Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Real Estate · ·
$21.22
▼ $0.44 (-2.0%)
Market data updated: 09/20 10:53 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$15.29B
Day Range
$21.20 - $21.60
52-Week Range
$21.16 - $27.75
Beta
—
Next Earnings
28.10.2026
Support
$21.20
Resistance
$26.00
WY is a stock from the Real Estate sector — REITs and real-estate companies — highly sensitive to interest rates and property prices.
-13.5% (1Y)
Strengths: 1/33 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Golden Cross
SMA 50 recently crossed above SMA 200
Technical
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $2.27 vs. price $21.22 (-89.3%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
35
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
26
Quality
42
Value
33
Momentum
14
Risk
42
Sentiment
80
Fundamental
43
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
SCANNING WY...
Recent media coverage of Weyerhaeuser has primarily focused on its financial outlook amid high interest rates and market volatility. Analysts like JPMorgan have maintained an **Overweight** rating but lowered their price target to $28, citing pressure from elevated borrowing costs weakening housing and lumber demand. The company declared a **quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share** in August, signaling continued shareholder returns despite economic headwinds. Overall, the narrative centers on cautious optimism, with demand recovery expected in 2027.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Weyerhaeuser. News trend score: 80. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
34
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
36
Psychology
98
Fundamentals
43
Technical
14
Valuation
33
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-13%
Market Narrative
58
Fundamental Reality
36
Narrative Gap
+22
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant anchoring behavior (76) reflects traders’ fixation on the stock’s proximity to support (1.2%), overriding other conflicting signals. Overconfidence (45) and confirmation bias (39) persist due to extreme valuation (+899% DCF) despite weak momentum and stagnant fundamentals. The narrative-reality gap (+30) further fuels selective attention to positive sentiment (92/100) while ignoring divergence in performance. The key question remains whether traders will hold or adjust positions as the stock tests support, given the disconnect between price action and fundamentals.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 09:45 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"JP Morgan maintains Weyerhaeuser (NYSE:WY) with an Overweight rating"
"Weyerhaeuser declared a quarterly base cash dividend of $0.21 per share"
"high rates weaken housing and delay lumber demand recovery to 2027"
"Weyerhaeuser (WY) Could Be 18% Undervalued On Its Latest Earnings Beat"
📈 10D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 99/100
🔴 Weakest match
Philip Fisher — 7/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among historical methodologies, with scores ranging from a near-perfect 99 under Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s cycle-based approach—who sees it as oversold and poised for a rebound—to a dismal 7 under Philip Fisher, who dismisses it for lacking the quality and growth traits he demanded. Technical traders like Jack Schwager (81) and Charles Mackay (65) find it a disciplined setup with early crowd excitement, while contrarian voices like Jesse Livermore (27) and Benjamin Graham (26) reject it outright, citing negative trends and defensive failures. Meanwhile, efficiency skeptics like Howard Marks (38) and Morgan Housel (39) warn of volatility and valuation risks, while Veblen (21) and Lynch (19) see it as speculative growth without substance. The contrast highlights a tension between cyclical optimism, technical setups, and fundamental skepticism—where even moderate-risk methodologies like Loeb (48) and Smith (51) remain cautiously neutral.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 99
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 88
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 72
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 70
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 51
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 47
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 44
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 39
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 38
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 32
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 29
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 27
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 25
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 21
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 19
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 7
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 11 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
14.8%
Operating Margin
10.6%
Net Margin
4.7%
EBITDA Margin
18.0%
ROE
3.4%
ROA
2.0%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.45
Cash
$464.00M
Total Debt
$5.57B
Current Ratio
1.29
Debt/Equity
0.59
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 4.9.2026 | $0.210 |
| 5.6.2026 | $0.210 |
| 4.6.2026 | $0.210 |
| 10.3.2026 | $0.210 |
| 9.3.2026 | $0.210 |
| 28.11.2025 | $0.210 |
| 27.11.2025 | $0.210 |
| 29.8.2025 | $0.210 |
| 28.8.2025 | $0.210 |
| 30.5.2025 | $0.210 |
| 29.5.2025 | $0.210 |
| 7.3.2025 | $0.210 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$21.22
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$2.27
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-89.3%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-5.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -5.0% | $485.45M | $445.37M |
| 2 | -3.1% | $470.28M | $395.83M |
| 3 | -1.2% | $464.40M | $358.60M |
| 4 | 0.6% | $467.30M | $331.05M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $478.99M | $311.31M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$511.00M
Terminal Value
$7.55B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$4.91B
Enterprise Value
$6.75B
Net Debt
$5.11B
Equity Value
$1.64B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$13.03
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$13.03
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 9 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
POWER Magazine · 10.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 7.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 5.9.2026
Benzinga · 3.9.2026
MT Newswires · 3.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 30.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 23.8.2026
Benzinga · 16.8.2026
PR Newswire · 14.8.2026
Yahoo · 14.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 13.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 8.8.2026
Weyerhaeuser (WY) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 35/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
WY currently scores 35/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, WY's estimated fair value is $2.27, which is 89.3% below the current price of $21.22. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
WY's technical score is 14/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: SMA 50 recently crossed above SMA 200.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $2.27 vs. price $21.22 (-89.3%); Operating margin is eroding over time; Calmar: -0.31 (3y annualized return -12.8% / max drawdown 40.9%).
Yes — WY has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chaney Brian K | Tax Withholding in Shares | 3.6.2026 | 3,491 | -3,491 | $24.39 |
| Chaney Brian K | Tax Withholding in Shares | 3.6.2026 | 115,460 | -3,491 | $24.39 |
| Wold David M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 16.5.2026 | 1,062 | -1,062 | $22.68 |
| Wold David M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 16.5.2026 | 164,830 | -1,062 | $22.68 |
| HOLLEY RICK R | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 11,531 | +11,531 | — |
| Williams Kim | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 7,832 | +7,832 | — |
| SELZER LAWRENCE A | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 7,832 | +7,832 | — |
| Monaco Albert | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 3,781 | +3,781 | $22.98 |
| PIASECKI NICOLE WEYERHAEUSER | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 7,832 | +7,832 | — |
| O'Rourke James Calvin | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 4,926 | +4,926 | $22.98 |
| BECKWITT RICHARD | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 7,832 | +7,832 | — |
| O'Rourke James Calvin | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 7,832 | +7,832 | — |
| Monaco Albert | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 7,832 | +7,832 | — |
| Merriwether Deidra C | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 7,832 | +7,832 | — |
| Emmert Mark A | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 7,832 | +7,832 | — |
| Williams Kim | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 5,221.932 | +5,221.932 | $22.98 |
| Lewis Sara Grootwassink | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 7,832 | +7,832 | — |
| PIASECKI NICOLE WEYERHAEUSER | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 20,672 | +7,832 | — |
| Lewis Sara Grootwassink | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 80,214 | +7,832 | — |
| BECKWITT RICHARD | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 31,874 | +7,832 | — |
| HOLLEY RICK R | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 96,161 | +11,531 | — |
| Williams Kim | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 61,545 | +7,832 | — |
| Williams Kim | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 92,291 | +5,222 | $22.98 |
| Monaco Albert | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 81,358 | +7,832 | — |
| Monaco Albert | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.5.2026 | 85,139 | +3,781 | $22.98 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
27,828,129 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 25,055,646 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
34.5% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 43.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology