Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· · NYSE
$161.44
▼ $0.29 (-0.2%)
Market data updated: 09/15 10:32 PM
News analyzed: 09/15/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$160.97 - $161.73
52-Week Range
$137.42 - $167.61
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
+14.4% (1Y)
⚠️ Insufficient data for a reliable StockIQ Score
Only 3 of 7 categories available — Fundamental, Growth, Valuation, Quality unavailable.
Strengths: 3/13 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 0.7% of price
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is below the 50-day average
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 1 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 1
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
VYM’s overall investor score of 62 reflects a mixed but cautiously optimistic technical and risk profile, tempered by a strong news sentiment. The technical indicators show a divided picture: while the stock maintains positive momentum with an RSI of 50.6 and sits above both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages—suggesting short-term stability—it is undermined by a negative MACD histogram and a price below the SAR point, signaling potential downtrend pressure. The risk category is moderately favorable, with a low ATR (0.7% of price) indicating limited volatility, but the Calmar ratio (1.02) suggests a balanced risk-reward tradeoff given its 3-year annualized return (15.4%) and drawdown (15.0%). However, the news category stands out as the strongest, with an 86 score driven by positive and neutral coverage around dividend-focused ETFs and retirement strategies, reinforcing VYM’s appeal as a stable income generator despite some technical caution.
The stock shows mixed signals: it remains above key moving averages (50-day and 200-day) and has healthy momentum (RSI 50.6), but the MACD histogram is negative, and the price is below the SAR point, indicating potential downtrend risks.
This duality suggests short-term stability but also highlights the need to monitor for potential reversals or weakening trends.
The news sentiment is overwhelmingly positive (86 score), with articles emphasizing VYM’s role in dividend income strategies and retirement planning, though some comparisons to peers (e.g., VIG) introduce minor caution.
Strong news coverage reinforces investor confidence in VYM’s utility as a dividend-focused asset, particularly for passive income seekers.
The ATR (0.7% of price) indicates low volatility, while the Calmar ratio (1.02) reflects a balanced risk profile with a 15.4% annualized return over 3 years and a 15.0% max drawdown.
This balance suggests VYM is a relatively stable but not risk-free investment, with manageable drawdowns relative to returns.
StockIQ conclusion
VYM presents a nuanced profile with a moderate overall score of 62, driven by strong news sentiment and stable technical indicators offset by mixed momentum signals and downtrend warnings. While its low volatility and positive RSI suggest short-term resilience, the negative MACD and SAR positioning introduce caution. Investors may view VYM as a stable dividend play with cautious optimism, though ongoing monitoring of technical trends and external factors will be essential.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
46
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
33
Risk
58
Sentiment
74
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of the **Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM)** has centered on its role in dividend-focused investing strategies, particularly for passive income generation. Analysts highlight its adaptability to economic conditions and note a rating upgrade, emphasizing its appeal for retirees seeking steady yields. However, discussions also caution about the challenges of achieving high dividend income targets—such as rising capital requirements and expense ratio considerations—while comparing VYM to other dividend ETFs. The focus remains on its utility in income-driven portfolios.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF. News trend score: 74. Reason: 6 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
10
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
70
Fundamentals
—
Technical
33
Valuation
—
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+1%
Market Narrative
51
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+1
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for VYM suggests traders are fixated on the 2.1% resistance gap, consistent with anchoring bias. While euphoria and FOMO signals exist, weak momentum and neutral RSI temper extreme optimism. The narrative-reality gap (13) hints at potential misalignment between perceived strength and actual performance. The key question: will traders break the resistance anchor, or will they hold near it despite weak momentum?
Updated: 09/07/2026, 10:37 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"the yield number printed on the fund page is usually the first thing that breaks them"
"owning two or three dividend ETFs... can quietly leave retirees paying multiple expense ratios"
"VIG Pays Less Than Half of SCHD by Design: What $500,000 Gives Up Every Year in Dividends"
"Building a dividend portfolio to match a six-figure salary"
📈 7D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Morgan Housel — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 39/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock splits the historical methodologies into sharp contrasts: patient, long-term thinkers like **Morgan Housel** and **Gerald Loeb** see strong potential, while more cautious or cyclical investors like **Jesse Livermore** and **Howard Marks (Market Cycle)** flag red flags. Housel’s near-perfect score reflects his focus on steady, compounding dividends, while Loeb’s moderate approval aligns with his conservative capital-preservation approach. Meanwhile, **Samuel Nelson**’s favorable cycle reading suggests a tactical buy signal, though **Charles Mackay**’s lower score hints at growing speculative interest—contrasting with the outright rejection from **Jack Schwager**’s disciplined, rule-based system. The middle ground—where **Howard Marks** and **Efficient Market** proponents waver—highlights the tension between valuing the business and questioning whether the stock’s current price already reflects its merits.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 100
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 94
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 79
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 74
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 58
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 53
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 53
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 50
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 39
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 275 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 8 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a trading range, but the picture isn't yet clear enough on the likely direction.
Low confidence
$159.28
Range Bottom
$167.61
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 18.6.2026 | $0.980 |
| 20.3.2026 | $0.862 |
| 19.12.2025 | $0.947 |
| 19.9.2025 | $0.842 |
| 20.6.2025 | $0.862 |
| 21.3.2025 | $0.850 |
| 20.12.2024 | $0.964 |
| 20.9.2024 | $0.851 |
| 21.6.2024 | $1.024 |
| 15.3.2024 | $0.656 |
| 18.12.2023 | $1.100 |
| 18.9.2023 | $0.785 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 6 positive, 12 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 13.9.2026
Yahoo · 13.9.2026
Yahoo · 12.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 12.9.2026
Yahoo · 12.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
etf.com · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for VYM specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
VYM's technical score is 33/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 0.7% of price; Price is above the 200-day average; +0.6% over the last 3 months relative to the index.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is below the 50-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; Price is below the SAR point — downtrend.
Yes — VYM has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 0 filings.
No recent insider transaction filings found for this stock.
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
456,119 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 539,497 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
49.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 45.2% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology