Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Utilities · ·
$7.32
▲ $0.19 (+2.7%)
Market data updated: 10/01 01:31 AM
News analyzed: 10/01/2026
Market Cap
$7.82B
Day Range
$7.30 - $7.51
52-Week Range
$3.60 - $7.78
Beta
—
Next Earnings
11.11.2026
Support
$5.84
Resistance
$7.78
UGP is a stock from the Utilities sector — Electricity, water, and residential gas — steady demand and heavy regulation, considered a defensive, dividend-paying sector.
+85.4% (1Y)
⚠️ Insufficient data for a reliable StockIQ Score
Only 3 of 7 categories available — Fundamental, Growth, Valuation, Quality unavailable.
Strengths: 6/12 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.46 (3y annualized return 27.1% / max drawdown 59.6%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 0 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 0
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
64
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
65
Risk
42
Sentiment
74
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Ultrapar Participações S.A. (UGP) has focused on its valuation and growth potential, positioning it as an attractive option for investors. Analysts highlight its above-average financial growth, strong momentum with rising earnings, and favorable metrics like low EV-to-EBITDA ratios. Some upgrades and downgrades reflect mixed views on its future performance, particularly around upcoming earnings and analyst price target revisions. The stock is also noted for its potential as a high-growth dividend pick.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Ultrapar Participacoes S.A. (New) American Depositary Shares (Each representing one Common Share). News trend score: 74. Reason: 7 of the last 11 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
33
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
39
Fundamentals
—
Technical
65
Valuation
—
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+48%
Market Narrative
52
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+2
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 58/100
🔴 Weakest match
Thorstein Veblen — 20/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s split verdicts reveal a stark divide between methodologies that lack sufficient data and those that flag clear red flags. Half the models—including Graham, Fisher, Lynch, and Bagehot—can’t form a concrete opinion due to missing fundamentals, dividends, or balance-sheet details, leaving their conclusions as ‘not enough data.’ Meanwhile, the remaining approaches diverge sharply: Nelson and the efficient-market model lean neutral, seeing no strong buy signal, while Marks, Housel, and Veblen paint a far more cautious picture. Marks’ valuation concerns and Housel’s volatility warnings suggest a stock prone to panic selling, while Veblen’s low score hints at speculative growth chasing. Schwager and Loeb also err on the side of caution, reinforcing the idea that this stock lacks clear structural advantages—leaving only Smith’s theoretical maximum score as an outlier, though his verdict itself is a technical limitation.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 58
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 54
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 52
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 49
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 47
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 43
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 41
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 33
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 28
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 20
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 250 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (6 bullish · 3 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 26.8.2026 | $0.193 |
| 10.3.2025 | $0.078 |
| 19.8.2024 | $0.045 |
| 8.3.2024 | $0.080 |
| 18.8.2023 | $0.052 |
| 24.2.2023 | $0.019 |
| 24.5.2022 | $0.080 |
| 4.3.2022 | $0.033 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 7 positive, 1 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 11 articles.
Yahoo · 29.9.2026
Yahoo · 28.9.2026
Yahoo · 28.9.2026
Yahoo · 28.9.2026
ChartMill · 25.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 17.9.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Ultrapar Participacoes S.A. (New) American Depositary Shares (Each representing one Common Share) (UGP) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for UGP specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
UGP's technical score is 65/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average; RSI 55.8 — healthy positive momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.46 (3y annualized return 27.1% / max drawdown 59.6%); MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; Price is below the SAR point — downtrend.
Yes — UGP has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 5 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Palhares Alexandre Mendes | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.9.2026 | 334,234 | +75,000 | — |
| Pizzinatto Rodrigo de Almeida | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.9.2026 | 2,085,179 | +200,000 | — |
| de Oliveira Manuella Carvalho Campos | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.9.2026 | 174,378 | +50,000 | — |
| Hachem Andre Saleme | Open Market Sale | 22.9.2026 | 25,675 | -39,200 | $7.67 |
| Amaral Decio de Sampaio | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.9.2026 | 291,432 | +140,000 | — |
| Amaral Decio de Sampaio | Disposition to the Company | 16.9.2026 | 961,127 | -140,000 | — |
| Rabelo Pedro Guedes | Open Market Sale | 10.9.2026 | 57,898 | -30,000 | $7.58 |
| Linden Leonardo Remiao | Open Market Sale | 10.9.2026 | 257,135 | -60,000 | $7.57 |
| Amaral Decio de Sampaio | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 151,432 | -8,000 | $6.93 |
| Hachem Andre Saleme | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 64,875 | -585 | $6.51 |
| Linden Leonardo Remiao | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.6.2026 | 1,374,081 | +43,913 | — |
| Amaral Decio de Sampaio | Disposition to the Company | 28.5.2026 | 159,432 | -47,294 | — |
| Zaia Andre Gustavo | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.4.2026 | 28,822 | +8,253 | — |
| de Oliveira Manuella Carvalho Campos | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.4.2026 | 124,378 | +9,082 | — |
| Palhares Alexandre Mendes | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.4.2026 | 259,234 | +25,798 | — |
| de Souza Fernanda Teves | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.4.2026 | 146,484 | +8,760 | — |
| Tomelin Fulvius Alexandre Pereira | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.4.2026 | 61,910 | +23,166 | — |
| Costa Tabajara Bertelli | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.4.2026 | 1,452,513 | +37,908 | — |
| Rabelo Pedro Guedes | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.4.2026 | 158,942 | +9,674 | — |
| Mascarenhas Marina Guimaraes Moreira | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.4.2026 | 286,590 | +10,069 | — |
| Pizzinatto Rodrigo de Almeida | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.4.2026 | 1,885,179 | +68,445 | — |
| Nogueira Julio Cesar | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.4.2026 | 140,247 | +10,267 | — |
| Hachem Andre Saleme | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.4.2026 | 65,460 | +40,275 | — |
| Hachem Andre Saleme | Disposition to the Company | 20.4.2026 | 97,254 | -40,275 | — |
| Zaia Andre Gustavo | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.4.2026 | 9,111 | +9,111 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
4,472,882 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 3,594,374 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
49.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 44.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology