Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· ·
$30.62
▼ $0.00 (-0.0%)
Market data updated: 10/01 01:25 AM
Fundamentals updated: 10/01/2026
News analyzed: 10/01/2026
Market Cap
$496.92M
Day Range
$30.50 - $30.90
52-Week Range
$28.26 - $34.81
Beta
—
Next Earnings
04.11.2026
Support
$30.37
Resistance
$34.81
+0.7% (1Y)
Strengths: 2/29 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin
Operating margin: 35.8% — strong
Fundamental
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is eroding over time
Quality
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
37
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
40
Quality
42
Value
50
Momentum
6
Risk
34
Sentiment
62
Fundamental
51
Institutional
93
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of The York Water Company has highlighted its strong financial performance and long-standing dividend reliability. Headlines emphasize its 200-year dividend history, making it a standout "Dividend Champion" stock, while recent earnings reports (Q2 2026) showed beating analyst estimates—earnings per share rose 40% year-over-year to $0.49, alongside sales exceeding projections. The company remains a niche but consistent dividend pick for investors.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about The York Water Company. News trend score: 62. Reason: 2 of the last 3 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
26
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
36
Psychology
84
Fundamentals
51
Technical
6
Valuation
50
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-3%
Market Narrative
40
Fundamental Reality
36
Narrative Gap
+4
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 98/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 4/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s starkly divided verdicts reflect a deep chasm between methodologies prioritizing cyclical momentum and those demanding fundamental or defensive strength. At the top, Nelson, Mackay, and Schwager all see it as a high-probability setup—Nelson spots a favorable cycle position, Mackay detects no crowd-driven mania, and Schwager approves of its disciplined reward/risk profile. Meanwhile, the bottom half—especially Graham, Lynch, and Bagehot—reject it outright, with Graham calling it fundamentally unsound and Bagehot flagging liquidity risks. Even Marks, who splits his verdict, leans cautious, suggesting the stock may already be priced for growth. The contrast underscores whether the stock’s appeal lies in technical or cyclical patterns (favored by the top scorers) or whether it fails the rigorous, defensive filters of value investors.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 98
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 94
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 86
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 65
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 57
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 51
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 48
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 46
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 41
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 37
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 34
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 29
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 28
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 17
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 16
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 4
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 288 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 11 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a trading range, but the picture isn't yet clear enough on the likely direction.
Low confidence
$30.37
Range Bottom
$34.81
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
35.8%
Net Margin
25.9%
EBITDA Margin
54.1%
ROE
8.3%
ROA
2.9%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.39
Cash
$1.00K
Total Debt
$222.23M
Current Ratio
0.67
Debt/Equity
0.92
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 30.9.2026 | $0.228 |
| 30.6.2026 | $0.228 |
| 27.2.2026 | $0.228 |
| 31.12.2025 | $0.228 |
| 30.9.2025 | $0.219 |
| 30.6.2025 | $0.219 |
| 28.2.2025 | $0.219 |
| 31.12.2024 | $0.219 |
| 30.9.2024 | $0.211 |
| 28.6.2024 | $0.211 |
| 28.2.2024 | $0.211 |
| 28.12.2023 | $0.211 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$16.69
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$16.69
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 2 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 3 articles.
Yahoo · 30.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 25.9.2026
Benzinga · 6.8.2026
The York Water Company (YORW) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 37/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
YORW currently scores 37/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
YORW's technical score is 6/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin: 35.8% — strong; Net margin: 25.9% — strong.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is eroding over time; Current ratio: 0.67; Calmar: -0.20 (3y annualized return -6.0% / max drawdown 29.8%).
Yes — YORW has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 13 purchases and 1 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brossman Douglas S | Open Market Purchase | 21.9.2026 | 514 | +30 | $32.99 |
| Poff Matthew E | Open Market Purchase | 27.8.2026 | 9,532 | +30 | $34.19 |
| Brossman Douglas S | Open Market Purchase | 20.8.2026 | 484 | +30 | $33.19 |
| Hand Joseph Thomas | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 35,308 | -8,000 | $33.28 |
| Brossman Douglas S | Open Market Purchase | 20.7.2026 | 454 | +32 | $30.99 |
| Hand Joseph Thomas | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.7.2026 | 35,308 | +112 | $29.11 |
| Becker Suzanne M | Open Market Purchase | 16.7.2026 | 374 | +45 | $29.11 |
| Chiaruttini Alexandra C | Open Market Purchase | 16.7.2026 | 5,930 | +45 | $29.11 |
| Hand Joseph Thomas | Open Market Purchase | 16.7.2026 | 43,308 | +112 | $29.11 |
| Poff Matthew E | Open Market Purchase | 16.7.2026 | 9,502 | +4 | $29.11 |
| Scarpato Matthew J | Open Market Purchase | 16.7.2026 | 2,697 | +112 | $29.11 |
| Snyder Mark S | Open Market Purchase | 16.7.2026 | 4,930 | +11 | $29.11 |
| Hand Joseph Thomas | Open Market Purchase | 19.6.2026 | 42,866 | +25 | $29.53 |
| Yanavitch William T. II | Open Market Purchase | 20.5.2026 | 352 | +256 | $29.35 |
| Scarpato Matthew J | Open Market Purchase | 8.5.2026 | 2,570 | +700 | $29.30 |
| Keller Jody L | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.5.2026 | 4,917 | +154 | $29.14 |
| Bonney Paul R | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.5.2026 | 676 | +154 | $29.14 |
| Wand Laura T | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.5.2026 | 929 | +154 | $29.14 |
| McGlaughlin Erin C | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.5.2026 | 3,000 | +154 | $29.14 |
| Rasmussen Steven R | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.5.2026 | 4,828 | +154 | $29.14 |
| Yanavitch William T. II | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.5.2026 | 96 | +51 | $29.14 |
| Brossman Douglas S | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.5.2026 | 418 | +154 | $29.14 |
| Lambert Robert F | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.5.2026 | 230 | +154 | $29.14 |
| Hand Joseph Thomas | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.5.2026 | 42,841 | +1,509 | — |
| Poff Matthew E | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.5.2026 | 9,425 | +974 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
600,593 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 619,147 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
50.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 54.1% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology