Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Energy · ·
$4.56
▲ $0.21 (+4.8%)
Market data updated: 09/20 07:43 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$874.93M
Day Range
$4.30 - $4.67
52-Week Range
$2.88 - $24.85
Beta
—
Next Earnings
11.11.2026
Support
$3.74
Resistance
$5.43
SOC is a stock from the Energy sector — Oil, gas, and renewable energy — highly volatile profitability, dependent on global commodity prices.
-81.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 3/24 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 54.6%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 8.6% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
39
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
66
Quality
50
Value
55
Momentum
16
Risk
20
Sentiment
38
Fundamental
33
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Sable Offshore Corp. has centered on legal and operational challenges surrounding its California pipeline, particularly the **Santa Ynez Pipeline**. The company faced a **$1.5 million fine** for violating a consent decree, with a court denying the Trump administration’s attempt to terminate it. A federal judge later ruled that operations could continue under federal oversight, temporarily easing legal uncertainty and boosting the stock. Analysts also noted a **22.5% drop in price targets**, reflecting ongoing concerns over regulatory hurdles and financial penalties.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Sable Offshore Corp.. News trend score: 38. Reason: 5 of the last 20 articles are negative, versus 3 positive.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
15
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
55
Fundamentals
33
Technical
16
Valuation
55
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-55%
Market Narrative
34
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
-16
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s extreme loss aversion (100) suggests investors are clinging to positions despite a 61.3% three-month collapse, with volume near stagnation reinforcing reluctance to exit. Herding (54) is present but selective, as the stock lags peers, implying cautious participation rather than herd-driven rallies. The narrative gap (-9) hints at a disconnect between investor perceptions (optimistic) and reality (deteriorating fundamentals), potentially fueling defensive holding. The key question: Will the 0.62x volume persist, or will a spike signal capitulation—or a rare reversal attempt?
Updated: 09/09/2026, 12:36 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"$1.5 million fine imposed for violating consent decree"
"federal judge rules pipeline can continue operating under federal rules"
"SOC stock eyes best day in 1.5 months after court ruling"
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with some seeing high potential while others flag severe risks. Charles Mackay’s near-perfect score suggests no crowd-driven mania, while Peter Lynch’s growth-focused approach sees undervaluation relative to its potential, both signaling optimism. In contrast, the Graham disciplines—both Defensive and Enterprising—reject it outright, citing insufficient margin of safety, while Livermore and Schwager’s trend-following and disciplined wizardry frameworks dismiss it entirely due to perceived negative momentum. Meanwhile, Fisher’s lack of conviction and Veblen’s critique of speculative growth align with the more cautious warnings from Loeb, Bagehot, and Housel, who highlight volatility, risk, and liquidity concerns. Marks’ cyclical view splits between early-cycle optimism and broader mixed signals, while Nelson’s mid-cycle neutrality leaves no strong edge.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 100
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 95
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 84
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 71
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 55
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 43
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 40
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 31
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 28
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 14
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 13
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 8
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 8
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 0
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 282 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 9 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
—
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
-76.8%
ROA
-23.6%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$4.18
Cash
$97.68M
Total Debt
$921.58M
Current Ratio
0.13
Debt/Equity
1.72
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$5.44
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$5.44
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 3 positive, 12 neutral, 5 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 3.9.2026
Fintel · 28.8.2026
MT Newswires · 24.8.2026
Benzinga · 24.8.2026
Benzinga · 20.8.2026
Stocktwits · 19.8.2026
Yahoo · 19.8.2026
MT Newswires · 19.8.2026
MT Newswires · 19.8.2026
Zacks · 19.8.2026
Yahoo · 19.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 12.8.2026
Yahoo · 12.8.2026
Rigzone.com · 12.8.2026
Yahoo · 11.8.2026
MarketBeat · 11.8.2026
Yahoo · 11.8.2026
Zacks · 11.8.2026
Business Wire · 10.8.2026
Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 39/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
SOC currently scores 39/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
SOC's technical score is 16/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 54.6%; Net income growth: 33.6%; NAV per share: $5.44.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 8.6% of price; Current ratio: 0.13; Calmar: -0.27 (3y annualized return -24.2% / max drawdown 90.7%).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for SOC.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 6 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dillard Michael E. | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.5.2026 | 50,000 | +50,000 | — |
| Sarofim Christopher Binyon | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.5.2026 | 25,000 | +25,000 | — |
| Pipkin Gregory Phillip | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.5.2026 | 50,000 | +50,000 | — |
| Pipkin Gregory Phillip | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.5.2026 | 168,040 | +50,000 | — |
| Dillard Michael E. | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.5.2026 | 497,500 | +50,000 | — |
| Sarofim Christopher Binyon | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.5.2026 | 949,653 | +25,000 | — |
| FLORES JAMES C | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.4.2026 | 175,000 | -175,000 | — |
| Patrinely Gregory D. | Open Market Sale | 29.4.2026 | 39,311 | -39,311 | $13.56 |
| Flores James Caldwell | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.4.2026 | 100,000 | -100,000 | — |
| Duenner Anthony | Open Market Sale | 29.4.2026 | 39,312 | -39,312 | $13.56 |
| Flores James Caldwell | Open Market Sale | 29.4.2026 | 39,311 | -39,311 | $13.56 |
| Duenner Anthony | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.4.2026 | 100,000 | -100,000 | — |
| Patrinely Gregory D. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.4.2026 | 100,000 | -100,000 | — |
| FLORES JAMES C | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.4.2026 | 175,000 | +175,000 | — |
| Flores James Caldwell | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.4.2026 | 100,000 | +100,000 | — |
| FLORES JAMES C | Open Market Sale | 29.4.2026 | 68,792 | -68,792 | $13.56 |
| Duenner Anthony | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.4.2026 | 100,000 | +100,000 | — |
| Patrinely Gregory D. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.4.2026 | 100,000 | +100,000 | — |
| FLORES JAMES C | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.4.2026 | 8,242,453 | +175,000 | — |
| FLORES JAMES C | Open Market Sale | 29.4.2026 | 8,173,661 | -68,792 | $13.56 |
| FLORES JAMES C | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.4.2026 | 3,150,000 | -175,000 | — |
| Patrinely Gregory D. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.4.2026 | 602,051 | +100,000 | — |
| Patrinely Gregory D. | Open Market Sale | 29.4.2026 | 562,740 | -39,311 | $13.56 |
| Patrinely Gregory D. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.4.2026 | 800,000 | -100,000 | — |
| Duenner Anthony | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.4.2026 | 630,176 | +100,000 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
45,468,327 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 43,009,412 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
40.8% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 25.7% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology