Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$1.64
▼ $0.12 (-6.8%)
Market data updated: 09/20 02:04 AM
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$1.00B
Day Range
$1.60 - $1.77
52-Week Range
$1.60 - $2.70
Beta
—
Next Earnings
23.11.2026
Support
$1.60
Resistance
$1.95
TUYA is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
-37.6% (1Y)
🟡 Moderate
Strengths: 0/13 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
No notable strengths identified.
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.04 (3y annualized return 2.1% / max drawdown 60.1%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
Tuya (TUYA) exhibits a strong overall investor score of 78, driven primarily by robust technical indicators and positive news sentiment, though tempered by notable volatility and structural risks. The technical category scores 79, reflecting a mixed but constructive trend: the stock price sits above its 50-day moving average while remaining below the 200-day average, suggesting short-term momentum but potential long-term resistance. The MACD histogram and RSI (60.6) indicate healthy upward momentum, while the ADX (25.7) confirms a strong trend, though the %K (74.2) remains neutral. News sentiment is overwhelmingly positive, with recent announcements like the AI-focused Doova robot and revenue growth (16%) counterbalanced by a decline in operating cash flow (66%), highlighting operational challenges despite innovation. However, the risk category drags the score down to 42, with a high volatility measure (ATR: 3.2%) and a volatile volatility index (KLT: 0.05), revealing a historical 60.1% peak decline over three years. This volatility underscores the stock’s speculative nature, despite its technical and news-driven strengths.
The stock price is above its 50-day moving average but below the 200-day average, with a positive MACD histogram, RSI of 60.6 (indicating healthy momentum), and an ADX of 25.7 (strong trend). However, the %K (74.2) remains neutral, suggesting limited overbought conditions.
This mixed technical setup indicates short-term strength but potential long-term resistance, requiring careful monitoring of moving average crossovers.
Recent news highlights Tuya’s innovation focus, including AI-driven product launches (e.g., Doova) and revenue growth (16%), though operating cash flow declined sharply (66%). Sentiment remains predominantly positive, with no negative headlines.
Innovation and revenue growth are bullish signals, but declining cash flow raises operational efficiency concerns that could impact sustainability.
The stock exhibits high volatility (ATR: 3.2%) and a historically volatile volatility index (KLT: 0.05), with a 60.1% peak decline over three years, despite a modest annualized return of 2.8%.
This volatility suggests significant downside risk, particularly for investors sensitive to price swings or seeking stability.
StockIQ conclusion
Tuya’s investor score of 78 reflects a compelling blend of technical strength and positive news sentiment, but this is offset by high volatility and operational challenges. The stock demonstrates short-term momentum and innovation-driven momentum, yet structural risks—such as declining cash flow and historical volatility—remain critical considerations. Investors should monitor moving average crossovers, cash flow trends, and volume patterns to assess whether the current positive narrative can sustain momentum or if underlying risks will dominate.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
36
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
today · $1.64
Evidence: Panic-selling score jumped from 14 to 40 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
13
Risk
42
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Tuya Inc. has centered on its aggressive push into AI-driven smart home solutions. The company highlighted its innovations at IFA 2026, including the launch of **Doova**, an AI-powered robot designed for elderly seniors to provide safety, companionship, and smart home integration. Additionally, Tuya reported **16% revenue growth in Q2 2026**, driven by strong platform-as-a-service (PaaS) and smart home product sales, though operating cash flow declined sharply by 66%. Analysts noted AI advancements as a key growth driver despite margin pressures.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Tuya Inc. American Depositary Shares each representing one Class A Ordinary Share. News trend score: 92. Reason: 7 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
36
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
51
Fundamentals
—
Technical
13
Valuation
—
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Price (3M)
-12%
Market Narrative
49
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
-1
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
TUYA’s psychology is fragmented but anchored by **FOMO** (35) and **Anchoring** (38), with no dominant state. The narrative-reality gap (17) suggests optimism exceeds fundamentals, while positive momentum and sentiment fuel FOMO. Anchoring near resistance (3.1% below) may curb overconfidence, creating a tension between short-term excitement and structural resistance. The key question: *Will traders push past resistance or retreat to test it?*
Updated: 09/08/2026, 03:43 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Tuya Smart showcasing its latest advances in **physical AI** at IFA 2026 under the theme 'Hey Tuya.'"
"Tuya unveiled **Doova**, an AI home companion robot designed for seniors, combining **proactive safety, emotional intelligence, and smart home coordination**."
"**Revenue growth accelerated from 8.3% in Q1 to 16% in Q2**, with **record PaaS performance** and AI-driven advancements."
"**Operating cash flow fell 66%** while revenue grew 16%, raising concerns about **cash conversion efficiency**."
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 11D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 10/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for TUYA reflects deep methodological differences in how these investors approach valuation, risk, and market psychology. Edgar Lawrence Smith and Charles Mackay, both sensitive to market sentiment and growth potential, give it relatively higher scores—Smith due to lack of dividend/growth data (which might imply speculative appeal) and Mackay noting crowd excitement. In contrast, the efficient-market proponents like Malkiel/Bogle and Marks (Market Cycle) are far more skeptical, with the latter placing it mid-cycle and the former questioning its stock-picking edge. Meanwhile, fundamentalists like Graham, Fisher, and Lynch are stymied by insufficient data, while behavioral economists like Veblen and Nelson flag overvaluation risks or stretched cycles. Technical traders like Livermore and Schwager outright reject it, with Livermore’s trend-following rule and Schwager’s disciplined wizards’ caution overriding any growth narrative. The tension between speculative enthusiasm (Smith, Mackay) and disciplined skepticism (Livermore, Schwager, Housel) underscores the stock’s polarizing appeal.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 100
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 76
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 71
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 69
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 66
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 50
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 35
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 31
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 16
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 10
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 10 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 18.3.2026 | $0.061 |
| 17.3.2026 | $0.061 |
| 13.3.2025 | $0.061 |
| 12.3.2025 | $0.061 |
| 11.9.2024 | $0.059 |
| 10.9.2024 | $0.059 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 7 positive, 13 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 5.9.2026
PR Newswire · 5.9.2026
Yahoo · 5.9.2026
PR Newswire · 5.9.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
Insider Monkey · 27.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 27.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 25.8.2026
Yahoo · 25.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 25.8.2026
MT Newswires · 25.8.2026
MT Newswires · 25.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 25.8.2026
Benzinga · 25.8.2026
Yahoo · 25.8.2026
MarketBeat · 25.8.2026
Yahoo · 24.8.2026
PR Newswire · 24.8.2026
PR Newswire · 10.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 7.8.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Tuya Inc. American Depositary Shares each representing one Class A Ordinary Share (TUYA) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for TUYA specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
TUYA's technical score is 13/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.04 (3y annualized return 2.1% / max drawdown 60.1%); Price is below the 50-day average; Price is below the 200-day average.
Yes — TUYA has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 18 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUANG SIDNEY XUANDE | Tax Withholding in Shares | 6.7.2026 | 40,000 | -40,000 | $1.79 |
| HUANG SIDNEY XUANDE | Tax Withholding in Shares | 6.7.2026 | 237,500 | -40,000 | $1.79 |
| Zhang Yan (Claire) | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.5.2026 | 15,000 | -15,000 | — |
| Zhang Yan (Claire) | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.5.2026 | 15,000 | +15,000 | — |
| Zhang Yan (Claire) | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.5.2026 | 40,000 | +15,000 | — |
| Zhang Yan (Claire) | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 14.5.2026 | 15,000 | -15,000 | — |
| wang xueji | Other Transaction | 24.4.2026 | 75 | +75 | — |
| Chen Liaohan | Other Transaction | 24.4.2026 | 237 | +237 | — |
| wang xueji | Other Transaction | 24.4.2026 | 308 | +308 | — |
| Chen Liaohan | Other Transaction | 24.4.2026 | 237 | -237 | — |
| wang xueji | Other Transaction | 24.4.2026 | 75 | -75 | — |
| wang xueji | Other Transaction | 24.4.2026 | 308 | -308 | — |
| wang xueji | Other Transaction | 24.4.2026 | 73,915,805 | +308 | — |
| wang xueji | Other Transaction | 24.4.2026 | 34,784,195 | -308 | — |
| wang xueji | Other Transaction | 24.4.2026 | 1,431,225 | +75 | — |
| wang xueji | Other Transaction | 24.4.2026 | 8,567,775 | -75 | — |
| Chen Liaohan | Other Transaction | 24.4.2026 | 1,989,337 | +237 | — |
| Chen Liaohan | Other Transaction | 24.4.2026 | 26,810,663 | -237 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
3,068,926 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 3,523,906 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
40.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 42.6% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology