Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· ·
$31.85
▼ $0.13 (-0.4%)
Market data updated: 09/30 10:18 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/30/2026
News analyzed: 09/30/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$31.75 - $32.35
52-Week Range
$20.11 - $39.27
Beta
—
Next Earnings
22.10.2026
Support
$30.90
Resistance
$39.24
+50.5% (1Y)
Strengths: 6/30 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Leverage risk
Debt/equity: 0.13
Risk
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $20.63 vs. price $31.85 (-35.2%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
45
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
42
Quality
47
Value
33
Momentum
25
Risk
54
Sentiment
98
Fundamental
49
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Schneider National, Inc. has highlighted its strategic positioning in the transportation sector amid industry challenges. The company’s CEO emphasized balancing legacy operations with innovation, while reports noted labor shortages—particularly drayage drivers—leading carriers like Schneider to reduce outsourcing. Additionally, Schneider’s ongoing partnership with M&M Transport Services was praised for fostering growth and stability. Analyst mentions and industry comparisons were brief, focusing on Schneider’s resilience rather than specific financial or operational details.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Schneider National, Inc.. News trend score: 98. Reason: 12 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 4 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
29
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
37
Psychology
45
Fundamentals
49
Technical
25
Valuation
33
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-11%
Market Narrative
68
Fundamental Reality
37
Narrative Gap
+31
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant overconfidence (score 45) suggests traders are overestimating SNDR’s value, as price momentum fails to align with fundamental growth while trading 69% above DCF. Euphoria (35) further indicates detached valuation optimism, fueled by extreme sentiment and modest momentum. The 40-point narrative gap (77 vs. 37) reinforces this disconnect, where perception far exceeds observable fundamentals. The key question is whether this overvaluation will persist or correct under pressure, given the lack of anchoring or loss aversion signals. FOMO (15) hints at late-cycle participation, but panic remains suppressed by low volatility and positive sentiment.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 05:10 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Schneider CEO Jim Filter discusses 'leading legacy and disruption in lockstep' (NYSE)"
"'Schneider and M&M Transport Services continue to deliver growth, stability and reliability' (Business Wire)"
"'Carriers limit outsourcing amid shortage of drayage drivers' (Trucking Dive)"
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 91/100
🔴 Weakest match
Thorstein Veblen — 12/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for SNDR reflects deep philosophical and methodological splits among these investors. The highest-scoring approaches—Bagehot’s liquidity focus and Schwager’s disciplined trend-following—see it as a resilient or high-reward opportunity, prioritizing survival or risk-adjusted returns. Meanwhile, Graham’s strict valuation and Fisher’s quality-growth criteria dismiss it outright, while Veblen’s consumerist skepticism flags it as speculative. The middle ground, from Marks to Housel, suggests it’s a ‘holdable’ but not transformative pick, with mixed signals on value or timing. This tension mirrors whether the stock’s strengths lie in defensive resilience, speculative momentum, or fundamental undervaluation—or if it’s simply too ambiguous for any single framework.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 91
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 82
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 68
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 67
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 67
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 61
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 60
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 59
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 42
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 42
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 38
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 38
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 35
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 29
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 19
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 12
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 289 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 8 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
3.0%
Net Margin
1.8%
EBITDA Margin
10.9%
ROE
3.4%
ROA
2.1%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.59
Cash
$201.50M
Total Debt
$397.00M
Current Ratio
2.13
Debt/Equity
0.13
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 11.9.2026 | $0.100 |
| 12.6.2026 | $0.100 |
| 11.6.2026 | $0.100 |
| 13.3.2026 | $0.100 |
| 12.3.2026 | $0.100 |
| 12.12.2025 | $0.095 |
| 11.12.2025 | $0.095 |
| 12.9.2025 | $0.095 |
| 11.9.2025 | $0.095 |
| 13.6.2025 | $0.095 |
| 12.6.2025 | $0.095 |
| 14.3.2025 | $0.095 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$31.85
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$20.63
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-35.2%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-4.4%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -4.4% | $272.77M | $250.25M |
| 2 | -2.7% | $265.42M | $223.40M |
| 3 | -1.0% | $262.87M | $202.98M |
| 4 | 0.8% | $264.89M | $187.66M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $271.51M | $176.47M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$285.40M
Terminal Value
$4.28B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$2.78B
Enterprise Value
$3.82B
Net Debt
$195.50M
Equity Value
$3.63B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$17.20
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$14.86
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 12 positive, 4 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Zacks · 30.9.2026
Zacks · 30.9.2026
InvestorsHub · 28.9.2026
Yahoo · 28.9.2026
Zacks · 25.9.2026
Yahoo · 25.9.2026
Zacks · 24.9.2026
Yahoo · 24.9.2026
Zacks · 23.9.2026
Yahoo · 23.9.2026
Zacks · 23.9.2026
Yahoo · 23.9.2026
Zacks · 23.9.2026
Yahoo · 23.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 22.9.2026
Yahoo · 22.9.2026
StockStory · 22.9.2026
Yahoo · 22.9.2026
StockStory · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Schneider National, Inc. (SNDR) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 45/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
SNDR currently scores 45/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, SNDR's estimated fair value is $20.63, which is 35.2% below the current price of $31.85. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
SNDR's technical score is 25/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Debt/equity: 0.13; Current ratio: 2.13; Price is above the 200-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $20.63 vs. price $31.85 (-35.2%); Operating margin is eroding over time; Calmar: 0.14 (3y annualized return 5.4% / max drawdown 39.8%).
Yes — SNDR has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 7 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schneider Paul J. | Gift | 18.9.2026 | 3,000 | -3,000 | — |
| Schneider Paul J. | Gift | 18.9.2026 | 430,719 | -3,000 | — |
| Rourke Mark B. | Open Market Sale | 4.8.2026 | 13,208 | -13,208 | $35.58 |
| Rourke Mark B. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.8.2026 | 15,474 | -15,474 | — |
| Rourke Mark B. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.8.2026 | 13,208 | -13,208 | — |
| Rourke Mark B. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.8.2026 | 15,474 | +15,474 | $20.96 |
| Rourke Mark B. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.8.2026 | 13,208 | +13,208 | $24.81 |
| Rourke Mark B. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.8.2026 | 24,000 | -24,000 | — |
| Rourke Mark B. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.8.2026 | 24,000 | +24,000 | $20.96 |
| Rourke Mark B. | Open Market Sale | 4.8.2026 | 15,474 | -15,474 | $35.98 |
| Rourke Mark B. | Open Market Sale | 4.8.2026 | 24,000 | -24,000 | $36.12 |
| Rourke Mark B. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.8.2026 | 245,522 | +24,000 | $20.96 |
| Rourke Mark B. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.8.2026 | 234,730 | +13,208 | $24.81 |
| Rourke Mark B. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.8.2026 | 250,204 | +15,474 | $20.96 |
| Rourke Mark B. | Open Market Sale | 4.8.2026 | 234,730 | -15,474 | $35.98 |
| Rourke Mark B. | Open Market Sale | 4.8.2026 | 221,522 | -13,208 | $35.58 |
| Rourke Mark B. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.8.2026 | 15,474 | -24,000 | — |
| Rourke Mark B. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 4.8.2026 | 0 | -15,474 | — |
| Rourke Mark B. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 3.8.2026 | 20,312 | -20,312 | — |
| Rourke Mark B. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 3.8.2026 | 20,312 | +20,312 | $24.81 |
| Rourke Mark B. | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 20,312 | -20,312 | $35.18 |
| Rourke Mark B. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 3.8.2026 | 241,834 | +20,312 | $24.81 |
| Rourke Mark B. | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 221,522 | -20,312 | $35.18 |
| Rourke Mark B. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 3.8.2026 | 13,208 | -20,312 | — |
| GIERTZ JAMES R | Grant/Award from Employer | 10.7.2026 | 11.9 | +11.9 | $36.40 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
5,972,322 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 5,941,386 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
52.7% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 59.7% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology