Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· ·
$40.34
▲ $0.55 (+1.4%)
Market data updated: 09/30 01:15 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/30/2026
News analyzed: 09/30/2026
Market Cap
$378.47M
Day Range
$40.34 - $40.74
52-Week Range
$32.00 - $41.18
Beta
—
Next Earnings
14.12.2026
Support
$32.77
Resistance
$41.18
+3.4% (1Y)
Strengths: 17/32 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Return on equity (ROE)
Return on equity (ROE): 20.1% — strong
Fundamental
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $26.12 vs. price $40.34 (-35.2%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
63
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
42
Quality
47
Value
38
Momentum
73
Risk
54
Sentiment
98
Fundamental
80
Institutional
94
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Value Line, Inc. highlights mixed financial performance and investor concerns. While the company reported higher fiscal 2026 earnings overall and maintained its dividend alongside a $2 million share repurchase program, Q4 saw a decline in earnings per share and sales compared to the prior year. Analysts have downgraded the stock to "Sell" due to revenue declines, subscriber losses, and challenges in assets under management (AUM), though some note a recent 15% stock rally.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Value Line, Inc.. News trend score: 98. Reason: 9 of the last 19 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
33
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
37
Psychology
58
Fundamentals
80
Technical
73
Valuation
38
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-0%
Market Narrative
79
Fundamental Reality
37
Narrative Gap
+42
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
VALU’s psychology suggests traders are selectively reinforcing narratives (Confirmation Bias, 51) while ignoring weak fundamentals—revenue flat, margins declining. The +39 narrative gap and detached euphoria (+32) imply investors prioritize price action over reality, possibly fueled by overconfidence (47) in momentum over fundamentals. The key question: will traders double down on the +48% DCF premium despite stagnant growth, or will reality eventually break through? The moderate FOMO (25) suggests cautious participation, not blind herd behavior.
Updated: 09/07/2026, 01:43 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Value Line renews $2 million share repurchase program, maintains dividend"
"Value Line stock is downgraded to a soft 'Sell' amid revenue declines, subscriber losses, and AUM headwinds"
"Value Line's 2026 earnings improve year-over-year on EAM growth"
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 16/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The highest scores come from Walter Bagehot (100) and Thorstein Veblen (80), whose documented principles on liquidity and real‑value creation lead the model to estimate that the stock would likely survive stress and aligns with genuine growth. Jesse Livermore’s 71 score adds a positive trend view, while Charles Mackay (54) and Samuel Armstrong Nelson (52) see modest crowd excitement or a mid‑cycle stance, resulting in a cautiously optimistic outlook. In contrast, scores from Jack Schwager down to Morgan Housel fall below 50, with verdicts citing unclear edge, moderate risk, late‑cycle caution, lack of cheapness, missing quality signatures, and volatility, so the model estimates these investors would be wary or negative. This spread reflects how liquidity‑focused, value‑creation, and momentum‑based frameworks differ from deep‑value, growth‑quality, and market‑efficiency lenses, producing a range of conclusions about the stock.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 80
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 71
Positive trend — the price action Livermore looked for
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 63
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 59
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 46
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 46
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 42
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 42
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 38
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 36
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 36
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 31
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 27
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 18
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 16
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 288 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (8 bullish · 3 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
82.0%
Operating Margin
12.0%
Net Margin
64.7%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
20.1%
ROA
14.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
$2.30
Cash
$24.18M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
3.92
Debt/Equity
0.00
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 27.7.2026 | $0.350 |
| 26.7.2026 | $0.350 |
| 27.4.2026 | $0.350 |
| 26.4.2026 | $0.350 |
| 26.1.2026 | $0.325 |
| 25.1.2026 | $0.325 |
| 27.10.2025 | $0.325 |
| 26.10.2025 | $0.325 |
| 28.7.2025 | $0.325 |
| 27.7.2025 | $0.325 |
| 28.4.2025 | $0.325 |
| 27.4.2025 | $0.325 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$40.34
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$26.12
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-35.2%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-5.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -5.0% | $17.65M | $16.20M |
| 2 | -3.1% | $17.10M | $14.39M |
| 3 | -1.2% | $16.89M | $13.04M |
| 4 | 0.6% | $16.99M | $12.04M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $17.42M | $11.32M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$18.58M
Terminal Value
$274.68M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$178.52M
Enterprise Value
$245.52M
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$245.52M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$11.49
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$11.49
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 9 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 19 articles.
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 13.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 7.8.2026
Zacks · 7.8.2026
Zacks · 6.8.2026
Zacks · 4.8.2026
Associated Press · 29.7.2026
GlobeNewswire · 29.7.2026
Benzinga · 29.7.2026
MT Newswires · 17.7.2026
GlobeNewswire · 17.7.2026
Zacks · 14.7.2026
Zacks · 13.7.2026
Zacks · 10.7.2026
Barchart · 6.7.2026
etf.com · 24.6.2026
Value Line, Inc. (VALU) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 63/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
VALU currently scores 63/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, VALU's estimated fair value is $26.12, which is 35.2% below the current price of $40.34. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
VALU's technical score is 73/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Return on equity (ROE): 20.1% — strong; Debt/equity: 0.00; Current ratio: 3.92.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $26.12 vs. price $40.34 (-35.2%); Operating margin is eroding over time; Calmar: -0.07 (3y annualized return -3.0% / max drawdown 43.2%).
Yes — VALU has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 17 purchases and 1 sales out of the last 18 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRECHER HOWARD A | Open Market Purchase | 21.5.2026 | 200 | +200 | $33.89 |
| BRECHER HOWARD A | Open Market Purchase | 21.5.2026 | 1,800 | +200 | $33.89 |
| MUENZER GLENN J. | Open Market Sale | 29.8.2022 | 100 | -100 | $95.15 |
| ANASTASIO STEPHEN | Open Market Purchase | 16.5.2022 | 600 | -600 | $73.00 |
| FIORE ALFRED R | Open Market Purchase | 19.8.2020 | 46 | +46 | $25.68 |
| FIORE ALFRED R | Open Market Purchase | 5.8.2020 | 1 | +1 | $24.25 |
| BRECHER HOWARD A | Open Market Purchase | 4.8.2020 | 200 | +200 | $25.26 |
| FIORE ALFRED R | Open Market Purchase | 4.8.2020 | 3 | +3 | $24.50 |
| ANASTASIO STEPHEN | Open Market Purchase | 29.7.2020 | 200 | +200 | $24.51 |
| ANASTASIO STEPHEN | Open Market Purchase | 15.5.2020 | 200 | +200 | $24.58 |
| BRECHER HOWARD A | Open Market Purchase | 4.10.2019 | 200 | +200 | $23.38 |
| ANASTASIO STEPHEN | Open Market Purchase | 12.7.2018 | 300 | +300 | $22.65 |
| FIORE ALFRED R | Open Market Purchase | 28.11.2017 | 50 | +50 | $17.98 |
| MUENZER GLENN J. | Open Market Purchase | 21.7.2017 | 100 | +100 | $19.66 |
| ANASTASIO STEPHEN | Open Market Purchase | 10.5.2016 | 200 | +200 | $16.80 |
| ANASTASIO STEPHEN | Open Market Purchase | 10.5.2016 | 100 | +100 | $16.72 |
| BRECHER HOWARD A | Open Market Purchase | 24.11.2015 | 400 | +400 | $15.39 |
| BRECHER HOWARD A | Open Market Purchase | 30.4.2013 | 300 | +300 | $9.40 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
16,323 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 15,063 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
45.8% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 62.2% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology