Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$13.64
▲ $0.31 (+2.3%)
Market data updated: 09/20 08:02 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$611.61M
Day Range
$13.19 - $13.65
52-Week Range
$8.14 - $17.56
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.12.2026
Support
$12.09
Resistance
$15.99
SWBI is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
+43.7% (1Y)
Strengths: 14/28 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 36.7%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is eroding over time
Quality
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
63
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
Not enough data yet to generate this synthesis.
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
79
Quality
42
Value
55
Momentum
67
Risk
48
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
47
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Everyone's writing about Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 14 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
27
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
36
Psychology
41
Fundamentals
47
Technical
67
Valuation
55
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
-15%
Market Narrative
60
Fundamental Reality
36
Narrative Gap
+24
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
📈 3D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jack Schwager — 23/100
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 71
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 69
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 69
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 67
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 62
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 61
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 58
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 56
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 53
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 51
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 47
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 44
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 44
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 25
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 23
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 282 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (7 bullish · 2 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
26.9%
Operating Margin
5.6%
Net Margin
3.5%
EBITDA Margin
11.6%
ROE
4.9%
ROA
3.6%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.42
Cash
$28.19M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
3.20
Debt/Equity
—
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 17.9.2026 | $0.130 |
| 1.7.2026 | $0.130 |
| 30.6.2026 | $0.130 |
| 19.3.2026 | $0.130 |
| 18.3.2026 | $0.130 |
| 18.12.2025 | $0.130 |
| 17.12.2025 | $0.130 |
| 18.9.2025 | $0.130 |
| 17.9.2025 | $0.130 |
| 7.7.2025 | $0.130 |
| 6.7.2025 | $0.130 |
| 20.3.2025 | $0.130 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$13.64
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$32,540.49
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
⚠️ Extreme
Model output is extreme — likely a data/model limitation for this stock, not a reliable fair-value read.
Year 1 Growth Rate
3.6%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.6% | $93.69M | $85.95M |
| 2 | 3.3% | $96.79M | $81.47M |
| 3 | 3.0% | $99.74M | $77.02M |
| 4 | 2.8% | $102.50M | $72.62M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $105.06M | $68.29M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$90.45M
Terminal Value
$1.66B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$1.08B
Enterprise Value
$1.46B
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$1.46B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$8,380.46
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$7,913.54
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 14 positive, 5 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 12.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 12.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
StockStory · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Motley Fool · 9.9.2026
StockStory · 5.9.2026
Yahoo · 5.9.2026
Investor's Business Daily · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Moby · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 4.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 4.9.2026
Benzinga · 4.9.2026
GuruFocus.com · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Benzinga · 4.9.2026
Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 63/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
SWBI currently scores 63/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
SWBI's technical score is 67/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 36.7%; Free cash flow growth: 413.7%; Net income growth: 37.7%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is eroding over time; Calmar: 0.09 (3y annualized return 5.0% / max drawdown 57.1%); Price is below the 50-day average.
Yes — SWBI has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tengwall Kyle | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.6.2026 | 7,721 | -7,721 | $14.35 |
| Tengwall Kyle | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.6.2026 | 147,517 | -7,721 | $14.35 |
| Smith Mark Peter | Tax Withholding in Shares | 2.5.2026 | 4,481 | -4,481 | $14.97 |
| Maxwell Kevin Alden | Tax Withholding in Shares | 2.5.2026 | 653 | -653 | $14.97 |
| McPherson Deana L | Tax Withholding in Shares | 2.5.2026 | 880 | -880 | $14.97 |
| Smith Mark Peter | Tax Withholding in Shares | 2.5.2026 | 576,386 | -4,481 | $14.97 |
| McPherson Deana L | Tax Withholding in Shares | 2.5.2026 | 158,754 | -880 | $14.97 |
| Maxwell Kevin Alden | Tax Withholding in Shares | 2.5.2026 | 121,635 | -653 | $14.97 |
| Maxwell Kevin Alden | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.5.2026 | 6,854 | -6,854 | $15.57 |
| McPherson Deana L | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.5.2026 | 27,612 | +27,612 | — |
| Maxwell Kevin Alden | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.5.2026 | 27,612 | +27,612 | — |
| Tengwall Kyle | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.5.2026 | 14,618 | +14,618 | — |
| Smith Mark Peter | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.5.2026 | 23,473 | -23,473 | $15.57 |
| McPherson Deana L | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.5.2026 | 6,660 | -6,660 | $15.57 |
| Maxwell Kevin Alden | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.5.2026 | 55,222 | +55,222 | — |
| McPherson Deana L | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.5.2026 | 55,222 | +55,222 | — |
| Tengwall Kyle | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.5.2026 | 29,234 | +29,234 | — |
| Smith Mark Peter | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.5.2026 | 90,956 | +90,956 | — |
| Smith Mark Peter | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.5.2026 | 181,912 | +181,912 | — |
| Smith Mark Peter | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.5.2026 | 604,340 | +90,956 | — |
| Smith Mark Peter | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.5.2026 | 580,867 | -23,473 | $15.57 |
| Smith Mark Peter | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.5.2026 | 181,912 | +181,912 | — |
| Tengwall Kyle | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.5.2026 | 155,238 | +14,618 | — |
| Tengwall Kyle | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.5.2026 | 29,234 | +29,234 | — |
| McPherson Deana L | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.5.2026 | 166,294 | +27,612 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
2,579,367 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 2,006,170 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
54.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 58.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology