Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· · NASDAQ
$64.37
▲ $1.36 (+2.2%)
Market data updated: 09/18 09:51 AM
News analyzed: 09/18/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$63.94 - $64.47
52-Week Range
$44.46 - $70.26
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
+33.4% (1Y)
🟡 Moderate
Strengths: 7/13 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 1.7% of price
Risk
Biggest negative driver
MACD
MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
AIQ’s overall score of 85 reflects a strong technical foundation tempered by mixed risk and nuanced market sentiment. The technical category dominates with a score of 85, driven by clear bullish signals: the stock sits well above both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, indicating sustained upward momentum. The MACD histogram’s positive trend and an RSI of 57.1 further validate healthy positive momentum, though the %K at 78.4 suggests neutral short-term positioning. Meanwhile, the news category achieves a perfect score of 100, though the narrative is split—positive coverage like the 'AI Boom Eating Its Own Margins' contrasts with cautious or negative headlines about government policies and margin pressures. The risk category, however, drags the score down to 58, highlighting volatility concerns: the ATR of 1.8% of price and a Calmar ratio of 1.17 (with a 26.4% max drawdown) signal potential instability, especially given the falling volume despite price gains—a red flag for potential weakening institutional interest.
The stock exhibits strong bullish momentum, with prices above both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, a positive MACD histogram, and an RSI of 57.1—all indicators of sustained upward traction. The %K at 78.4 suggests neutral short-term positioning, but overall, the technicals are highly favorable.
Technical strength often precedes sustained price appreciation, making these indicators critical for validating long-term bullish potential.
News coverage is evenly split between neutral, positive, and negative tones, with mixed commentary on AI’s growth, margins, and regulatory influences. The presence of both bullish ('AI Boom') and bearish ('Governments Encouraging Industrial Robotic Growth') headlines creates ambiguity in sentiment.
News sentiment can drive volatility and investor perception, particularly in sectors like AI where regulatory and competitive dynamics are rapidly evolving.
The stock’s ATR of 1.8% of price and a Calmar ratio of 1.17 (with a 3-year annualized return of 30.7% but a 26.4% max drawdown) indicate moderate volatility and risk. Falling volume despite price gains further raises concerns about potential weakening liquidity or fading momentum.
High volatility and drawdowns can erode investor confidence, especially if volume trends continue to decline, signaling reduced participation.
StockIQ conclusion
AIQ demonstrates a compelling technical profile with clear bullish signals, supported by a mix of positive and neutral news coverage. However, the stock’s volatility, declining volume, and risk metrics introduce meaningful concerns that temper its overall appeal. Investors should monitor volume trends, regulatory developments, and technical indicators closely, as these factors could significantly alter the stock’s trajectory. While the high investor score suggests strong underlying fundamentals, the risk profile remains a critical consideration for any participation.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
57
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
59
Risk
58
Sentiment
50
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage on the **Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF** has focused on broader AI sector trends rather than the fund itself. Headlines highlight shifting dynamics in AI investments—from model vendors to downstream applications, margin pressures on hardware giants like Nvidia and Broadcom, and the commoditization of AI technology. Analysts discuss diversification strategies, such as ETFs offering exposure to AI without heavy reliance on single stocks, while noting macroeconomic factors like interest rates and corporate profits influencing market sentiment. The focus remains on AI’s evolving role in tech and finance.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF. News trend score: 50. Reason: The mix of positive and negative articles is balanced — 7 vs. 7 out of the last 20 articles.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
11
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
79
Fundamentals
—
Technical
59
Valuation
—
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-4%
Market Narrative
44
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
-6
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests traders are fixated on the 2.2% resistance gap, while positive momentum and euphoric sentiment create a cautious optimism. The narrative-reality gap (13 points) hints at overestimation of fundamentals, but anchoring dominates due to proximity to resistance. The key question is whether traders will break resistance or retreat, given the lack of panic or herding signals. Momentum alone may not sustain anchoring if sentiment shifts.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 03:47 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"AI ETFs offer diversified exposure to a booming industry, giving investors a way to navigate September volatility while staying invested in AI's growth."
"Value is shifting downstream from model vendors to software applications as AI becomes commoditized."
"AI-driven memory cost surge is squeezing Nvidia, Broadcom, NetApp & Cisco margins."
"Three ETFs can get retirees into the trade without the single-stock exposure that keeps advisors up at night."
📈 12D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 78/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jack Schwager — 18/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark contrast between methodologies here reveals a divide between those who prioritize qualitative patience and those who flag structural risks. Morgan Housel’s high score reflects his focus on quiet, long-term compounders—where AIQ’s steady growth might align with his preference for businesses that thrive without fanfare. Meanwhile, the majority of rule-based investors—from Graham to Schwager—struggle with insufficient data, either due to weak fundamentals, valuation uncertainty, or lack of clear trends, leading to neutral or negative verdicts. The cyclical caution of Marks (Market Cycle) and Nelson, paired with Schwager’s outright dismissal, suggests these models see AIQ as either overvalued or ill-suited for disciplined entry. The debate hinges on whether the stock’s growth potential (Housel’s lens) outweighs its speculative or late-cycle risks (Marks/Nelson’s perspective).
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 78
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 76
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 66
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 66
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 48
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 39
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 39
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 24
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 18
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 278 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (6 bullish · 3 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 30.12.2025 | $0.045 |
| 27.6.2025 | $0.049 |
| 30.12.2024 | $0.011 |
| 27.6.2024 | $0.043 |
| 28.12.2023 | $0.019 |
| 29.6.2023 | $0.030 |
| 29.12.2022 | $0.056 |
| 29.6.2022 | $0.056 |
| 30.12.2021 | $0.013 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 7 positive, 6 neutral, 7 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 12.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
MoneyShow · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
MoneyShow · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for AIQ specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
AIQ's technical score is 59/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 1.7% of price; Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; -2.8% over the last 3 months relative to the index; Price is below the SAR point — downtrend.
Yes — AIQ has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 0 filings.
No recent insider transaction filings found for this stock.
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,011,217 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 3,542,390 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
54.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 49.1% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology