Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· ·
$76.09
▼ $0.68 (-0.9%)
Market data updated: 09/30 09:51 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/30/2026
News analyzed: 09/30/2026
Market Cap
$4.50B
Day Range
$75.97 - $77.27
52-Week Range
$75.71 - $95.31
Beta
—
Next Earnings
12.11.2026
Support
$75.71
Resistance
$84.65
-6.7% (1Y)
Strengths: 5/33 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Golden Cross
SMA 50 recently crossed above SMA 200
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Liquidity risk
Current ratio: 0.32
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
43
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
42
Quality
58
Value
55
Momentum
17
Risk
42
Sentiment
56
Fundamental
53
Institutional
75
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Spire Inc. has centered on its strategic shifts and financial performance following a major transformation. The company reported a narrower Q3 2026 adjusted loss of $15 million, reflecting its transition to a fully regulated utility model after divestitures and the $11.2 billion Tennessee acquisition. Analysts like Morgan Stanley maintained an *Overweight* rating but adjusted its price target downward to $91, while insider purchases—including a $99K investment by a VP—suggested confidence. Discussions also highlighted Spire’s dividend appeal amid market volatility and its long-term growth potential.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Spire Inc.. News trend score: 56. Reason: 6 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 5 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
18
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
90
Fundamentals
53
Technical
17
Valuation
55
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-5%
Market Narrative
39
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
-1
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant anchoring behavior (score 52) suggests traders are fixating on the 2.4% resistance level, possibly due to recent price action or historical support/resistance. The narrative gap (5 points) hints at a mild disconnect between market perception and fundamentals, though no extreme bias is evident. Low FOMO (score 4) and neutral RSI (52) indicate no urgency or overbought conditions. The key question is whether the stock’s proximity to resistance will trigger stop-loss activity or serve as a psychological barrier to further declines.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 01:14 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"completed divestitures that shifted its business profile to fully regulated operations"
"Krick Timothy W, VP at Spire, disclosed a significant insider purchase of $99K"
"Morgan Stanley maintains Spire with an Overweight rating"
"investors prefer dividend-yielding stocks with high cash flow"
📈 3D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 99/100
🔴 Weakest match
Walter Bagehot — 8/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark contrast in verdicts for SR reflects deep methodological divides between value, growth, and behavioral frameworks. Mackay’s high score suggests the stock lacks obvious speculative frenzy, aligning with his focus on avoiding crowd-driven bubbles, while Veblen’s moderate approval hints at growth that may genuinely reflect underlying productivity—though not enough to sway the more cautious investors. Meanwhile, Graham’s and Fisher’s low scores reveal a stock that fails their strict valuation and quality thresholds, with Fisher’s 27 indicating a lack of the signature growth and management excellence he prized. On the other end, Livermore’s and Schwager’s near-zero scores reflect a stock moving against prevailing trends or lacking the technical setups their disciplines demand, while Housel’s low rating underscores its volatility, which could deter patient, long-term holders. The divide between Marks’ cautious optimism and Loeb’s outright risk warning further highlights whether the stock’s strengths are offset by overinflated expectations or structural vulnerabilities.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 99
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 98
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 77
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 74
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 70
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 64
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 45
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 45
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 44
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 35
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 35
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 27
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 25
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 22
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 18
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 8
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 288 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 11 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
58.8%
Operating Margin
21.2%
Net Margin
11.0%
EBITDA Margin
33.2%
ROE
8.0%
ROA
2.3%
ROIC
—
EPS
$4.39
Cash
$5.70M
Total Debt
$3.86B
Current Ratio
0.32
Debt/Equity
1.14
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 11.9.2026 | $0.825 |
| 11.6.2026 | $0.825 |
| 10.6.2026 | $0.825 |
| 11.3.2026 | $0.825 |
| 10.3.2026 | $0.825 |
| 11.12.2025 | $0.825 |
| 10.12.2025 | $0.825 |
| 11.9.2025 | $0.785 |
| 10.9.2025 | $0.785 |
| 11.6.2025 | $0.785 |
| 10.6.2025 | $0.785 |
| 11.3.2025 | $0.785 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$76.09
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$162,839,219.50
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
⚠️ Extreme
Model output is extreme — likely a data/model limitation for this stock, not a reliable fair-value read.
Year 1 Growth Rate
4.7%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.7% | $-360.51M | $-330.74M |
| 2 | 4.1% | $-375.41M | $-315.97M |
| 3 | 3.6% | $-388.88M | $-300.29M |
| 4 | 3.0% | $-400.72M | $-283.88M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-410.74M | $-266.95M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-344.40M
Terminal Value
$-6.48B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-4.21B
Enterprise Value
$-5.71B
Net Debt
$3.85B
Equity Value
$-9.56B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$57,741,056.22
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$37,781,942.08
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 6 positive, 9 neutral, 5 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Insider Monkey · 29.9.2026
MT Newswires · 29.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 24.9.2026
MT Newswires · 14.9.2026
GuruFocus.com · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Zacks · 4.9.2026
Zacks · 2.9.2026
Benzinga · 21.8.2026
Benzinga · 18.8.2026
Benzinga · 13.8.2026
Motley Fool · 12.8.2026
Yahoo · 12.8.2026
MarketBeat · 9.8.2026
Yahoo · 9.8.2026
Moby · 5.8.2026
Yahoo · 5.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 5.8.2026
Yahoo · 5.8.2026
Spire Inc. (SR) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 43/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
SR currently scores 43/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
SR's technical score is 17/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: SMA 50 recently crossed above SMA 200; Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Gross margin: 58.8% — strong.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Current ratio: 0.32; Revenue growth (last year): -4.5%; Free cash flow growth: -774.0%.
Yes — SR has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 6 purchases and 2 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Krick Timothy W | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.8.2026 | 8,090 | +1,230 | $81.04 |
| Krick Timothy W | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.8.2026 | 1,230 | +1,230 | $81.04 |
| Woodard Adam W. | I | 15.6.2026 | 1,100 | +1,100 | $78.65 |
| Woodard Adam W. | I | 15.6.2026 | 7,039 | +1,100 | $78.65 |
| KOONCE PAUL D | Open Market Purchase | 11.6.2026 | 500 | +500 | $78.46 |
| KOONCE PAUL D | Open Market Purchase | 11.6.2026 | 8,000 | +500 | $78.46 |
| Hyman Ryan L | Open Market Sale | 9.6.2026 | 3,822 | -3,822 | $80.51 |
| Hyman Ryan L | Open Market Sale | 9.6.2026 | 14,295 | -3,822 | $80.51 |
| KOONCE PAUL D | Open Market Purchase | 1.6.2026 | 500 | +500 | $80.50 |
| KOONCE PAUL D | Open Market Purchase | 1.6.2026 | 7,500 | +500 | $80.50 |
| KOONCE PAUL D | Open Market Purchase | 8.5.2026 | 2,000 | +2,000 | $85.81 |
| KOONCE PAUL D | Open Market Purchase | 8.5.2026 | 7,000 | +2,000 | $85.81 |
| KOONCE PAUL D | Other Transaction | 13.2.2026 | 8,846 | -8,846 | $25.00 |
| KOONCE PAUL D | Other Transaction | 13.2.2026 | 0 | -8,846 | $25.00 |
| Ferrari Vincent J | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.2.2026 | 1,640 | +1,640 | $85.27 |
| Hightman Carrie J | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.2.2026 | 1,640 | +1,640 | $85.27 |
| KOONCE PAUL D | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.2.2026 | 1,640 | +1,640 | $85.27 |
| BORER MARK A | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.2.2026 | 1,640 | +1,640 | $85.27 |
| Jones Rob L. | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.2.2026 | 1,640 | +1,640 | $85.27 |
| Cook Sheri S | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.2.2026 | 1,640 | +1,640 | $85.27 |
| Newberry Brenda D | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.2.2026 | 1,640 | +1,640 | $85.27 |
| Fogarty Maria V. | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.2.2026 | 1,640 | +1,640 | $85.27 |
| BORER MARK A | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.2.2026 | 1,640 | +1,640 | $85.27 |
| Fogarty Maria V. | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.2.2026 | 3,390 | +1,640 | $85.27 |
| Cook Sheri S | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.2.2026 | 1,640 | +1,640 | $85.27 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
2,909,698 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 2,684,049 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
55.8% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 65.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology