Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Energy · ·
$72.27
▼ $1.04 (-1.4%)
Market data updated: 09/19 02:39 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$6.89B
Day Range
$71.62 - $73.64
52-Week Range
$33.37 - $81.44
Beta
—
Next Earnings
20.10.2026
Support
$61.50
Resistance
$79.77
VIST is a stock from the Energy sector — Oil, gas, and renewable energy — highly volatile profitability, dependent on global commodity prices.
+108.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 11/28 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Net income growth
Net income growth: 20.3%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$23.56 vs. price $72.27 (-132.6%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
58
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
57
Quality
50
Value
43
Momentum
48
Risk
34
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
70
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Vista Energy S.A.B. de C.V. has centered on its stock performance and analyst sentiment, with a focus on adjusted fair value estimates and price targets. Analysts revised Vista’s fair value downward from MX$1,645.45 to MX$1,566.46, while JP Morgan raised its price target to US$94, maintaining an "Overweight" rating. The company’s strong earnings and revenue growth were highlighted, alongside technical breakout potential, though debt concerns and market timing cautions were noted. Additionally, Peter Thiel’s 1% stake acquisition drew attention, linking Vista to broader energy and AI-related investment themes.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Vista Energy S.A.B. de C.V. American Depositary Shares each representing one series A share with no par value. News trend score: 100. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
23
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
52
Fundamentals
70
Technical
48
Valuation
43
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+5%
Market Narrative
60
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+10
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant herding behavior reflects VIST’s recent price action aligning with peers, while FOMO and euphoria suggest traders are chasing momentum despite moderate overbought conditions. Overconfidence hints at a disconnect between price gains and fundamentals, raising a key question: *Will traders sustain herding or pivot if momentum stalls?* The narrative gap (73 vs. 50) further implies optimism may outpace tangible reality, a classic precursor to caution.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 09:33 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"fair value estimate shifting from MX$1,645.45 to MX$1,566.46"
"Peter Thiel bought a 1% stake in Vista Energy"
"explosive earnings, revenue growth, and top-tier price strength"
"debt and entry timing warrant caution"
📈 7D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 77/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with some models seeing potential while others flag it as a high-risk or overvalued bet. Thorstein Veblen and Jesse Livermore’s moderate scores suggest a cautious optimism—Veblen’s model detects growth aligned with real value, while Livermore’s neutral stance hints at a lack of clear momentum. Meanwhile, Peter Lynch and the Efficient Market proponents (Malkiel/Bogle) see it as a mixed bag, with Lynch noting that the stock’s price already reflects much of its growth, while the efficient-market camp questions whether active selection adds value. On the other end, the majority of methodologies—from Benjamin Graham’s defensive criteria to Morgan Housel’s volatility concerns—paint a far more pessimistic picture, with scores as low as 1, signaling overvaluation, risk, or poor structural fit. The contrast underscores a fundamental tension: whether the stock’s growth justifies its valuation or if it’s a speculative play with little margin for error.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 77
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 67
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 60
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 57
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 50
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 44
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 43
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 34
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 34
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 30
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 23
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 15
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 14
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 12
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 8
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 5 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
47.5%
Operating Margin
50.5%
Net Margin
29.1%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
28.6%
ROA
10.1%
ROIC
—
EPS
$4.98
Cash
$764.31M
Total Debt
$1.45B
Current Ratio
0.86
Debt/Equity
1.31
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$72.27
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$23.56
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-132.6%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
10.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.0% | $-102.85M | $-94.36M |
| 2 | 8.1% | $-111.21M | $-93.60M |
| 3 | 6.3% | $-118.16M | $-91.24M |
| 4 | 4.4% | $-123.33M | $-87.37M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-126.41M | $-82.16M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-93.50M
Terminal Value
$-1.99B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-1.30B
Enterprise Value
$-1.74B
Net Debt
$684.26M
Equity Value
$-2.43B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$24.08
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$23.90
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 8 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 8.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 5.9.2026
Yahoo · 5.9.2026
ChartMill · 2.9.2026
Benzinga · 1.9.2026
ChartMill · 27.8.2026
Yahoo · 24.8.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 24.8.2026
Bloomberg · 20.8.2026
Benzinga · 20.8.2026
Barchart · 19.8.2026
ChartMill · 18.8.2026
Barchart · 17.8.2026
Vista Energy S.A.B. de C.V. American Depositary Shares each representing one series A share with no par value (VIST) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 58/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
VIST currently scores 58/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, VIST's estimated fair value is -$23.56, which is 132.6% below the current price of $72.27. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
VIST's technical score is 48/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Net income growth: 20.3%; Return on equity (ROE): 28.6% — strong; Price is above the 50-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$23.56 vs. price $72.27 (-132.6%); ATR: 4.3% of price; Current ratio: 0.86.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for VIST.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VERA PINTO PABLO MANUEL | Disposition to the Company | 13.7.2026 | 61,861 | -61,861 | $66.30 |
| GAROBY JUAN MARIA | Disposition to the Company | 13.7.2026 | 61,861 | -61,861 | $66.30 |
| Galuccio Miguel Matias | Disposition to the Company | 13.7.2026 | 281,186 | -281,186 | $66.30 |
| CHERNACOV ALEJANDRO | Disposition to the Company | 13.7.2026 | 56,238 | -56,238 | $66.30 |
| Galuccio Miguel Matias | Disposition to the Company | 13.7.2026 | 0 | -281,186 | $66.30 |
| CHERNACOV ALEJANDRO | Disposition to the Company | 13.7.2026 | 0 | -56,238 | $66.30 |
| VERA PINTO PABLO MANUEL | Disposition to the Company | 13.7.2026 | 0 | -61,861 | $66.30 |
| GAROBY JUAN MARIA | Disposition to the Company | 13.7.2026 | 0 | -61,861 | $66.30 |
| Losada German Nicanor | Other Transaction | 11.6.2026 | 3,900 | -3,900 | — |
| Losada German Nicanor | Other Transaction | 11.6.2026 | 3,900 | +3,900 | — |
| Losada German Nicanor | Other Transaction | 11.6.2026 | 255,304 | -3,900 | — |
| Losada German Nicanor | Other Transaction | 11.6.2026 | 3,900 | +3,900 | — |
| Losada German Nicanor | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.4.2026 | 6,000 | +6,000 | — |
| Martellozo Gerard | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.4.2026 | 6,000 | -6,000 | — |
| Doehner Cobian Mauricio | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.4.2026 | 6,000 | +6,000 | — |
| SEGAL SUSAN | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.4.2026 | 6,000 | +6,000 | — |
| Doehner Cobian Mauricio | Tax Withholding in Shares | 9.4.2026 | 2,100 | -2,100 | $65.08 |
| Sivignon Pierre Jean | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.4.2026 | 6,000 | +6,000 | — |
| Sivignon Pierre Jean | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.4.2026 | 6,000 | -6,000 | — |
| Losada German Nicanor | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.4.2026 | 6,000 | -6,000 | — |
| Martellozo Gerard | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.4.2026 | 6,000 | +6,000 | — |
| Losada German Nicanor | Tax Withholding in Shares | 9.4.2026 | 2,100 | -2,100 | $65.08 |
| SEGAL SUSAN | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.4.2026 | 6,000 | -6,000 | — |
| Doehner Cobian Mauricio | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.4.2026 | 6,000 | -6,000 | — |
| Martellozo Gerard | Tax Withholding in Shares | 9.4.2026 | 1,500 | -1,500 | $65.08 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
2,505,849 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 2,592,116 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
51.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 51.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology