Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Materials · ·
$44.33
▼ $1.15 (-2.5%)
Market data updated: 09/19 10:48 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$23.25B
Day Range
$44.19 - $45.39
52-Week Range
$32.73 - $52.65
Beta
—
Next Earnings
27.10.2026
Support
$41.70
Resistance
$51.99
SW is a stock from the Materials sector — Mining, chemicals, and metals — the raw materials that feed other industries, sensitive to commodity prices.
+0.4% (1Y)
Strengths: 5/28 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 47.7%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is eroding over time
Quality
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
50
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
74
Quality
42
Value
50
Momentum
36
Risk
42
Sentiment
80
Fundamental
38
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
SCANNING SW...
Recent media coverage of Smurfit WestRock has focused on its strong market sentiment and financial outlook, driven by industry dynamics. Analysts like Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley have raised their price targets to $53 and $58 respectively, maintaining a positive "Buy" or "Overweight" rating. The company benefits from rising North American containerboard prices due to supply constraints, including mill closures, despite softer demand for corrugated boxes. These factors suggest confidence in its packaging sector performance.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Smurfit Westrock. News trend score: 80. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 4 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
13
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
36
Psychology
60
Fundamentals
38
Technical
36
Valuation
50
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+0%
Market Narrative
53
Fundamental Reality
36
Narrative Gap
+17
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for SW suggests a **neutral-to-cautious stance** with no dominant psychological state, as all scores remain below 20. The narrative-reality gap (12) hints at a disconnect between investor perceptions (optimistic) and technical realities (muted momentum, modest outperformance). Low volatility (0.87x ATR) and neutral RSI (38) imply neither panic nor euphoria, while underperformance vs. peers (-3.4% vs. -0.1%) raises questions about relative positioning. The key open question: *Is the slight 200-day outperformance (+4.1%) enough to sustain cautious optimism, or will further underperformance trigger a shift?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 09:16 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Goldman Sachs Adjusts Price Target on Smurfit Westrock to $53 From $51"
"Mill closures are tightening containerboard supply and driving further price increases"
"North American containerboard prices rise as capacity cuts tighten supply"
📈 12D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 85/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 32/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among historical methodologies, with some seeing it as a high-potential opportunity and others flagging significant risks. The top-tier scores from **Samuel Armstrong Nelson (90)** and **Peter Lynch (85)** suggest it’s either near a cyclical bottom or a fast-growing underdog whose price hasn’t yet reflected its true potential—both approaches prioritizing momentum or growth over valuation. Meanwhile, **Edgar Lawrence Smith (72)** leans into a long-term hold, while **Charles Mackay (68)** warns of speculative crowd behavior, hinting at a bubble-like excitement. On the opposite end, the majority of methodologies—from **Jesse Livermore (38)** to **Morgan Housel (33)**—dismiss it outright, citing trend resistance, liquidity risks, or volatility that would deter patient investors. Even the mixed verdicts of **Howard Marks (43)** and **Burton Malkiel (46)** underscore uncertainty, questioning whether the stock’s merits justify active picking over passive strategies.
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 85
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 76
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 72
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 70
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 60
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 56
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 50
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 48
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 47
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 45
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 42
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 40
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 40
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 40
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 37
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 32
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 6 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
A trading range after an advance, but still without clear (volume-based) confirmation of a distribution phase.
Low confidence
$41.70
Range Bottom
$51.99
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
19.4%
Operating Margin
5.5%
Net Margin
2.2%
EBITDA Margin
13.7%
ROE
3.8%
ROA
1.5%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.34
Cash
$892.00M
Total Debt
$13.57B
Current Ratio
1.48
Debt/Equity
0.74
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 14.8.2026 | $0.452 |
| 15.5.2026 | $0.452 |
| 14.5.2026 | $0.452 |
| 17.2.2026 | $0.452 |
| 16.2.2026 | $0.452 |
| 15.8.2025 | $0.431 |
| 14.8.2025 | $0.431 |
| 16.5.2025 | $0.431 |
| 15.5.2025 | $0.431 |
| 14.2.2025 | $0.431 |
| 13.2.2025 | $0.431 |
| 15.11.2024 | $0.303 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$34.84
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$19.11
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 7 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 20 articles.
ChartMill · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Packaging Dive · 10.9.2026
ChartMill · 9.9.2026
MT Newswires · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Packaging Gateway · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
PR Newswire · 3.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 27.8.2026
Benzinga · 27.8.2026
Yahoo · 26.8.2026
MT Newswires · 26.8.2026
Yahoo · 25.8.2026
Packaging Dive · 25.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 14.8.2026
Yahoo · 14.8.2026
Barchart · 13.8.2026
Yahoo · 13.8.2026
Smurfit Westrock (SW) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 50/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
SW currently scores 50/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
SW's technical score is 36/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 47.7%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 62.2%; Net income growth: 119.1%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is eroding over time; Calmar: 0.17 (3y annualized return 7.1% / max drawdown 42.1%); Price is below the 50-day average.
Yes — SW has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mayer Saverio | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.8.2026 | 195 | +195 | — |
| Sellier Laurent | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.8.2026 | 234 | +234 | — |
| Henao Alvaro | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.8.2026 | 67 | +67 | — |
| Garren Ben | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.8.2026 | 71 | +71 | — |
| Page Irene | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.8.2026 | 29 | +29 | — |
| SMURFIT ANTHONY P J | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.8.2026 | 784 | +784 | — |
| Bowles Ken | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.8.2026 | 234 | +234 | — |
| Mayer Saverio | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 127 | +127 | — |
| SMURFIT ANTHONY P J | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 521 | +521 | — |
| Bowles Ken | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 150 | +150 | — |
| Henao Alvaro | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 223 | +223 | — |
| Sellier Laurent | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 359 | +359 | — |
| Garren Ben | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 60 | +60 | — |
| Mayer Saverio | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 432 | +432 | — |
| SMURFIT ANTHONY P J | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 975 | +975 | — |
| FergusonMchugh MaryLynn | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 51 | +51 | — |
| Sellier Laurent | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 150 | +150 | — |
| Henao Alvaro | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 38 | +38 | — |
| Bowles Ken | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 490 | +490 | — |
| Finan Irial | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 80 | +80 | — |
| SMURFIT ANTHONY P J | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 1,727,724 | +521 | — |
| SMURFIT ANTHONY P J | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 84,944 | +975 | — |
| WILSON ALAN D | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 66,907 | +721 | — |
| BERNLOHR TIMOTHY J | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 57,571 | +51 | — |
| Finan Irial | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.6.2026 | 58,898 | +80 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
22,504,988 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 25,227,020 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
63.0% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 66.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology