Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· ·
$3.25
▼ $0.84 (-20.5%)
Market data updated: 10/01 12:53 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/30/2026
News analyzed: 09/30/2026
Market Cap
$6.28M
Day Range
$2.97 - $3.46
52-Week Range
⚠️ Data anomaly
Beta
—
Next Earnings
04.11.2026
Support
$0.32
Resistance
$63.00
-99.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 9/25 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 100.0%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 95.2% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
56
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
65
Quality
58
Value
50
Momentum
36
Risk
34
Sentiment
98
Fundamental
61
Institutional
75
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage on Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. is limited, as the provided sources do not mention the company explicitly. The headlines focus solely on general stock market activity, highlighting notable price movements, gaps, and top gainers/losers across various sessions without referencing Wheeler REIT or its performance. No specific details about the company’s recent events or trends are available.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.. News trend score: 98. Reason: 9 of the last 17 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
38
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
41
Psychology
100
Fundamentals
61
Technical
36
Valuation
50
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-98%
Market Narrative
74
Fundamental Reality
41
Narrative Gap
+33
👥 What the crowd believes
"Wheeler REIT led gainers"
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Benjamin Graham — 89/100
🔴 Weakest match
Gerald M. Loeb — 21/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between value-oriented and cyclical investors, with Graham and Veblen both scoring near-perfect alignment at 89, suggesting it meets deep-value and growth-with-real-earnings criteria. Marks’ cycle-focused approaches (80 and 78) also see it as favorably positioned, while Lynch and Mackay’s slightly lower scores (66 and 65) hint at concerns over overvaluation or speculative momentum. On the other end, Fisher, Smith, and Loeb’s low scores (40, 30, and 21) reflect skepticism about quality, stability, or risk tolerance, while the efficient-market camp (48) dismisses it as unexceptional. The contrast highlights how value, cyclical, and trend-following methodologies celebrate fundamentals or timing, while quality and risk-averse frameworks dismiss it outright.
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 89
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 89
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 80
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 78
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 76
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 66
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 65
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 61
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 56
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 48
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 45
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 40
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 34
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 30
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 21
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 288 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 7 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
43.5%
Net Margin
8.8%
EBITDA Margin
66.5%
ROE
3747.9%
ROA
1.5%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$36.01
Cash
$23.66M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
—
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$3.25
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$706.67
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
⚠️ Extreme
Model output is extreme — likely a data/model limitation for this stock, not a reliable fair-value read.
Year 1 Growth Rate
10.3%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.3% | $4.44M | $4.07M |
| 2 | 8.3% | $4.81M | $4.05M |
| 3 | 6.4% | $5.12M | $3.95M |
| 4 | 4.4% | $5.34M | $3.79M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $5.48M | $3.56M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$4.03M
Terminal Value
$86.36M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$56.13M
Enterprise Value
$75.54M
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$75.54M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$2.19
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$117.34
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 7 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 17 articles.
ChartMill · 28.9.2026
ChartMill · 28.9.2026
ChartMill · 25.9.2026
ChartMill · 25.9.2026
ChartMill · 25.9.2026
ChartMill · 24.9.2026
ChartMill · 24.9.2026
ChartMill · 24.9.2026
ChartMill · 23.9.2026
Benzinga · 23.9.2026
Benzinga · 23.9.2026
ChartMill · 21.9.2026
ChartMill · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
ChartMill · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 6.8.2026
Wheeler Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (WHLR) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 56/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
WHLR currently scores 56/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
WHLR's technical score is 36/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 100.0%; Net income growth: 191.1%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 95.2% of price; Calmar: -1.00 (3y annualized return -100.0% / max drawdown 100.0%); Revenue growth (last year): -4.9%.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for WHLR.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 6 purchases and 2 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stilwell Joseph | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.9.2026 | 442,563 | +257,902 | — |
| Stilwell Joseph | Disposition to the Company | 23.9.2026 | 65,596 | -3,517 | — |
| Stilwell Joseph | Disposition to the Company | 23.9.2026 | 18,587 | -955 | — |
| Stilwell Joseph | Disposition to the Company | 23.9.2026 | 134,678 | -3,287 | — |
| Stilwell Joseph | Disposition to the Company | 23.9.2026 | 496,185 | -26,603 | — |
| Stilwell Joseph | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.9.2026 | 184,661 | +184,655 | — |
| Stilwell Joseph | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.9.2026 | 62,829 | +62,829 | — |
| Stilwell Joseph | Disposition to the Company | 23.9.2026 | 522,788 | -24,730 | — |
| Stilwell Joseph | Disposition to the Company | 23.9.2026 | 128,103 | -6,575 | — |
| Stilwell Joseph | Disposition to the Company | 23.9.2026 | 0 | -3,222 | — |
| Stilwell Joseph | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.9.2026 | 25,516 | +25,516 | — |
| Stilwell Joseph | Grant/Award from Employer | 23.9.2026 | 61,284 | +35,768 | — |
| Stilwell Joseph | Disposition to the Company | 23.9.2026 | 69,113 | -3,270 | — |
| Stilwell Joseph | Disposition to the Company | 23.9.2026 | 19,542 | -491 | — |
| HRT FINANCIAL LP | Open Market Sale | 10.9.2026 | 1,315 | -5,048 | $0.37 |
| HRT FINANCIAL LP | Open Market Purchase | 9.9.2026 | 3,733 | +11,253 | $0.38 |
| HRT FINANCIAL LP | Open Market Purchase | 8.9.2026 | 7,520 | +8,197 | $0.39 |
| HRT FINANCIAL LP | Open Market Sale | 8.7.2026 | 95,390 | -66,584 | $0.49 |
| HRT FINANCIAL LP | Open Market Purchase | 7.7.2026 | 161,974 | +40,591 | $0.61 |
| HRT FINANCIAL LP | Open Market Purchase | 6.7.2026 | 121,383 | +21,703 | $0.08 |
| HRT FINANCIAL LP | Open Market Purchase | 2.7.2026 | 99,680 | +17,348 | $1.39 |
| HRT FINANCIAL LP | Open Market Purchase | 1.7.2026 | 82,333 | +14,698 | $1.14 |
| Stilwell Joseph | Other Transaction | 30.6.2026 | 137,965 | +29,011 | — |
| Stilwell Joseph | Other Transaction | 30.6.2026 | 20,033 | +4,235 | — |
| Stilwell Joseph | Other Transaction | 30.6.2026 | 22,251 | +3,152 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
258,807 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 566,046 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
51.7% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 50.7% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology