Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$28.28
▲ $2.88 (+11.3%)
Market data updated: 09/23 05:24 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/23/2026
News analyzed: 09/23/2026
Market Cap
$855.73M
Day Range
$25.77 - $28.32
52-Week Range
$17.01 - $54.34
Beta
—
Next Earnings
03.11.2026
Support
$23.35
Resistance
$37.07
AOSL is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
-8.2% (1Y)
Strengths: 13/32 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 57.3%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$27.52 vs. price $28.28 (-197.3%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
49
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
54
Quality
47
Value
38
Momentum
47
Risk
46
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
36
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited (AOSL) has primarily focused on its stock performance and market positioning within the semiconductor sector. Analysts have highlighted its exposure to emerging trends like 800-volt AI rack architectures, positioning it as a potential beneficiary of niche but growing demand. The company’s Q4 2026 earnings call was discussed, alongside a neutral rating and lowered price target ($34 from $38) by B. Riley Securities, reflecting cautious optimism amid sector volatility. Comparisons to broader tech stock underperformance were also noted.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited - Common. News trend score: 92. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
31
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
37
Psychology
53
Fundamentals
36
Technical
47
Valuation
38
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
-42%
Market Narrative
69
Fundamental Reality
37
Narrative Gap
+32
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant Loss Aversion (88) reflects a stock deeply entrenched in a downtrend, where investors cling to positions despite prolonged underperformance. The narrative gap (+13) and stagnant fundamentals (0.0% revenue/margin growth) suggest traders are selectively ignoring reality, reinforcing reluctance to exit. Low volatility (0.74x ATR) and subdued volume (0.84x avg) imply hesitation rather than panic, but the 3-month decline (-40%) anchors behavior. The key question: *Will the gap between narrative and fundamentals widen further, or will a catalyst force a re-evaluation?*
Updated: 09/05/2026, 03:14 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"The shift to 800-volt AI rack architectures is quietly creating winners in a corner of the chip market most investors overlook"
"B. Riley Securities analyst Craig Ellis maintains Alpha & Omega (NASDAQ:AOSL) with a Neutral and lowers the price target from $38 to $34"
📈 5D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Benjamin Graham — 99/100
🔴 Weakest match
Philip Fisher — 7/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s starkly divided verdicts reflect deep methodological disagreements about its fundamentals and market positioning. Benjamin Graham’s defensive and enterprising frameworks both rate it highly—100 and 83, respectively—suggesting strong intrinsic value and a statistical discount, while Walter Bagehot’s near-perfect score underscores its liquidity resilience. Meanwhile, cycle-focused investors like Nelson (86) and Marks (81) see it as undervalued relative to its position in the market, contrasting sharply with Fisher’s near-zero score (7), who dismisses it for lacking his signature growth and quality traits. The divide between high-scoring value/cycle investors and low-scoring trend-followers (like Livermore at 28) or efficiency skeptics (Bogle/Malkiel at 43) highlights whether the stock’s price already reflects its potential—or if it’s a speculative gamble rather than a disciplined bet.
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 99
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 97
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 79
Deep statistical discount — a real Enterprising Investor candidate
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 74
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 72
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 70
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 61
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 58
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 53
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 47
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 44
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 39
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 38
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 31
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 24
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 7
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (6 bullish · 6 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
22.3%
Operating Margin
-6.4%
Net Margin
-6.2%
EBITDA Margin
2.1%
ROE
-5.3%
ROA
-4.4%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$1.41
Cash
$180.77M
Total Debt
$3.63M
Current Ratio
3.44
Debt/Equity
0.00
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$28.28
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$27.52
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-197.3%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-0.5%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -0.5% | $-67.74M | $-62.14M |
| 2 | 0.3% | $-67.91M | $-57.16M |
| 3 | 1.0% | $-68.59M | $-52.96M |
| 4 | 1.8% | $-69.79M | $-49.44M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-71.53M | $-46.49M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-68.07M
Terminal Value
$-1.13B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-733.15M
Enterprise Value
$-1.00B
Net Debt
$-177.14M
Equity Value
$-824.20M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$26.64
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$26.60
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 9 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
Business Wire · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
Zacks · 27.8.2026
Yahoo · 25.8.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 25.8.2026
Motley Fool · 19.8.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 15.8.2026
Moby · 13.8.2026
MT Newswires · 13.8.2026
Benzinga · 13.8.2026
Benzinga · 13.8.2026
Benzinga · 13.8.2026
Benzinga · 13.8.2026
Benzinga · 13.8.2026
Benzinga · 13.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 13.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 12.8.2026
Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited - Common (AOSL) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 49/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AOSL currently scores 49/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, AOSL's estimated fair value is -$27.52, which is 197.3% below the current price of $28.28. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
AOSL's technical score is 47/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 57.3%; Net income growth: 56.4%; Debt/equity: 0.00.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$27.52 vs. price $28.28 (-197.3%); Operating margin: -6.4% (negative); Net margin: -6.2% (negative).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for AOSL.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 10 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chang Mike F | Gift | 13.8.2026 | 560,540 | -3,000,000 | — |
| Chang Mike F | Gift | 13.8.2026 | 3,000,000 | -3,000,000 | — |
| Chien Joshua C. | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.7.2026 | 1,368 | +1,368 | — |
| Chien Joshua C. | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.7.2026 | 1,368 | +1,368 | — |
| Xue Bing | Open Market Sale | 16.7.2026 | 875 | -875 | $33.99 |
| Xue Bing | Open Market Sale | 16.7.2026 | 122,785 | -875 | $33.99 |
| Chang Mike F | Gift | 13.7.2026 | 23,754 | -23,754 | — |
| Chang Mike F | Gift | 13.7.2026 | 3,560,540 | -23,754 | — |
| Xue Bing | Open Market Sale | 16.6.2026 | 4,916 | -4,916 | $47.09 |
| Xue Bing | Open Market Sale | 16.6.2026 | 123,660 | -4,916 | $47.09 |
| Chang Mike F | Gift | 1.6.2026 | 30,000 | -30,000 | — |
| Chang Mike F | Gift | 1.6.2026 | 3,584,294 | -30,000 | — |
| Chang Mike F | Gift | 26.5.2026 | 39,780 | -39,780 | — |
| Chang Mike F | Gift | 26.5.2026 | 3,614,294 | -39,780 | — |
| Chang Mike F | Gift | 22.5.2026 | 736,252 | -736,252 | — |
| Chen Claudia | Open Market Sale | 22.5.2026 | 3,844 | -3,844 | $39.47 |
| Chen Claudia | Open Market Sale | 22.5.2026 | 217 | -217 | $40.54 |
| Chen Claudia | Open Market Sale | 22.5.2026 | 28,409 | -3,844 | $39.47 |
| Chen Claudia | Open Market Sale | 22.5.2026 | 28,192 | -217 | $40.54 |
| Chang Mike F | Gift | 22.5.2026 | 3,654,074 | -736,252 | — |
| Chang Stephen Chunping | Gift | 21.5.2026 | 2,000 | -2,000 | — |
| Chang Stephen Chunping | Gift | 21.5.2026 | 634,070 | -2,000 | — |
| Xue Bing | Open Market Sale | 18.5.2026 | 4,916 | -4,916 | $41.00 |
| Xue Bing | Open Market Sale | 18.5.2026 | 127,701 | -4,916 | $41.00 |
| Liang Yifan | Gift | 28.4.2026 | 300 | -300 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
2,620,812 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 3,311,917 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
60.5% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 65.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology