Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· · NYSE
$133.91
▼ $2.30 (-1.7%)
Market data updated: 09/20 01:37 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$1.42B
Day Range
$131.07 - $135.00
52-Week Range
$89.20 - $139.50
Beta
—
Next Earnings
27.10.2026
Support
$113.98
Resistance
$136.82
+46.9% (1Y)
Strengths: 20/25 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 62.0%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Volume trend
Volume is falling despite the price advance — possible weakening
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
as of 09/11/202674
This Week
73
7D Ago
→ +1
Stable
Technical
89
7D Ago: 87
→ +2
Fundamental
70
7D Ago: 70
→ 0
Growth
71
7D Ago: 71
→ 0
Valuation
55
7D Ago: 55
→ 0
News
100
7D Ago: 100
→ 0
Quality
58
7D Ago: 58
→ 0
Risk
56
7D Ago: 56
→ 0
Biggest Improvements
📊 Score History
74
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
16d ago · $131.51
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
16d ago · $131.51
Evidence: 9 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
⚖️ Base Case
74 / 100
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 26, 2026
Then
69
$126.13
Now
74
$133.91
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
71
Quality
58
Value
55
Momentum
89
Risk
56
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
70
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of CVR Partners, LP has centered on its strong financial performance and market positioning in the fertilizer sector. Analysts highlight its **high nitrogen pricing, efficient Q2 execution, and cost-cutting upgrades**, contributing to a notable stock surge—over 400% in recent months. The company’s **dividend stability and monthly payouts** have also drawn attention, with some comparing it to high-yield dividend stocks. Additionally, government support for **U.S. fertilizer production expansion**, including Secretary Brooke Rollins’ announcement of new projects in Louisiana, underscores CVR’s role in boosting domestic supply chains. Overall, the focus remains on its **growth potential amid industry shifts** and investor interest in its fundamentals.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about CVR Partners, LP Common Units Representing Limited Partner Interests. News trend score: 100. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
25
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
41
Psychology
57
Fundamentals
70
Technical
89
Valuation
55
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+20%
Market Narrative
67
Fundamental Reality
41
Narrative Gap
+26
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant anchoring behavior suggests traders are fixated on the near-term resistance level (0.6% away), likely due to its proximity. While FOMO is present—evidenced by momentum, volume, and euphoric sentiment—the lack of extreme RSI (66) and volatility (0.90x ATR) dampens panic or herding. Overconfidence is subtly active, as price momentum (+7.2%) far exceeds EPS growth (+0.6%), hinting at overreliance on recent trends. The key question: will traders break through resistance, or will anchoring persist as a self-fulfilling barrier?
Updated: 09/09/2026, 09:29 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"strong nitrogen pricing, Q2 execution"
"breaking ground on two major projects bringing critical fertilizer production back to American soil"
"DIV Pays Monthly From 50 of America’s Highest Yielders... Dividend Power strategy: 35 high-yield, low-valuation stocks... CVR Partners LP's Dividend Analysis"
"CVR Partners (UAN) Stock May Look Reasonable Despite Its 407% Run... Is CVR Partners (UAN) Undervalued On Its 3.9% Price Jump?... CVR Partners Q3 distribution is projected near $6 despite lower prices"
📈 20D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 89/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 25/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between growth-focused and value-oriented methodologies. Peter Lynch, Thorstein Veblen, and Edgar Lawrence Smith—all growth or long-term value investors—see it as a high-potential candidate, with Lynch and Veblen emphasizing its underpriced growth potential and Smith calling it a 'buy-and-hold for a decade' pick. Meanwhile, Benjamin Graham’s two approaches (Defensive and Enterprising) still find it attractive, though with more caution, while Philip Fisher’s stricter quality bar leaves him lukewarm. On the opposite end, momentum-driven traders like Jesse Livermore and Jack Schwager dismiss it outright, with Livermore spotting no clear trend and Schwager’s systematic wizards avoiding it entirely. Even conservative voices like Walter Bagehot and Morgan Housel temper enthusiasm, flagging liquidity concerns or moderate effort requirements, while cycle-sensitive investors like Howard Marks (Market Cycle) and Samuel Armstrong Nelson warn of overvaluation or stretched conditions. The contrast highlights whether the stock’s fundamentals justify its growth narrative or if it’s already priced for perfection.
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 89
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 87
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 84
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 75
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 40%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 70
Deep statistical discount — a real Enterprising Investor candidate
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 40%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 67
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 64
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 63
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 59
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 51
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 49
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 47
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 42
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 40
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 38
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 25
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (10 bullish · 1 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
27.0%
Operating Margin
21.2%
Net Margin
16.3%
EBITDA Margin
34.7%
ROE
—
ROA
10.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
$9.33
Cash
$69.24M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
2.21
Debt/Equity
—
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 10.8.2026 | $6.080 |
| 11.5.2026 | $4.000 |
| 10.5.2026 | $4.000 |
| 2.3.2026 | $0.370 |
| 1.3.2026 | $0.370 |
| 10.11.2025 | $4.020 |
| 9.11.2025 | $4.020 |
| 11.8.2025 | $3.890 |
| 10.8.2025 | $3.890 |
| 12.5.2025 | $2.260 |
| 11.5.2025 | $2.260 |
| 3.3.2025 | $1.750 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
—
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
—
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 10 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 28.8.2026
Benzinga · 26.8.2026
Benzinga · 17.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 16.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 15.8.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 14.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 10.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 7.8.2026
Benzinga · 3.8.2026
MarketBeat · 1.8.2026
MarketBeat · 31.7.2026
SeekingAlpha · 31.7.2026
GuruFocus.com · 30.7.2026
SeekingAlpha · 30.7.2026
Moby · 30.7.2026
MT Newswires · 30.7.2026
Business Wire · 29.7.2026
CVR Partners, LP Common Units Representing Limited Partner Interests (UAN) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 74/100, rated "Strong". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
UAN currently scores 74/100 (Strong) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
UAN's technical score is 89/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 62.0%; Net income growth: 62.0%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Volume is falling despite the price advance — possible weakening.
Yes — UAN has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 7 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PYTOSH MARK A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.12.2025 | 3,421 | +3,421 | — |
| PYTOSH MARK A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.12.2025 | 2,000 | -2,000 | — |
| PYTOSH MARK A | Disposition to the Company | 10.12.2025 | 3,689 | -3,689 | $94.92 |
| PYTOSH MARK A | Disposition to the Company | 10.12.2025 | 3,421 | -3,421 | $94.92 |
| PYTOSH MARK A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.12.2025 | 3,689 | -3,689 | — |
| PYTOSH MARK A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.12.2025 | 3,689 | +3,689 | — |
| PYTOSH MARK A | Disposition to the Company | 10.12.2025 | 2,000 | -2,000 | $94.92 |
| PYTOSH MARK A | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.12.2025 | 8,482 | +8,482 | — |
| PYTOSH MARK A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.12.2025 | 2,000 | +2,000 | — |
| PYTOSH MARK A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.12.2025 | 3,421 | -3,421 | — |
| PYTOSH MARK A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.12.2025 | 32,593 | +2,000 | — |
| PYTOSH MARK A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.12.2025 | 34,282 | +3,689 | — |
| PYTOSH MARK A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.12.2025 | 34,014 | +3,421 | — |
| PYTOSH MARK A | Disposition to the Company | 10.12.2025 | 30,593 | -3,421 | $94.92 |
| PYTOSH MARK A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.12.2025 | 0 | -2,000 | — |
| PYTOSH MARK A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.12.2025 | 3,688 | -3,689 | — |
| PYTOSH MARK A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.12.2025 | 6,840 | -3,421 | — |
| PYTOSH MARK A | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.12.2025 | 8,482 | +8,482 | — |
| ICAHN CARL C | Open Market Purchase | 22.4.2025 | 5,021 | +5,021 | $74.87 |
| ICAHN CARL C | Open Market Purchase | 21.4.2025 | 5,308 | +5,308 | $73.87 |
| ICAHN CARL C | Open Market Purchase | 17.4.2025 | 5,168 | +5,168 | $74.55 |
| ICAHN CARL C | Open Market Purchase | 16.4.2025 | 5,168 | +5,168 | $74.11 |
| ICAHN CARL C | Open Market Purchase | 15.4.2025 | 5,168 | +5,168 | $73.24 |
| ICAHN CARL C | Open Market Purchase | 14.4.2025 | 4,265 | +4,265 | $72.05 |
| ICAHN CARL C | Open Market Purchase | 11.4.2025 | 4,343 | +4,343 | $70.41 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
289,680 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 281,839 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
56.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 63.1% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology