Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$31.70
▼ $0.47 (-1.5%)
Market data updated: 09/30 10:09 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/30/2026
News analyzed: 09/30/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$31.45 - $32.54
52-Week Range
$27.17 - $59.00
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
Support
$31.45
Resistance
$42.36
VSNT is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
-30.6% (1Y)
Strengths: 5/24 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Leverage risk
Debt/equity: 0.10
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is eroding over time
Quality
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 0 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 0
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
40
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
32
Quality
47
Value
50
Momentum
11
Risk
62
Sentiment
44
Fundamental
62
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Versant Media Group (VSNT) highlights mixed financial performance amid strategic shifts. The company reported a 3.8% revenue decline and a 30.1% drop in net income for Q2 2026, yet raised its full-year outlook and maintained dividends. Versant’s sports division, USA Sports, secured a broadcast deal with World Team Tennis, while executives are set to present at major industry conferences. Technical analysts note a bullish stock trend.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Versant Media Group, Inc.. News trend score: 44. Reason: 6 of the last 20 articles are negative, versus 5 positive.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
34
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
37
Psychology
84
Fundamentals
62
Technical
11
Valuation
50
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-16%
Market Narrative
30
Fundamental Reality
37
Narrative Gap
-7
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant herding behavior suggests investors are aligning with peers despite VSNT’s relative underperformance today. Confirmation bias persists due to a disconnect between positive narrative (59) and weak fundamentals (37), reinforcing selective attention to favorable signals. The absence of panic or euphoria signals indicates a cautious, peer-driven herd mentality. The key question remains whether this herding reflects a temporary peer-driven pullback or a deeper narrative-driven misalignment with fundamentals.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 01:57 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Revenue slipped 3.8% year over year... yet the same report included a raised full-year outlook"
"World Team Tennis (WTT) announced a broadcast partnership with Versant's USA Sports"
"TD Cowen raises price target from $35 to $39"
"Versant Media (VSNT) shows a healthy uptrend with 7/10 technical rating"
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Benjamin Graham — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Philip Fisher — 16/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on the documented principles of Benjamin Graham (defensive) and Walter Bagehot, the model estimates a very favorable view of VSNT, reflected in perfect scores and verdicts highlighting its attractiveness and strong liquidity. In contrast, growth‑oriented or trend‑following investors such as Peter Lynch, Thorstein Veblen, Philip Fisher, and Jesse Livermore receive low scores, indicating the stock fails to meet their growth‑at‑a‑reasonable‑price, quality, or positive‑trend criteria. Mid‑range scores from Samuel Armstrong Nelson, Charles Mackay, Gerald Loeb, and Howard Marks suggest the stock sits in a favorable cycle position and offers reasonable capital preservation, yet may be priced near expectations. Finally, the mixed or neutral assessments from Howard Marks (market cycle), Jack Schwager, the efficient‑market view, and Morgan Housel reflect uncertainty about edge, index‑relative performance, and volatility, leading to more cautious conclusions.
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 100
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 100
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 100
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 20%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 98
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 86
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 79
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 66
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 63
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 44
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 37
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 36
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 40%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 36
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 34
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 21
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 16
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 199 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 10 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
19.0%
Net Margin
13.9%
EBITDA Margin
19.0%
ROE
9.0%
ROA
7.5%
ROIC
—
EPS
—
Cash
$55.00M
Total Debt
$983.00M
Current Ratio
4.02
Debt/Equity
0.10
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 1.7.2026 | $0.375 |
| 30.6.2026 | $0.375 |
| 1.4.2026 | $0.375 |
| 31.3.2026 | $0.375 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
—
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
—
Not enough data to compute signals.
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 5 positive, 9 neutral, 6 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Benzinga · 28.9.2026
Yahoo · 25.9.2026
Benzinga · 25.9.2026
Benzinga · 24.9.2026
Benzinga · 24.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 24.9.2026
Benzinga · 23.9.2026
Yahoo · 23.9.2026
Yahoo · 23.9.2026
Benzinga · 21.9.2026
Benzinga · 21.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
PR Newswire · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 31.8.2026
Yahoo · 31.8.2026
Business Wire · 31.8.2026
Business Wire · 31.8.2026
Versant Media Group, Inc. (VSNT) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 40/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
VSNT currently scores 40/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
VSNT's technical score is 11/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Debt/equity: 0.10; Current ratio: 4.02; Debt/equity: 0.10.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is eroding over time; Revenue growth (last year): -5.3%; Free cash flow growth: -14.0%.
Yes — VSNT has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 10 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lazarus Mark H | Tax Withholding in Shares | 28.7.2026 | 6,200 | -6,200 | $37.24 |
| Lazarus Mark H | Tax Withholding in Shares | 28.7.2026 | 627,018 | -6,200 | $37.24 |
| Campbell Rebecca | Grant/Award from Employer | 26.6.2026 | 5,119 | +5,119 | $36.14 |
| Potter Leonard | Grant/Award from Employer | 26.6.2026 | 5,119 | +5,119 | $36.14 |
| Condon Creighton | Grant/Award from Employer | 26.6.2026 | 5,119 | +5,119 | $36.14 |
| Conway Michael Aaron | Grant/Award from Employer | 26.6.2026 | 5,119 | +5,119 | $36.14 |
| NOVAK DAVID C | Grant/Award from Employer | 26.6.2026 | 5,119 | +5,119 | $36.14 |
| Montiel Maritza Gomez | Grant/Award from Employer | 26.6.2026 | 5,119 | +5,119 | $36.14 |
| HASSELL GERALD L | Grant/Award from Employer | 26.6.2026 | 5,119 | +5,119 | $36.14 |
| Eun David | Grant/Award from Employer | 26.6.2026 | 5,119 | +5,119 | $36.14 |
| Mahoney William Scott | Grant/Award from Employer | 26.6.2026 | 5,119 | +5,119 | $36.14 |
| Fasbender Jordan | Tax Withholding in Shares | 2.5.2026 | 3,720 | -3,720 | $40.83 |
| Fasbender Jordan | Tax Withholding in Shares | 2.5.2026 | 80,408 | -3,720 | $40.83 |
| Wright Gregory Michael | Tax Withholding in Shares | 3.4.2026 | 495 | -495 | $37.43 |
| Wright Gregory Michael | Tax Withholding in Shares | 3.4.2026 | 27,458 | -495 | $37.43 |
| Potter Leonard | Open Market Purchase | 13.3.2026 | 2,500 | +2,500 | $37.65 |
| Potter Leonard | Open Market Purchase | 13.3.2026 | 15,878 | +2,500 | $37.65 |
| Potter Leonard | Open Market Purchase | 12.3.2026 | 5,000 | +5,000 | $37.88 |
| Potter Leonard | Open Market Purchase | 12.3.2026 | 13,378 | +5,000 | $37.88 |
| Potter Leonard | Open Market Purchase | 11.3.2026 | 3,000 | +3,000 | $38.34 |
| Potter Leonard | Open Market Purchase | 11.3.2026 | 8,378 | +3,000 | $38.34 |
| Potter Leonard | Open Market Purchase | 10.3.2026 | 3,000 | +3,000 | $37.31 |
| Potter Leonard | Open Market Purchase | 10.3.2026 | 5,378 | +3,000 | $37.31 |
| Conway Michael Aaron | Open Market Purchase | 9.3.2026 | 1,350 | +1,350 | $36.14 |
| HASSELL GERALD L | Open Market Purchase | 9.3.2026 | 10,000 | +10,000 | $36.07 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
5,485,302 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 5,904,336 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
42.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 47.7% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology