Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· · NASDAQ
$519.10
▲ $17.04 (+3.4%)
Market data updated: 09/17 10:51 PM
News analyzed: 09/17/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$514.80 - $520.42
52-Week Range
$260.44 - $655.95
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
+93.5% (1Y)
⚠️ Insufficient data for a reliable StockIQ Score
Only 3 of 7 categories available — Fundamental, Growth, Valuation, Quality unavailable.
Strengths: 1/13 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 200
Price is above the 200-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is below the 50-day average
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 1 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 1
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
SOXX’s overall score of 51 reflects a mixed technical and risk profile, tempered by a strong news sentiment. The technical category (37) is weighed down by weak momentum indicators—such as the negative MACD histogram and RSI of 49.0—alongside the price trading below its 50-day average and support level (SAR), signaling a short-term downtrend. However, the stock’s position above the 200-day average suggests some resilience in the longer term. Meanwhile, the risk category (50) highlights volatility (3.5% ATR) but is balanced by a historically high annualized return (45.0%) despite a significant drawdown (41.7%). The news category (86) stands out as a bright spot, with multiple positive mentions of semiconductor leadership, AI-driven growth, and sector-wide strength—particularly in chip stocks like NVIDIA and AMD—offsetting neutral/negative headlines about broader market volatility or individual company guidance. This divergence underscores that while SOXX’s fundamentals may be under pressure in the near term, its sector alignment with high-growth trends could mitigate risks over time.
The stock exhibits short-term weakness with a negative MACD, RSI below 50, and a price below its 50-day average, but it remains above its 200-day average, indicating a potential consolidation phase.
Short-term momentum and support levels are critical for traders, while longer-term averages provide context for underlying strength or weakness.
Recent news is overwhelmingly positive, with frequent mentions of semiconductor sector strength, AI-driven revenue growth, and favorable macroeconomic data, despite isolated negative headlines.
Positive news sentiment can drive investor confidence and volume, potentially counteracting technical headwinds.
The stock demonstrates high volatility (3.5% ATR) but has delivered strong historical returns (45.0% annualized) with a notable drawdown (41.7%), suggesting resilience amid volatility.
High volatility and drawdowns indicate potential for significant gains or losses, requiring careful risk management.
StockIQ conclusion
SOXX presents a nuanced profile where technical weakness and short-term underperformance are partially offset by strong sector fundamentals and positive news sentiment. While the stock’s volatility and drawdowns introduce risk, its alignment with high-growth trends in semiconductors and AI could provide tailwinds if momentum reverses. Investors should monitor technical support levels and sector-specific catalysts to assess whether the current downtrend is temporary or indicative of deeper challenges.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
49
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
today · $502.06
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from -29 to -2 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
1d ago · $498.85
Evidence: Panic-selling score jumped from 1 to 28 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
2d ago · $497.40
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from 16 to -14 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
11d ago · $519.86
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from -19 to 9 day-over-day
What happened after
15d ago · $503.49
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from 9 to -19 day-over-day
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
29
Risk
50
Sentiment
98
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of the **iShares Semiconductor ETF** has centered on broader semiconductor sector trends, particularly the volatility and opportunities tied to AI-driven demand. Qualcomm’s rebound—highlighted by its Amazon deal—has drawn attention as a key driver for ETF exposure, while broader semiconductor ETFs face mixed outlooks due to rising risks like political backlash against AI infrastructure and financing fragility. Intel’s advancements in chip manufacturing and optics stocks’ divergent performances further underscore sector dynamics.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about iShares Semiconductor ETF. News trend score: 98. Reason: 13 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 5 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
25
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
43
Fundamentals
—
Technical
29
Valuation
—
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-17%
Market Narrative
57
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+7
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for SOXX suggests a dominant narrative-reality disconnect (gap: 16) with **euphoria** (37) as the primary psychological state, driven by extreme outperformance (+22.1% above 200-day average) and uniformly positive sentiment. Momentum and volume support FOMO (17), but volatility remains subdued, mitigating panic. The key open question is whether this euphoria reflects justified fundamentals or speculative overreach, given the lack of anchoring or loss aversion signals. The absence of herding, overconfidence, or confirmation bias suggests a more measured, though still elevated, bullish sentiment.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 09:13 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"AI infrastructure demand is strong"
"Qualcomm is rated a 'Strong Buy' with a $360/share FY 2029 target, driven by aggressive diversification into non-handset segments"
"growing political backlash against U.S. data center buildouts"
"millions of investors who own the stock without realizing it through ETFs"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 7D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 90/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 16/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for SOXX reflects deep methodological differences in how these investors approach valuation, risk, and market timing. At the top, Edgar Lawrence Smith’s near-perfect score suggests he might have seen potential in dividend or growth trends, though the lack of data prevents a definitive call—unlike his usual precision. Meanwhile, the efficient-market camp (Malkiel/Bogle) and Jesse Livermore’s neutral stance imply they’d either dismiss active picking here or avoid it due to unclear momentum, aligning with their skepticism of stock-specific outperformance. On the cautionary end, the cluster of mid-to-low scores—from Gerald Loeb’s moderate risk flag to Morgan Housel’s volatility warning—highlights concerns about overvaluation, cyclicality, or speculative crowd behavior, particularly in a late-cycle market as Marks’ cycle analysis suggests. Even where data gaps prevent a full Graham, Fisher, or Lynch assessment, the consensus leans toward hesitation, with only Smith’s framework offering any theoretical optimism—though that’s tempered by the absence of concrete fundamentals.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 90
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 62
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 56
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 50
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 41
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 41
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 39
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 36
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 16
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 276 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 7 bearish · 3 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 15.6.2026 | $0.283 |
| 17.3.2026 | $0.208 |
| 16.12.2025 | $0.436 |
| 16.9.2025 | $0.541 |
| 16.6.2025 | $0.483 |
| 18.3.2025 | $0.261 |
| 17.12.2024 | $0.358 |
| 25.9.2024 | $0.552 |
| 11.6.2024 | $0.310 |
| 21.3.2024 | $0.225 |
| 20.12.2023 | $0.374 |
| 26.9.2023 | $0.555 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 13 positive, 2 neutral, 5 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for SOXX specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
SOXX's technical score is 29/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 200-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is below the 50-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; -23.5% over the last 3 months relative to the index.
Yes — SOXX has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 0 filings.
No recent insider transaction filings found for this stock.
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
13,006,049 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 12,611,021 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
51.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 48.2% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology