Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Basic Materials · ·
$14.66
▼ $0.46 (-3.0%)
Market data updated: 10/08 05:17 AM
Fundamentals updated: 10/07/2026
News analyzed: 10/08/2026
Market Cap
$415.19M
Day Range
$14.66 - $14.96
52-Week Range
$11.44 - $19.19
Beta
—
Next Earnings
05.11.2026
Support
$13.06
Resistance
$19.19
VHI is a stock from the Materials sector — Mining, chemicals, and metals — the raw materials that feed other industries, sensitive to commodity prices.
THE BOTTOM LINE · IN ONE SECOND
Mixed
1 of 8 sources for, 2 against
If right
+4.2%
to the target
If wrong
-3.8%
to the stop
Possible gain is 1.1x the possible loss
🏛️ Legendary investors
7 of 16 would buy
🧠 Crowd mood: Herding
🏭 Industry weight
All the data behind it — below ↓
Not enough similar moments in this stock's history for reliable percentages — so no odds are shown.
🎯 Near target
$15.27+4.2%
🛡️ Support
$14.40-1.8%
🛑 Stop
$14.10-3.8%
💎 Fair value (DCF)
—
⚖️ The jury
8 independent data sources from the site — each one votes
🏛️ Legendary investors who would buy:Benjamin Graham · Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) · Charles Mackay · Samuel Armstrong Nelson · Howard Marks (Market Cycle) · Howard Marks
🚫 who would pass:Gerald M. Loeb · Jesse Livermore · Burton Malkiel & John Bogle · Thorstein Veblen · Peter Lynch · Philip Fisher
For
Against
The percentages are real frequencies: how many similar past moments were up or down a month later. Every jury vote is computed from the site's own data, no AI. Not a promise and not investment advice.
-1.3% (1Y)
Computed automatically from real price data (swing highs/lows, volume flow) as of 2026-10-07. The lines are also drawn on the chart above. Not investment advice.
Strengths: 5/29 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Liquidity risk
Current ratio: 2.80
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Net margin
Net margin: -2.8% (negative)
Fundamental
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 0 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 0
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
36
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
Not enough data yet to generate this synthesis.
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
26
Quality
42
Value
55
Momentum
29
Risk
40
Sentiment
50
Fundamental
27
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Benjamin Graham — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 100
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 100
Deep statistical discount — a real Enterprising Investor candidate
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 95
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 95
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 69
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 65
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 63
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 55
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 45
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 39
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 36
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 24
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 21
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 8
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 7
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 254 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 9 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
14.2%
Operating Margin
3.0%
Net Margin
-2.8%
EBITDA Margin
6.2%
ROE
-5.6%
ROA
-2.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$2.02
Cash
$214.00M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
2.80
Debt/Equity
—
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 3.9.2026 | $0.080 |
| 4.6.2026 | $0.080 |
| 16.3.2026 | $0.080 |
| 21.11.2025 | $0.080 |
| 5.9.2025 | $0.080 |
| 9.6.2025 | $0.080 |
| 17.3.2025 | $0.080 |
| 29.11.2024 | $0.080 |
| 6.9.2024 | $0.080 |
| 10.6.2024 | $0.080 |
| 8.3.2024 | $0.080 |
| 30.11.2023 | $0.080 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$14.66
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$41,115,008.95
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
⚠️ Extreme
Model output is extreme — likely a data/model limitation for this stock, not a reliable fair-value read.
Year 1 Growth Rate
-1.8%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -1.8% | $-80.64M | $-73.98M |
| 2 | -0.7% | $-80.07M | $-67.40M |
| 3 | 0.4% | $-80.36M | $-62.05M |
| 4 | 1.4% | $-81.51M | $-57.75M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-83.55M | $-54.30M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-82.10M
Terminal Value
$-1.32B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-856.30M
Enterprise Value
$-1.17B
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$-1.17B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$35,901,754.39
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$22,487,719.30
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 0 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 0 articles.
No recent articles found for this stock.
Valhi, Inc. (VHI) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 36/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
VHI currently scores 36/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
VHI's technical score is 29/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Current ratio: 2.80; Price is above the 200-day average; +6.2% over the last 3 months relative to the index.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Net margin: -2.8% (negative); Operating margin is eroding over time; ATR: 4.6% of price.
Yes — VHI has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
As of 2026-10-07, at a price of $14.86, the nearest support is $14.40, the nearest resistance is $15.27, a stop below support sits at $14.10. The levels come from the stock's real swing highs and lows over the last two years and are recomputed daily. Not investment advice.
Based on real trading volume (Chaikin Money Flow and weekly On-Balance Volume): money flowing out for 4 weeks in a row.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 6 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tidlund Mary A. | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 10,391 | +3,150 | $12.66 |
| Hill Randy L | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 3,150 | +3,150 | $12.66 |
| BARRY THOMAS E | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 14,682 | +3,150 | $12.66 |
| Herrington Terri | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 10,058 | +3,150 | $12.66 |
| Feehan Loretta J. | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 10,641 | +3,150 | $12.66 |
| Norris Gina A. | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 5,450 | +3,150 | $12.66 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
72,931 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 74,304 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
42.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 40.2% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology
VHI exhibits a weak overall investor score of 36, driven primarily by severe fundamental and growth challenges. The company’s financial health is severely compromised, with negative net profit margins (-2.8%) and a deeply unprofitable return on equity (-5.6%), signaling systemic inefficiencies or distress. Growth metrics are catastrophic, with earnings per share and free cash flow plummeting by 153.3% and 726.7% respectively, reflecting a collapse in operational performance. While valuation metrics are skewed by an extreme DCF anomaly (likely due to data limitations), the NAV per share ($22.5M) and negative P/E (-7.4) suggest either extreme speculation or a fundamentally flawed business model. Technical indicators further underscore fragility, with oversold conditions (RSI 32.0) and a declining MACD histogram, though the stock’s position above the 200-day moving average offers a minor contrarian signal. Quality concerns are compounded by eroding operating margins over time, and risk metrics highlight volatility (ATR 5.0%) and extreme downside potential (72% max drawdown over three years).
The stock trades below the 50-day moving average but above the 200-day, with a historically oversold RSI (32.0) and a negative MACD histogram indicating downward momentum. %K at 0.0 suggests extreme oversold conditions.
These signals may indicate short-term oversold conditions, but the broader trend remains weak, requiring caution.
All profitability metrics are negative or weak: gross margin (14.2%), operating margin (3.0%), net margin (-2.8%), and ROE (-5.6%). ROA is also negative (-2.2%), signaling severe financial distress.
Negative profitability and efficiency ratios are red flags for long-term viability and investor returns.
Revenue contracted by 1.3% YoY, while EPS and net income collapsed by 153.3%, and free cash flow plummeted 726.7%, indicating a complete breakdown in growth and cash generation.
Such extreme declines in growth metrics are typically associated with severe operational or strategic failures.
The DCF model yields an extreme negative result (-276M%), likely due to data limitations, but the NAV per share ($22.5M) and negative P/E (-7.4) suggest either extreme valuation disconnect or speculative trading.
Traditional valuation metrics are unreliable here, but the extreme NAV implies either a unique asset structure or speculative trading dynamics.
No recent news data is available to assess external catalysts or company developments.
Lack of news data prevents contextual understanding of recent events or strategic shifts.
Operating margins are eroding over time, indicating declining operational efficiency or competitive pressures.
Shrinking margins reduce profitability and long-term sustainability.
The stock exhibits high volatility (ATR 5.0%), a low trading volume (2.8x), and extreme downside risk (72% max drawdown over three years).
These factors amplify potential losses and make the stock highly speculative.
StockIQ conclusion
VHI presents a highly speculative and risky investment, characterized by severe fundamental weaknesses, extreme growth declines, and speculative valuation dynamics. While technical oversold conditions and NAV figures may attract contrarian investors, the company’s unprofitability, eroding margins, and high volatility underscore significant risks. Without clear catalysts or operational improvements, the stock’s speculative nature and extreme downside potential dominate the outlook.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
22
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
35
Psychology
75
Fundamentals
27
Technical
29
Valuation
55
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+10%
Market Narrative
33
Fundamental Reality
35
Narrative Gap
-2
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.