Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Health Care · ·
$295.65
▼ $2.83 (-0.9%)
Market data updated: 09/28 12:53 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/27/2026
News analyzed: 09/28/2026
Market Cap
$2.29B
Day Range
$293.00 - $297.82
52-Week Range
$173.86 - $338.71
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.11.2026
Support
$232.78
Resistance
$338.71
UFPT is a stock from the Healthcare sector — Pharmaceuticals, biotech, medical devices, and health insurance — less sensitive to economic cycles, but exposed to regulation and FDA approvals.
+55.6% (1Y)
Strengths: 19/30 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Golden Cross
SMA 50 recently crossed above SMA 200
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.50 (3y annualized return 24.1% / max drawdown 48.3%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
72
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
Not enough data yet to generate this synthesis.
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of September 26, 2026
Then
71
$295.65
Now
72
$295.65
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
65
Quality
63
Value
50
Momentum
87
Risk
54
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
71
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Everyone's writing about UFP Technologies, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
34
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
38
Fundamentals
71
Technical
87
Valuation
50
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+14%
Market Narrative
71
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+29
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 81/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 16/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s documented principles, the model estimates that UFPT’s cycle position appears favorable, while Walter Bagehot’s liquidity focus yields a strong survival rating, leading the two to view the stock positively. In contrast, Benjamin Graham’s defensive criteria and his Enterprising Investor framework produce low scores, reflecting concerns about valuation and safety margins. Mid‑range thinkers such as Howard Marks, Thorstein Veblen, and Peter Lynch see mixed signals—acknowledging a solid business but noting that expectations or price may already be high. The overall spread from high (Nelson, Bagehot) to low (Graham, Schwager, Livermore) scores illustrates how differing emphasis on cycle timing, liquidity, growth quality, and value safety leads to divergent conclusions about UFPT.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 81
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 71
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 66
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 65
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 60
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 59
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 52
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 46
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 45
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 44
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 42
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 40
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 27
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 24
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 16
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 287 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (9 bullish · 2 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
28.3%
Operating Margin
15.3%
Net Margin
11.3%
EBITDA Margin
18.5%
ROE
16.1%
ROA
10.4%
ROIC
—
EPS
$8.87
Cash
$20.30M
Total Debt
$135.46M
Current Ratio
2.68
Debt/Equity
0.32
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$54.32
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$10.97
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 9 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 26.9.2026
Yahoo · 25.9.2026
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Zacks · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Zacks · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 3.9.2026
Motley Fool · 31.8.2026
MarketBeat · 28.8.2026
MT Newswires · 28.8.2026
StockStory · 24.8.2026
Business Wire · 20.8.2026
Benzinga · 18.8.2026
MT Newswires · 17.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 14.8.2026
StockStory · 12.8.2026
MT Newswires · 11.8.2026
UFP Technologies, Inc. (UFPT) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 72/100, rated "Strong". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
UFPT currently scores 72/100 (Strong) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
UFPT's technical score is 87/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: SMA 50 recently crossed above SMA 200; Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Debt/equity: 0.32.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.50 (3y annualized return 24.1% / max drawdown 48.3%); CMF 20 days: -0.06; %K 83.2 — overbought.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for UFPT.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 18 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KOZIN MARC D | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 24,462 | -3,650 | $303.97 |
| KOZIN MARC D | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 21,112 | -3,350 | $305.07 |
| KOZIN MARC D | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 3,650 | -3,650 | $303.97 |
| KOZIN MARC D | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2026 | 3,350 | -3,350 | $305.07 |
| Hudson Symeria | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 927 | -298 | $319.11 |
| Hudson Symeria | Open Market Sale | 18.8.2026 | 298 | -298 | $319.11 |
| Hudson Symeria | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 1,225 | -1,926 | $324.58 |
| Hudson Symeria | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 1,926 | -1,926 | $324.58 |
| FELDMANN CYNTHIA L | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 4,476 | -1,000 | $324.26 |
| Hudson Symeria | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 13.8.2026 | 2,658 | +703 | $167.98 |
| Hudson Symeria | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 13.8.2026 | 3,151 | +493 | $260.92 |
| Hudson Symeria | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 13.8.2026 | 0 | -703 | — |
| Hudson Symeria | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 13.8.2026 | 703 | -703 | — |
| Hudson Symeria | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 13.8.2026 | 493 | -493 | — |
| FELDMANN CYNTHIA L | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | $324.26 |
| Hudson Symeria | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 13.8.2026 | 493 | +493 | $260.92 |
| Hudson Symeria | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 13.8.2026 | 703 | +703 | $167.98 |
| BAILLY R JEFFREY | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 0 | -374 | $317.27 |
| BAILLY R JEFFREY | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 374 | -6,866 | $316.58 |
| BAILLY R JEFFREY | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 7,240 | -5,771 | $315.53 |
| BAILLY R JEFFREY | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 6,866 | -6,866 | $316.58 |
| BAILLY R JEFFREY | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 374 | -374 | $317.27 |
| BAILLY R JEFFREY | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 5,771 | -5,771 | $315.53 |
| BAILLY R JEFFREY | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 17,482 | -542 | $315.06 |
| BAILLY R JEFFREY | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 13,011 | -4,471 | $318.21 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,053,665 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 1,053,149 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
74.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 73.1% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology