Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$35.20
▼ $0.30 (-0.8%)
Market data updated: 09/22 01:48 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/22/2026
News analyzed: 09/22/2026
Market Cap
$6.56B
Day Range
$35.13 - $35.68
52-Week Range
$22.41 - $71.77
Beta
—
Next Earnings
28.10.2026
Support
$32.67
Resistance
$54.40
ALGM is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
+12.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 13/31 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 22.8%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $9.38 vs. price $35.20 (-73.4%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (82/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (38/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
53
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
82
Quality
63
Value
38
Momentum
35
Risk
46
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
39
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Allegro MicroSystems, Inc. (ALGM) has centered on its stock performance and valuation debates, with analysts suggesting the shares may be trading 33% below fair value based on growth potential. The company’s stock has seen volatility—recently gaining 2.95% in one day but declining 16.36% over 30 days and 24.03% over 90 days. It was also highlighted as part of a semiconductor rally tied to AI infrastructure and EV-related trends, alongside broader discussions on growth stocks facing valuation scrutiny.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Allegro MicroSystems, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
30
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
43
Psychology
80
Fundamentals
39
Technical
35
Valuation
38
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-36%
Market Narrative
75
Fundamental Reality
43
Narrative Gap
+32
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant Overconfidence (45) suggests traders are overestimating ALGM’s potential despite a stark disconnect between price (+289% above DCF) and fundamentals (EPS growth outpacing momentum). The narrative gap (28-point divergence) reinforces this, as extreme sentiment (100/100) persists amid weak technicals. Loss Aversion (43) may also linger, given the recent 21.1% drop, but the lack of panic (16) implies traders are more optimistic than defensive. The key question: *Is the overvaluation a function of speculative euphoria or a delayed fundamental correction?*
Updated: 09/08/2026, 11:12 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Shares across the semiconductor industry surged following the chipmaker's strong second-quarter beats on both revenue and profit"
"Growth boosts valuation multiples, but it doesn’t always last forever"
"The stock last closing at $36.61... with the 30 day share price return down 16.36% and the 90 day share price return down 24.03%"
"Allegro MicroSystems... tied to secular trends in EVs, chip manufacturing"
📈 5D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 92/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 35/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between growth-oriented and value-driven methodologies. Peter Lynch’s near-perfect score and verdict highlight ALGM as a 'growth candidate' where the stock price hasn’t yet reflected its potential, aligning with his focus on undervalued high-growth companies. Meanwhile, Nelson, Schwager, and Marks (cycle) also see favorable opportunities—whether through technical oversold conditions, disciplined setups, or early-cycle positioning—suggesting momentum or cyclical tailwinds. However, value investors like Graham (both Defensive and Enterprising) and Loeb reject the stock outright, with Graham’s low score reflecting its failure to meet his strict defensive metrics and Loeb flagging moderate capital risk. The split between Fisher’s 'solid but not exceptional' and Smith’s 'buy-and-hold candidate' further illustrates a middle ground: some see steady fundamentals, while others dismiss it as overhyped or lacking the premium quality Fisher sought. Even the efficient-market camp and Livermore’s trend-following rule lean skeptical, with the latter’s low score signaling a potential downtrend, contrasting sharply with the bullish growth narratives.
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 92
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 78
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 75
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 72
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 72
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 66
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 65
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 61
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 59
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 56
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 56
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 51
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 44
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 44
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 40
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 35
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 282 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 6 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
46.3%
Operating Margin
2.1%
Net Margin
-1.7%
EBITDA Margin
9.7%
ROE
-1.6%
ROA
-1.1%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$0.08
Cash
$168.75M
Total Debt
$287.28M
Current Ratio
3.45
Debt/Equity
0.30
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$35.20
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$9.38
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-73.4%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-0.1%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -0.1% | $124.74M | $114.44M |
| 2 | 0.5% | $125.41M | $105.55M |
| 3 | 1.2% | $126.90M | $97.99M |
| 4 | 1.8% | $129.24M | $91.56M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $132.47M | $86.10M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$124.89M
Terminal Value
$2.09B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$1.36B
Enterprise Value
$1.85B
Net Debt
$118.52M
Equity Value
$1.73B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$5.16
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$2.77
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 8 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
StockStory · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
StockStory · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 12.9.2026
StockStory · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 6.9.2026
Yahoo · 6.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
StockStory · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
StockStory · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 30.8.2026
MarketBeat · 30.8.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
StockStory · 28.8.2026
Yahoo · 25.8.2026
StockStory · 25.8.2026
Yahoo · 25.8.2026
Allegro MicroSystems, Inc. (ALGM) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 53/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ALGM currently scores 53/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, ALGM's estimated fair value is $9.38, which is 73.4% below the current price of $35.20. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
ALGM's technical score is 35/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 22.8%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 79.5%; Free cash flow growth: 468.8%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $9.38 vs. price $35.20 (-73.4%); Net margin: -1.7% (negative); ATR: 5.3% of price.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for ALGM.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 9 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raubacher Jennie | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | $45.32 |
| Hagen Erin | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 2,285 | -2,285 | $44.39 |
| Hagen Erin | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 31,052 | -2,285 | $44.39 |
| WHITE BRIAN C | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.8.2026 | 4,251 | +4,251 | — |
| MARTIN JOSEPH R | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.8.2026 | 4,251 | +4,251 | — |
| Suzuki Yoshihiro | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.8.2026 | 4,251 | +4,251 | — |
| Raubacher Jennie | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.8.2026 | 4,251 | +4,251 | — |
| Willett Robert | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.8.2026 | 4,251 | +4,251 | — |
| PUMA MARY G | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.8.2026 | 4,251 | +4,251 | — |
| Palepu Krishna G. | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.8.2026 | 4,251 | +4,251 | — |
| MARTIN JOSEPH R | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.8.2026 | 39,430 | +4,251 | — |
| PUMA MARY G | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.8.2026 | 21,734 | +4,251 | — |
| Palepu Krishna G. | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.8.2026 | 14,212 | +4,251 | — |
| Willett Robert | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.8.2026 | 4,251 | +4,251 | — |
| WHITE BRIAN C | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.8.2026 | 4,251 | +4,251 | — |
| Suzuki Yoshihiro | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.8.2026 | 217,811 | +4,251 | — |
| Raubacher Jennie | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.8.2026 | 4,251 | +4,251 | — |
| WHITE BRIAN C | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.6.2026 | 594 | +594 | — |
| WHITE BRIAN C | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.6.2026 | 594 | +594 | — |
| Madormo Richard | Open Market Sale | 3.6.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | $52.72 |
| Madormo Richard | Open Market Sale | 3.6.2026 | 69,687 | -5,000 | $52.72 |
| Coleman Troy | Open Market Sale | 22.5.2026 | 4,500 | -4,500 | $45.72 |
| Coleman Troy | Open Market Sale | 22.5.2026 | 77,476 | -4,500 | $45.72 |
| Webster Roald Graham | Open Market Sale | 21.5.2026 | 5,217 | -5,217 | $44.89 |
| Webster Roald Graham | Open Market Sale | 21.5.2026 | 13,106 | -5,217 | $44.89 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
12,822,951 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 11,062,440 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
46.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 44.7% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology