
| Warsek Gregory | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.8.2026 | 26,827 | +13,018 | $26.00 |
| Warsek Gregory | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.8.2026 | 0 | -13,018 | — |
| Erickson Randall J. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.8.2026 | 0 | -43,561 | — |
| Warsek Gregory | I | 12.8.2026 | 13,605 | -14,927 | — |
| Utz John A. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.8.2026 | 24,465 | +24,465 | $25.20 |
| Utz John A. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.8.2026 | 24,465 | -24,465 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
6,893,922 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 4,934,331 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
67.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 70.1% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology