Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$518.68
▲ $12.96 (+2.6%)
Market data updated: 09/20 02:19 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$15.87B
Day Range
$499.56 - $519.89
52-Week Range
$281.58 - $1,005.68
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.11.2026
Support
$444.52
Resistance
$737.96
STRL is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
+48.8% (1Y)
Strengths: 16/32 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $232.26 vs. price $518.68 (-55.2%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
59
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
1d ago · $518.68
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 6 to 43 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
59
Quality
63
Value
33
Momentum
58
Risk
48
Sentiment
80
Fundamental
70
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) has primarily focused on its long-term growth and strategic expansion challenges. The company is highlighted as a strong "quality compounder" with consistent profit reinvestment, while also facing constraints due to tight electrical capacity, which may hinder its e-infrastructure growth. Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) are seen as a key strategy to address these limitations. Additionally, Sterling’s participation in investor conferences and its historical market outperformance over two decades have been noted.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.. News trend score: 80. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
41
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
64
Fundamentals
70
Technical
58
Valuation
33
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-40%
Market Narrative
85
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+43
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant **Loss Aversion** (77) reflects a market deeply anchored to recent losses (-35.1% in 3 months), with subdued trading activity (0.97x volume) suggesting hesitation to accelerate downward momentum. The **Overconfidence** (45) and **Euphoria** (35) scores—driven by extreme valuation (+116% DCF)—appear detached from observable price action, indicating a disconnect between narrative and reality. The key question is whether the **narrative gap** (30) will widen further as fundamentals diverge from price, or if a catalyst could force a re-evaluation of the stock’s valuation. The absence of panic or FOMO signals suggests a cautious, risk-averse stance persists despite positive sentiment.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 09:16 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Sterling Infrastructure (NASDAQ:STRL) has outperformed the market over the past 20 years by 8.95% on an annualized basis producing an average annual return of 18.19%"
"Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (NasdaqGS: STRL) announced management is participating in upcoming investor conferences"
"STRL's electrical capacity crunch is limiting faster E-Infrastructure growth, putting M&A at the center of its expansion strategy"
"Sterling Infrastructure passes all eight Navellier growth rules with strong earnings, margins, cash flow, and ROE"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 16D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Edgar Lawrence Smith — 70/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 7/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for STRL reflects a clash between cyclical, growth-oriented methodologies and more conservative, defensive frameworks. Howard Marks (Market Cycle) and Jack Schwager both see it as a mid-cycle opportunity with disciplined upside, while Edgar Lawrence Smith even suggests it could be a decade-long hold—implying strong long-term fundamentals. Meanwhile, Philip Fisher and Benjamin Graham’s strict criteria dismiss it outright, with Fisher citing a lack of quality/growth and Graham flagging defensive red flags. The middle ground—where investors like Peter Lynch or Gerald Loeb hesitate—highlights conflicting signals: some see manageable risk (e.g., Nelson’s mid-cycle neutrality), while others (like Loeb or Livermore) warn of structural vulnerabilities or trend resistance. The volatility concern from Morgan Housel further underscores the tension between patient, patient-oriented strategies and those prioritizing liquidity or trend alignment.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 70
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 67
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 65
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 56
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 54
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 50
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 47
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 45
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 44
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 43
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 41
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 38
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 29
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 18
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 15
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 7
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (7 bullish · 4 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
23.0%
Operating Margin
16.3%
Net Margin
11.7%
EBITDA Margin
19.4%
ROE
26.2%
ROA
11.0%
ROIC
—
EPS
$9.50
Cash
$390.72M
Total Debt
$291.05M
Current Ratio
1.01
Debt/Equity
0.26
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$518.68
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$232.26
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-55.2%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
12.1%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12.1% | $406.72M | $373.13M |
| 2 | 9.7% | $446.30M | $375.64M |
| 3 | 7.3% | $478.97M | $369.86M |
| 4 | 4.9% | $502.50M | $355.98M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $515.06M | $334.75M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$362.68M
Terminal Value
$8.12B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$5.28B
Enterprise Value
$7.09B
Net Debt
$-99.67M
Equity Value
$7.19B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$35.82
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$1.01
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 9 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 12.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Zacks · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 59/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
STRL currently scores 59/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, STRL's estimated fair value is $232.26, which is 55.2% below the current price of $518.68. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
STRL's technical score is 58/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Return on equity (ROE): 26.2% — strong; Debt/equity: 0.26.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $232.26 vs. price $518.68 (-55.2%); ATR: 5.9% of price; Free cash flow growth: -12.8%.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for STRL.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 3 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Govin Daniel P. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 6.8.2026 | 6,559 | -6,559 | $536.08 |
| Govin Daniel P. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 6.8.2026 | 43,485 | -6,559 | $536.08 |
| GRINDSTAFF NICHOLAS M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 10.7.2026 | 556 | -556 | $682.29 |
| GRINDSTAFF NICHOLAS M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 10.7.2026 | 6,037 | -556 | $682.29 |
| Wolf Mark D. | Open Market Sale | 25.6.2026 | 2,500 | -2,500 | $888.00 |
| Dill Julie | Gift | 18.6.2026 | 325 | -325 | — |
| Dill Julie | Gift | 18.6.2026 | 17,709 | -325 | — |
| CUTILLO JOSEPH A | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.5.2026 | 40,000 | +40,000 | — |
| CUTILLO JOSEPH A | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.5.2026 | 330,593 | +40,000 | — |
| Wilson Dwayne Andree | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2026 | 181 | +181 | — |
| Schulz David S. | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2026 | 181 | +181 | — |
| ROSE B ANDREW | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2026 | 181 | +181 | — |
| O'Brien Dana C. | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2026 | 181 | +181 | — |
| Dill Julie | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2026 | 181 | +181 | — |
| CREGG ROGER A | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2026 | 181 | +181 | — |
| Bosway William T | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2026 | 181 | +181 | — |
| O'Brien Dana C. | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2026 | 11,679 | +181 | — |
| CREGG ROGER A | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2026 | 45,333 | +181 | — |
| Dill Julie | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2026 | 18,034 | +181 | — |
| Wilson Dwayne Andree | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2026 | 12,470 | +181 | — |
| ROSE B ANDREW | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2026 | 654 | +181 | — |
| Schulz David S. | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2026 | 654 | +181 | — |
| Bosway William T | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.5.2026 | 2,198 | +181 | — |
| CUTILLO JOSEPH A | Open Market Sale | 23.4.2026 | 50,000 | -50,000 | $497.57 |
| CUTILLO JOSEPH A | Open Market Sale | 23.4.2026 | 290,593 | -50,000 | $497.57 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,203,339 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 1,165,489 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
48.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 58.6% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology