Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$121.57
▼ $2.22 (-1.8%)
Market data updated: 09/18 12:50 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/18/2026
News analyzed: 09/18/2026
Market Cap
$8.51B
Day Range
$119.23 - $122.44
52-Week Range
$98.22 - $143.78
Beta
—
Next Earnings
29.10.2026
AGCO is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
+7.9% (1Y)
Strengths: 11/31 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 271.4%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is eroding over time
Quality
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 1 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 1
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
62
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
68
Quality
42
Value
55
Momentum
69
Risk
42
Sentiment
86
Fundamental
56
Institutional
11
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of AGCO Corporation has centered on its introduction of the **Massey Ferguson N-Series split and narrow-row planters** at the 2026 Farm Progress Show, emphasizing precision planting technology and modular designs tailored for farmers. The stock has seen significant volatility, with strong gains (13.45% weekly, 17.37% monthly) and a 15.91% one-year return, though it was also flagged as a "Strong Sell" by Zacks. Analysts and options market activity suggest mixed investor sentiment, with discussions on valuation and future capital intensity trends.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about AGCO Corporation. News trend score: 86. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
20
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
36
Psychology
38
Fundamentals
56
Technical
69
Valuation
55
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+5%
Market Narrative
65
Fundamental Reality
36
Narrative Gap
+29
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
AGCO’s market behavior suggests a dominant FOMO-driven rally, amplified by extreme momentum, overbought conditions, and perfect sentiment. The narrative gap (56) and overvaluation (+21% vs. DCF) may reinforce confirmation bias and overconfidence, while anchoring near resistance keeps traders near entry/exit points. The key open question: *Will momentum sustain despite fundamental disconnects?*
Updated: 09/06/2026, 07:26 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"AGCO (AGCO) introduced the new Massey Ferguson™ N-Series split/narrow row planters... combining factory-installed Precision Planting™ technology"
"AGCO shares recently gained 13.45% over the past week and 17.37% over the past month"
"AGCO, AFYA and ASEKY have been added to the Zacks Rank #5 (Strong Sell) List"
"Staging its global tractor and planter launches in North America marks a deliberate signal of the company's growth agenda for the region"
📈 4D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 72/100
🔴 Weakest match
Walter Bagehot — 33/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
AGCO splits the historical methodologies into two stark camps: the bullish camp, led by Jesse Livermore (83) and Peter Lynch (72), sees clear momentum and growth potential, respectively, while the bearish end, anchored by Samuel Armstrong Nelson (0) and Howard Marks (cycle, 21), warns of overvaluation or late-cycle risks. The middle ground—where most methodologies cluster—reflects caution, with scores like Thorstein Veblen (59) questioning whether growth translates to profit and Benjamin Graham (40) dismissing it as too risky for defensive investors. Fisher (36) and Bagehot (33) further downplay its quality or liquidity, while even the efficient-market camp (47) finds little evidence to justify picking AGCO over passive indexing. The divide highlights a tension between momentum-driven optimism and structural concerns about valuation or market positioning.
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 72
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 64
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 59
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 57
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 56
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 54
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 53
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 51
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 51
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 48
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 45
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 38
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 38
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 36
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 35
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 33
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 262 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (7 bullish · 3 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
25.5%
Operating Margin
5.9%
Net Margin
7.2%
EBITDA Margin
5.9%
ROE
17.0%
ROA
6.1%
ROIC
—
EPS
$9.76
Cash
$861.80M
Total Debt
$2.44B
Current Ratio
1.39
Debt/Equity
0.57
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 14.8.2026 | $0.300 |
| 15.5.2026 | $0.300 |
| 13.2.2026 | $0.290 |
| 14.11.2025 | $0.290 |
| 15.8.2025 | $0.290 |
| 15.5.2025 | $0.290 |
| 14.2.2025 | $0.290 |
| 15.11.2024 | $0.290 |
| 15.8.2024 | $0.290 |
| 17.5.2024 | $2.500 |
| 14.5.2024 | $0.290 |
| 14.2.2024 | $0.290 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$121.57
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$110.07
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-9.5%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-5.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -5.0% | $703.19M | $645.13M |
| 2 | -3.1% | $681.22M | $573.37M |
| 3 | -1.2% | $672.70M | $519.45M |
| 4 | 0.6% | $676.90M | $479.54M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $693.83M | $450.94M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$740.20M
Terminal Value
$10.94B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$7.11B
Enterprise Value
$9.78B
Net Debt
$1.58B
Equity Value
$8.20B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$57.36
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$22.84
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 10 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.9.2026
Bloomberg · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
Benzinga · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Zacks · 9.9.2026
MT Newswires · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Business Wire · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 7.9.2026
MarketBeat · 7.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 4.9.2026
AGCO Corporation (AGCO) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 62/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AGCO currently scores 62/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, AGCO's estimated fair value is $110.07, which is 9.5% below the current price of $121.57. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
AGCO's technical score is 69/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 271.4%; Free cash flow growth: 149.6%; Net income growth: 271.0%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is eroding over time; Calmar: -0.02 (3y annualized return -0.8% / max drawdown 39.6%); Revenue growth (last year): -13.5%.
Yes — AGCO has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 1 purchases and 8 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bennett Kelvin Eugene | Open Market Sale | 4.9.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | $132.89 |
| Hansotia Eric P | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.9.2026 | 9,750 | -9,750 | — |
| Hansotia Eric P | Open Market Sale | 4.9.2026 | 2,604 | -2,604 | $129.75 |
| Hansotia Eric P | Tax Withholding in Shares | 4.9.2026 | 7,146 | -7,146 | $129.85 |
| Hansotia Eric P | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.9.2026 | 9,750 | +9,750 | $72.74 |
| De Lange Bob | Open Market Purchase | 14.8.2026 | 1,000 | +1,000 | $100.71 |
| Bennett Kelvin Eugene | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 15,047 | -2,000 | $102.27 |
| Bennett Kelvin Eugene | Open Market Sale | 6.8.2026 | 2,000 | -2,000 | $102.27 |
| Tractors & Farm Equipment Ltd | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 8,217,579 | -360,163 | $115.33 |
| Tractors & Farm Equipment Ltd | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 3,017,565 | -132,255 | $115.33 |
| Tractors & Farm Equipment Ltd | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 360,163 | -360,163 | $115.33 |
| Tractors & Farm Equipment Ltd | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 132,255 | -132,255 | $115.33 |
| Audia Damon J | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.7.2026 | 50,476 | +146 | $107.73 |
| Hansotia Eric P | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.7.2026 | 326,583 | +236 | $107.73 |
| Bennett Kelvin Eugene | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.7.2026 | 17,047 | +203 | $107.73 |
| Harris Ivory Marie | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.7.2026 | 16,054 | +47 | $107.73 |
| Sorbe Brian James | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.7.2026 | 2,860 | +22 | $107.73 |
| Harris Ivory Marie | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.7.2026 | 46.877 | +46.877 | $107.73 |
| Hansotia Eric P | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.7.2026 | 236.206 | +236.206 | $107.73 |
| Bennett Kelvin Eugene | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.7.2026 | 202.669 | +202.669 | $107.73 |
| Sorbe Brian James | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.7.2026 | 22.046 | +22.046 | $107.73 |
| Audia Damon J | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.7.2026 | 145.559 | +145.559 | $107.73 |
| Agarwal Indira | Tax Withholding in Shares | 10.7.2026 | 11,825 | -1,734 | $114.32 |
| Agarwal Indira | Tax Withholding in Shares | 10.7.2026 | 1,734 | -1,734 | $114.32 |
| Barbour Sondra L | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 12,954 | +33 | $116.71 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
3,636,672 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 3,236,122 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
63.8% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 73.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology