Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· · NYSE
$480.49
▲ $5.87 (+1.2%)
Market data updated: 09/15 11:41 PM
News analyzed: 09/15/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$475.90 - $485.00
52-Week Range
$280.83 - $658.14
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
+58.9% (1Y)
🔴 Weak
Strengths: 3/13 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 200
Price is above the 200-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is below the 50-day average
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 1 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 1
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
XSD’s overall investor score of 43, accompanied by a 'WEAK' rating, reflects a mixed but predominantly cautious technical and risk profile, tempered by a relatively stronger news sentiment. The technical indicators paint a picture of short-term weakness, with the stock trading below its 50-day average and exhibiting negative momentum via a declining MACD histogram, alongside a neutral RSI and %K. These factors underscore a downtrend, reinforced by the price sitting below the SAR point, which suggests bearish pressure. However, the stock’s position above its 200-day average indicates some long-term resilience. Meanwhile, the risk category reveals volatility metrics (ATR: 3.7%) and a historically volatile performance (Calmar ratio: 0.78, with a 41.4% max drawdown), signaling potential instability. Despite this, the news category stands out with a score of 68, driven by positive sector updates and broader tech market tailwinds, including AI-driven growth narratives and earnings breadth, which could mitigate some of the technical headwinds if sustained.
The stock is trading below its 50-day average and SAR point, with a negative MACD histogram and RSI of 46.1, indicating short-term weakness and falling momentum. However, it remains above its 200-day average, suggesting some long-term support.
Short-term technical signals dominate the outlook, signaling potential downward pressure, while the 200-day average provides a counterbalance for longer-term investors.
The news category is overwhelmingly positive, with multiple sector updates highlighting gains in tech stocks and broader AI-driven growth, alongside positive earnings breadth.
Positive news sentiment could offset technical concerns by attracting investor interest or driving short-term rallies, especially if sector trends continue.
The stock exhibits moderate volatility (ATR: 3.7%) and a historically volatile performance (Calmar ratio: 0.78, with a 3-year annualized return of 32.3% but a 41.4% max drawdown), indicating potential for sharp swings.
High volatility and past drawdowns suggest the stock carries significant risk, particularly for investors sensitive to price fluctuations or drawdowns.
StockIQ conclusion
XSD’s profile is defined by a technical weakness in the short term, tempered by positive sector news and long-term support. While the stock’s position above its 200-day average offers a degree of resilience, concerns over momentum, volatility, and downtrend signals create a cautious outlook. Investors should monitor sector trends and volatility metrics closely, as these could either stabilize or exacerbate the current challenges. The risk-reward balance hinges on whether positive news can sustain momentum or if technical indicators shift decisively.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
40
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
today · $474.62
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from 11 to -17 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
41
Risk
50
Sentiment
32
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of the **State Street SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (SOXX)** has focused on its strong performance within the broader tech sector, particularly its nearly **60% year-to-date price gain**, closely aligned with earnings growth in the semiconductor industry. Headlines highlight broad tech stock gains, including SOXX, amid positive fundamentals and AI-driven demand, though some firms like Nvidia and Broadcom face margin pressures due to rising memory costs. The ETF’s resilience and sector-wide strength remain key themes.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about State Street SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF. News trend score: 32. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are negative, versus 6 positive.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
17
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
34
Fundamentals
—
Technical
41
Valuation
—
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-20%
Market Narrative
33
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
-17
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for XSD suggests a mixed but cautious sentiment, with no single dominant state. Loss aversion (13) and detached euphoria (15) coexist, reflecting traders clinging to gains above the 200-day average despite recent declines. The narrow narrative gap (-1) implies a balanced perception of reality, though the lack of volatility (0.72x ATR) contrasts with elevated volume. The key question is whether traders will sustain anchoring to past highs or shift toward loss-averse selling as momentum remains negative (-2.4%).
Updated: 09/06/2026, 06:26 AM
👥 What the crowd believes
"Tech stocks were higher late Friday afternoon, with the State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (X"
"Sector Update: Tech Stocks Rise Late Afternoon — Tech stocks were higher late Friday afternoon, with the State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 4D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 90/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 5/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with only a handful offering any confidence while the rest either dismiss it outright or express deep caution. Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s high score suggests a cyclical opportunity, seeing it as closer to oversold than overbought, but most other analysts lack the data to form a definitive view—Graham, Fisher, Lynch, and Veblen all return neutral scores due to insufficient fundamentals or growth metrics. Meanwhile, Morgan Housel’s low score highlights volatility that could unsettle patient investors, while Howard Marks and Gerald Loeb flag moderate risks, either from inflated expectations or capital exposure. The contrast between Nelson’s bullish cycle reading and the rest’s skepticism underscores how this stock’s uncertain fundamentals and market positioning leave it in a contentious gray zone.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 90
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 89
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 79
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 66
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 57
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 52
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 38
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 38
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 5
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 275 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 7 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 22.6.2026 | $0.233 |
| 23.3.2026 | $0.180 |
| 22.12.2025 | $0.206 |
| 22.9.2025 | $0.159 |
| 23.6.2025 | $0.264 |
| 24.3.2025 | $0.200 |
| 23.12.2024 | $0.109 |
| 23.9.2024 | $0.169 |
| 24.6.2024 | $0.135 |
| 18.3.2024 | $0.079 |
| 18.12.2023 | $0.192 |
| 18.9.2023 | $0.141 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 6 positive, 5 neutral, 9 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
MT Newswires · 10.9.2026
MT Newswires · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
MT Newswires · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Zacks · 10.9.2026
MT Newswires · 10.9.2026
MT Newswires · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
MT Newswires · 9.9.2026
MT Newswires · 9.9.2026
MT Newswires · 9.9.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for State Street SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for XSD specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
XSD's technical score is 41/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 200-day average; MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum; Price is above the SAR point — uptrend.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is below the 50-day average; -21.9% over the last 3 months relative to the index; %K 19.0 — oversold.
Yes — XSD has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 0 filings.
No recent insider transaction filings found for this stock.
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
170,430 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 103,933 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
69.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 56.2% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology