Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$258.19
▲ $1.44 (+0.6%)
Market data updated: 09/30 02:43 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/30/2026
News analyzed: 09/30/2026
Market Cap
$20.64B
Day Range
$254.24 - $259.62
52-Week Range
$142.22 - $298.77
Beta
—
Next Earnings
06.01.2027
Support
$237.21
Resistance
$298.77
SNX is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
+54.8% (1Y)
Strengths: 6/29 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 25.2%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is eroding over time
Quality
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
50
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
6d ago · $291.93
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 57)
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
6d ago · $291.93
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 28 to 64 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
68
Quality
47
Value
50
Momentum
29
Risk
48
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
42
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of TD SYNNEX Corporation has primarily focused on its upcoming third-quarter fiscal 2026 earnings report, scheduled for September 24, 2026, with an accompanying earnings call. The company has not been directly mentioned in broader industry trends like AI infrastructure or competitor moves, and available sources lack detailed updates on its operations or strategic initiatives beyond this financial announcement.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about TD SYNNEX Corporation. News trend score: 100. Reason: 14 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
33
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
37
Psychology
35
Fundamentals
42
Technical
29
Valuation
50
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
-2%
Market Narrative
59
Fundamental Reality
37
Narrative Gap
+22
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for SNX suggests a dominant anchoring effect, as the stock’s proximity to resistance (2.4%) may be reinforcing price expectations. FOMO and euphoria coexist but are secondary, driven by momentum and extreme sentiment. The narrative gap (69 vs. 37) hints at a disconnect between optimism and fundamentals, while overconfidence—evidenced by price outpacing EPS growth—may cloud rational assessment. The key question is whether traders will break free from resistance or double down on anchoring, given the lack of panic or herd-driven corrections.
Updated: 09/07/2026, 05:49 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"TD SYNNEX (NYSE: SNX) today announced it will report its financial results for its third fiscal quarter 2026, ended August 31, 2026"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 6D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 82/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 13/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with some legendary investors seeing long-term potential while others flag serious red flags. The highest scorers—Edgar Lawrence Smith and Morgan Housel—both advocate for patient, decade-long holding, emphasizing its potential as a quiet compounder, suggesting they’d prioritize fundamentals and patience over short-term noise. Meanwhile, Peter Lynch’s mixed verdict hints at a stock where growth is real but already baked into the price, reflecting a more cautious optimism. On the opposite end, the lowest scores—from Benjamin Graham (both versions) and Philip Fisher—reveal a stark contrast, as these methodologies demand rigorous valuation discipline and quality traits that this stock fails to meet. The middle ground, where investors like Gerald Loeb and Howard Marks (in different frameworks) express moderate caution, underscores a tension between recognizing growth and questioning whether the market’s expectations are already inflated or the risks overstated.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 82
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 67
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 62
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 62
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 56
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 52
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 46
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 45
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 44
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 43
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 43
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 40
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 31
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 29
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 19
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 13
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 288 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 7 bearish · 3 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
7.0%
Operating Margin
2.3%
Net Margin
1.3%
EBITDA Margin
2.9%
ROE
9.8%
ROA
2.4%
ROIC
—
EPS
$9.99
Cash
$2.44B
Total Debt
$1.02B
Current Ratio
1.21
Debt/Equity
0.12
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 17.7.2026 | $0.480 |
| 16.7.2026 | $0.480 |
| 15.4.2026 | $0.480 |
| 14.4.2026 | $0.480 |
| 16.1.2026 | $0.480 |
| 15.1.2026 | $0.480 |
| 17.10.2025 | $0.440 |
| 16.10.2025 | $0.440 |
| 11.7.2025 | $0.440 |
| 10.7.2025 | $0.440 |
| 11.4.2025 | $0.440 |
| 10.4.2025 | $0.440 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$102.52
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$6.99
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 14 positive, 4 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 29.9.2026
Yahoo · 29.9.2026
Benzinga · 29.9.2026
Yahoo · 28.9.2026
Yahoo · 28.9.2026
Yahoo · 28.9.2026
Yahoo · 28.9.2026
Investing.com · 28.9.2026
Yahoo · 25.9.2026
StockStory · 25.9.2026
Benzinga · 25.9.2026
MT Newswires · 25.9.2026
Yahoo · 25.9.2026
Zacks · 25.9.2026
Benzinga · 25.9.2026
Yahoo · 25.9.2026
Zacks · 25.9.2026
Yahoo · 25.9.2026
StockStory · 25.9.2026
Benzinga · 25.9.2026
TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 50/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
SNX currently scores 50/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
SNX's technical score is 29/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 25.2%; Net income growth: 20.1%; Debt/equity: 0.12.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is eroding over time; ATR: 4.4% of price; Price is below the 50-day average.
Yes — SNX has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 25 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| POLK DENNIS | Open Market Sale | 15.9.2026 | 200 | -200 | $266.78 |
| POLK DENNIS | Open Market Sale | 15.9.2026 | 400 | -400 | $264.31 |
| POLK DENNIS | Open Market Sale | 15.9.2026 | 700 | -700 | $263.41 |
| POLK DENNIS | Open Market Sale | 15.9.2026 | 100 | -100 | $265.67 |
| POLK DENNIS | Open Market Sale | 15.9.2026 | 800 | -800 | $262.76 |
| POLK DENNIS | Open Market Sale | 15.9.2026 | 300 | -300 | $267.45 |
| POLK DENNIS | Open Market Sale | 15.9.2026 | 70,147 | -700 | $263.41 |
| POLK DENNIS | Open Market Sale | 15.9.2026 | 69,747 | -400 | $264.31 |
| POLK DENNIS | Open Market Sale | 15.9.2026 | 70,847 | -800 | $262.76 |
| POLK DENNIS | Open Market Sale | 15.9.2026 | 69,147 | -300 | $267.45 |
| POLK DENNIS | Open Market Sale | 15.9.2026 | 69,447 | -200 | $266.78 |
| POLK DENNIS | Open Market Sale | 15.9.2026 | 69,647 | -100 | $265.67 |
| POLK DENNIS | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 72,547 | -100 | $261.97 |
| POLK DENNIS | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 71,647 | -500 | $264.44 |
| POLK DENNIS | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 73,747 | -400 | $258.68 |
| POLK DENNIS | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 72,147 | -200 | $263.48 |
| POLK DENNIS | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 73,247 | -500 | $259.58 |
| POLK DENNIS | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 72,647 | -600 | $260.27 |
| POLK DENNIS | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 72,347 | -200 | $262.39 |
| POLK DENNIS | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 500 | -500 | $264.44 |
| POLK DENNIS | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 400 | -400 | $258.68 |
| POLK DENNIS | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 200 | -200 | $262.39 |
| POLK DENNIS | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 100 | -100 | $261.97 |
| POLK DENNIS | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 600 | -600 | $260.27 |
| POLK DENNIS | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 200 | -200 | $263.48 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,572,874 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 1,652,704 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
57.5% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 53.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology