Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Utilities · ·
$72.45
▼ $1.18 (-1.6%)
Market data updated: 09/18 05:42 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/17/2026
News analyzed: 09/18/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$72.38 - $73.26
52-Week Range
$71.80 - $84.23
Beta
—
Next Earnings
28.10.2026
XEL is a stock from the Utilities sector — Electricity, water, and residential gas — steady demand and heavy regulation, considered a defensive, dividend-paying sector.
+2.2% (1Y)
Strengths: 1/25 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 1.9% of price
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Liquidity risk
Current ratio: 0.71
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
38
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
46
Quality
50
Value
50
Momentum
12
Risk
42
Sentiment
62
Fundamental
36
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING XEL...
Recent media coverage of Xcel Energy has centered on its **dividend reliability** amid financial and regulatory pressures, including wildfire lawsuits and high interest rates, while highlighting its **$60+ billion investment plan** for 2026–2030 to boost energy infrastructure and earnings growth. The company is also expanding its **energy storage and EV charging partnerships** with Xos, securing follow-on orders in Colorado and exploring growth opportunities in **Texas and New Mexico** to strengthen its utility operations.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Xcel Energy. News trend score: 62. Reason: 7 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 5 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
12
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
64
Fundamentals
36
Technical
12
Valuation
50
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-5%
Market Narrative
46
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
-4
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
XEL’s dominant *anchoring* (44) reflects traders focusing on the 2.8% proximity to support, ignoring broader weakness. Herding (37) hints at selective peer alignment, while FOMO/Panic Selling scores remain low, consistent with cautious behavior. The slight narrative gap (-4) suggests minor misalignment between market perception and fundamentals. The key question: will traders break free from support anchors or reinforce them?
Updated: 09/09/2026, 09:41 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"wildfire lawsuits, a $60 billion spending plan, and a 10-Year Treasury above 4% raise fair questions about whether [dividend streak] holds"
"Xcel Energy is positioned for accelerated growth via its SPS utility, with investment planned for Texas and New Mexico"
"$70B-plus 2026-2030 investment plan targets 11% rate-base CAGR and 6-8% annual earnings growth through 2030"
"Xos Hub™ Surpasses One Gigawatt-Hour of Energy Delivered in the Field"
📈 16D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 95/100
🔴 Weakest match
Peter Lynch — 2/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The methodologies for XEL split sharply between those emphasizing technical or cyclical positioning and those focused on fundamentals, valuation, or risk. Mackay and Nelson, both favoring crowd psychology and cycle analysis, score highly (95 and 93), suggesting the stock may be undervalued relative to its historical cycle or lacks speculative mania. In contrast, Graham, Lynch, and Bagehot—who prioritize valuation, growth, and liquidity—score poorly (20, 2, and 5), dismissing it as overpriced or structurally risky. Meanwhile, Schwager and Marks (cycle) see a disciplined setup with favorable risk/reward, while Marks (general) and Fisher remain cautious due to perceived high expectations or insufficient fundamentals. The divide underscores whether XEL’s appeal lies in its market timing or its underlying business fundamentals.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 95
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 92
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 71
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 70
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 56
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 50
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 41
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 39
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 36
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 31
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 25
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 25
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 5
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 5
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 2
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 279 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 10 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
—
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
8.5%
ROA
2.5%
ROIC
—
EPS
$3.44
Cash
$274.00M
Total Debt
$33.38B
Current Ratio
0.71
Debt/Equity
1.41
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 15.6.2026 | $0.593 |
| 14.6.2026 | $0.593 |
| 13.3.2026 | $0.593 |
| 12.3.2026 | $0.593 |
| 29.12.2025 | $0.570 |
| 28.12.2025 | $0.570 |
| 15.9.2025 | $0.570 |
| 14.9.2025 | $0.570 |
| 13.6.2025 | $0.570 |
| 12.6.2025 | $0.570 |
| 14.3.2025 | $0.570 |
| 13.3.2025 | $0.570 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$40.08
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$40.08
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 7 positive, 8 neutral, 5 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 11.9.2026
Benzinga · 5.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 4.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 1.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 28.8.2026
MT Newswires · 26.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 26.8.2026
Yahoo · 26.8.2026
Zacks · 26.8.2026
Benzinga · 26.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 25.8.2026
Yahoo · 22.8.2026
Xcel Energy (XEL) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 38/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
XEL currently scores 38/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
XEL's technical score is 12/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 1.9% of price.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Current ratio: 0.71; Calmar: 0.35 (3y annualized return 8.3% / max drawdown 24.0%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -0.6%.
Yes — XEL has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carter Peter W | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.7.2026 | 1,818.74 | +1,818.74 | — |
| Carter Peter W | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.7.2026 | 1,819 | +1,819 | — |
| Welsh Timothy A | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.6.2026 | 468.065 | +468.065 | — |
| Burkhart Megan D | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.6.2026 | 583.728 | +583.728 | — |
| Pardee Charles G | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.6.2026 | 541.031 | +541.031 | — |
| Casey Lynn | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.6.2026 | 492.521 | +492.521 | — |
| KAMPLING PATRICIA L | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.6.2026 | 607.783 | +607.783 | — |
| Kehl George J | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 2,253.944 | +2,253.944 | — |
| Burkhart Megan D | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 2,253.944 | +2,253.944 | — |
| Pardee Charles G | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 2,253.944 | +2,253.944 | — |
| Stockfish Devin W | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 2,253.944 | +2,253.944 | — |
| Casey Lynn | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 2,253.944 | +2,253.944 | — |
| Johnson Netha N. | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 2,253.944 | +2,253.944 | — |
| Hutchinson Maria Demaree | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 2,253.944 | +2,253.944 | — |
| KAMPLING PATRICIA L | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 2,253.944 | +2,253.944 | — |
| Welsh Timothy A | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 2,253.944 | +2,253.944 | — |
| KAMPLING PATRICIA L | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 24,551 | +2,254 | — |
| Burkhart Megan D | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 23,257 | +2,254 | — |
| Pardee Charles G | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 33,311 | +2,254 | — |
| Johnson Netha N. | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 19,340 | +2,254 | — |
| Stockfish Devin W | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 7,798 | +2,254 | — |
| Welsh Timothy A | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 17,018 | +2,254 | — |
| Casey Lynn | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 43,123 | +2,254 | — |
| Kehl George J | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 19,425 | +2,254 | — |
| Hutchinson Maria Demaree | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 3,234 | +2,254 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
41,224,049 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 42,456,946 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
59.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 53.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology