Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· · CBOE
$86.92
▲ $3.74 (+4.5%)
Market data updated: 09/18 07:15 AM
News analyzed: 09/18/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$85.04 - $87.17
52-Week Range
$62.95 - $92.65
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
+7.7% (1Y)
⚠️ Insufficient data for a reliable StockIQ Score
Only 3 of 7 categories available — Fundamental, Growth, Valuation, Quality unavailable.
Strengths: 8/13 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
MACD
MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
ARKK’s overall score of 80 reflects a strong technical foundation tempered by mixed sentiment and elevated risk metrics. The technical category (89) is particularly robust, with the stock maintaining above-average momentum across both 50-day and 200-day moving averages, a positive MACD histogram, and an RSI of 58.4—all indicators of sustained upward pressure. However, the %K reading at 81.7 signals overbought conditions, which could limit further short-term gains. News sentiment (74) is cautiously positive, driven by Cathie Wood’s active portfolio adjustments and thematic bullishness around innovation and crypto, though a single negative note from ING introduces a counterbalance. The risk profile (50) stands out as a notable drag, with a high Calmar ratio (0.64) revealing volatility disproportionate to returns, underscored by a 39.6% max drawdown over three years despite a 25.1% annualized return. The interplay between these factors creates a dynamic where ARKK’s technical strength and thematic appeal are partially offset by structural volatility and overbought signals.
The stock exhibits strong momentum with prices above both 50-day and 200-day moving averages, a positive MACD histogram, and an RSI of 58.4, though it is currently overbought (%K 81.7).
Technical strength suggests near-term bullishness, but overbought conditions may signal impending consolidation or reversal.
News sentiment leans positive due to Cathie Wood’s active positioning and thematic optimism, though one negative central bank commentary introduces uncertainty.
Positive news supports long-term conviction, but mixed sentiment could reflect lingering skepticism about the ETF’s strategy.
The stock exhibits high volatility (ATR 2.8%) and a low Calmar ratio (0.64), indicating significant drawdowns relative to returns (39.6% max drawdown vs. 25.1% annualized return).
Elevated risk metrics suggest potential for sharp corrections, even amid strong returns.
StockIQ conclusion
ARKK demonstrates a compelling blend of technical strength and thematic appeal, supported by Cathie Wood’s active management and relative outperformance. However, its elevated risk profile—highlighted by volatility and overbought conditions—introduces meaningful uncertainty. The ETF’s score reflects a nuanced balance between near-term momentum and structural risks, with its trajectory dependent on both market conditions and the execution of Wood’s high-conviction strategy. Investors should weigh these factors against their risk tolerance and long-term conviction in disruptive innovation themes.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
75
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 26, 2026
Then
75
$86.37
Now
75
$86.92
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
75
Risk
50
Sentiment
86
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **ARK Innovation ETF** has centered on its underperformance compared to broader market benchmarks, with the fund delivering a **negative 7.5% annualized return over five years** while the S&P 500 rose 11.2% annually. The ETF’s heavy exposure to **Elon Musk’s companies (Tesla and X/Twitter)**, which together account for **16% of its holdings**, has drawn attention after one of them drove a significant portion of its recent decline. Additionally, Ark Invest’s recent **increased investments in Robinhood (HOOD) and crypto-linked assets** amid market volatility have been noted, alongside broader discussions about Cathie Wood’s high-conviction investment strategy and its continued relevance.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about ARK Innovation ETF. News trend score: 86. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 5 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
25
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
79
Fundamentals
—
Technical
75
Valuation
—
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+8%
Market Narrative
60
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+10
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
ARKK’s psychology is dominated by **anchoring**, as the stock’s proximity to resistance (1.9%) suggests traders are fixating on this level despite moderate momentum and euphoric sentiment. The **narrative-reality gap (17)** hints at a disconnect where optimism (67) exceeds technical reality (50), but anchoring overrides euphoria or FOMO. The key question: will traders break resistance or double down, or will the gap widen further? Momentum remains positive, but the 1.9% resistance gap may act as a psychological barrier. Overconfidence and loss aversion remain dormant, keeping behavior disciplined relative to extremes.
Updated: 09/07/2026, 05:41 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Cathie Wood's 2 biggest positions are both Elon Musk companies. Together they are 16% of the fund."
"ARK Innovation ETF has delivered a negative 7.5% annualized return over the past five years, while the S&P 500 gained 11.2% a year."
"The persistent underperformance of most ETFs in the family of funds is understandably raising questions."
📈 8D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 54/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 14/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The methodologies for **ARKK** reveal a stark divide between cautious, data-starved approaches and those wary of speculative momentum. Jesse Livermore’s neutral stance (62) contrasts sharply with the outright skepticism of Jack Schwager (35) and Samuel Armstrong Nelson (17), who see either no clear trend or an overbought cycle—both would likely avoid it entirely. Meanwhile, the value-focused schools (Graham, Fisher, Lynch) and balance-sheet analysts (Bagehot, Enterprising Graham) all score 50 due to insufficient fundamental data, suggesting they’d need more concrete metrics to form an opinion. Even the behavioral investor Charles Mackay (52) detects crowd excitement, hinting at speculative hype, while Howard Marks (40) and his market-cycle variant (37) warn of high expectations or late-cycle risks. The only moderate hold comes from Morgan Housel (41), implying it’s tolerable but not a standout—highlighting a consensus that ARKK’s appeal is either speculative or lacks the traditional fundamentals to justify aggressive bets.
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 56
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 54
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 50
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 43
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 42
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 42
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 32
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 25
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 14
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 14
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 277 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (8 bullish · 2 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 8.9.2023 | $0.364 |
| 29.12.2021 | $0.783 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 4 neutral, 5 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for ARKK specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
ARKK's technical score is 75/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average; RSI 58.8 — healthy positive momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; %K 92.8 — overbought.
Yes — ARKK has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 0 filings.
No recent insider transaction filings found for this stock.
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
24,486,030 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 24,945,865 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
63.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 55.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology