Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Finance · ·
$220.15
▼ $3.14 (-1.4%)
Market data updated: 09/18 05:42 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/17/2026
News analyzed: 09/18/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$219.66 - $223.23
52-Week Range
$136.57 - $248.29
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.11.2026
+21.1% (1Y)
Strengths: 7/22 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.31 (3y annualized return 11.1% / max drawdown 35.8%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
58
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
54
Quality
50
Value
55
Momentum
63
Risk
36
Sentiment
98
Fundamental
47
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (Farmer Mac)** has centered on its strong financial performance, particularly in **Q2 2026**, where earnings and revenues exceeded estimates, including record transaction volumes and rising core earnings per share. Analysts upgraded the stock to a "strong buy," while leadership changes—such as naming **Nader Pasdar** as Executive Vice President—highlighted strategic shifts. Dividend declarations and sector comparisons with peers like Citigroup also drew attention. Overall, the focus remains on growth, valuation, and operational strength.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation. News trend score: 98. Reason: 9 of the last 15 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
32
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
37
Fundamentals
47
Technical
63
Valuation
55
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+23%
Market Narrative
66
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+16
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
Market behavior in AGM suggests Herding as the dominant state at a score of 42, as the stock gained +0.7% today compared to peer average gains of +0.1%. Evidence also indicates persistent enthusiasm, with price standing +20.8% above its 200-day average amidst strong news sentiment (80/100). A modest narrative gap of 7 points exists between narrative sentiment (57) and fundamental reality (50). The key open question is whether market behavior will remain decoupled from peers while EPS growth stays flat (+0.0%).
Updated: 09/06/2026, 07:27 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Federal Agricultural Mortgage Q2 Earnings and Revenues Surpass Estimates"
"Farmer Mac Declares Quarterly Dividends on Common and Preferred Stock"
"Farmer Mac (AGM) Rating Upgrade to Strong Buy"
"Record Volume and ... (Q2 2026) Earnings Call Highlights"
📈 4D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Benjamin Graham — 59/100
🔴 Weakest match
Peter Lynch — 1/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock splits the historical methodologies into two stark camps: a cautious middle ground and a resounding rejection. Benjamin Graham’s original and Enterprising Investor frameworks both flag it as risky—one calling it ‘mixed’ due to unclear valuation, the other dismissing it as statistically too expensive for even his more aggressive approach. Meanwhile, Mackay and the efficient-market camp see faint signs of speculative excitement or weak evidence for active picking, while Fisher and Smith acknowledge some potential but stop short of a full endorsement. On the other end, the most disciplined voices—like Lynch, Marks, and Schwager—pile on with near-unanimous warnings, with Lynch’s score near-zero and Marks labeling it late-cycle or overvalued. The divergence stems from whether the stock’s fundamentals or momentum pass basic screens (Graham’s mixed verdict) versus whether its volatility, risk profile, or lack of clear growth justify a pass (Lynch, Bagehot, or the quantitative wizards).
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 59
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 56
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 50
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 49
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 48
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 44
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 44
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 39
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 37
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 34
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 27
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 26
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 24
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 1
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 0
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 282 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (6 bullish · 3 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
—
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
12.1%
ROA
0.6%
ROIC
—
EPS
$16.73
Cash
$931.07M
Total Debt
$30.82B
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
17.93
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 15.9.2026 | $1.600 |
| 15.6.2026 | $1.600 |
| 16.3.2026 | $1.600 |
| 15.12.2025 | $1.500 |
| 15.9.2025 | $1.500 |
| 16.6.2025 | $1.500 |
| 14.3.2025 | $1.500 |
| 16.12.2024 | $1.400 |
| 16.9.2024 | $1.400 |
| 14.6.2024 | $1.400 |
| 14.3.2024 | $1.400 |
| 14.12.2023 | $1.100 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$156.51
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$156.51
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 5 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 15 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
Zacks · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
PR Newswire · 13.8.2026
PR Newswire · 12.8.2026
Zacks · 11.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 1.8.2026
MarketBeat · 1.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 31.7.2026
Zacks · 30.7.2026
MT Newswires · 30.7.2026
Associated Press · 30.7.2026
Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 58/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AGM currently scores 58/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
AGM's technical score is 63/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average; RSI 53.3 — healthy positive momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.31 (3y annualized return 11.1% / max drawdown 35.8%); Debt/equity: 17.93; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum.
Yes — AGM has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wilcher LaJuana S | Gift | 21.8.2026 | 225 | -225 | — |
| Wilcher LaJuana S | Gift | 21.8.2026 | 3,342 | -225 | — |
| Brinch Brian M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 3.8.2026 | 225 | -225 | $237.96 |
| Brinch Brian M | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 3.8.2026 | 939 | +939 | $120.38 |
| Brinch Brian M | Disposition to the Company | 3.8.2026 | 476 | -476 | $237.96 |
| Brinch Brian M | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 3.8.2026 | 939 | -939 | — |
| Brinch Brian M | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 3.8.2026 | 11,035 | +939 | $120.38 |
| Brinch Brian M | Disposition to the Company | 3.8.2026 | 10,334 | -476 | $237.96 |
| Brinch Brian M | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 3.8.2026 | 0 | -939 | — |
| Brinch Brian M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 3.8.2026 | 10,810 | -225 | $237.96 |
| Gales Amy H | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 101 | +101 | $199.27 |
| Sexton Robert G | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 42 | +42 | $199.27 |
| Engebretsen James R | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 86 | +86 | $199.27 |
| Ware Todd P | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 21 | +21 | $199.27 |
| McKissack Eric T | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 21 | +21 | $199.27 |
| Logan Lyle | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 46 | +46 | $199.27 |
| JUNKINS LOWELL | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 7 | +7 | $199.27 |
| Engebretsen James R | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 16,845 | +86 | $199.27 |
| McKissack Eric T | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 2,895 | +21 | $199.27 |
| Ware Todd P | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 4,495 | +21 | $199.27 |
| Logan Lyle | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 432 | +46 | $199.27 |
| Sexton Robert G | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 14,268 | +42 | $199.27 |
| JUNKINS LOWELL | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 10,934 | +7 | $199.27 |
| Gales Amy H | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 6,080 | +101 | $199.27 |
| Logan Lyle | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.5.2026 | 386 | +386 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
319,841 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 355,601 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
65.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 63.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology