Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Energy · ·
$33.78
▲ $0.67 (+2.0%)
Market data updated: 09/30 09:11 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/30/2026
News analyzed: 09/30/2026
Market Cap
$8.03B
Day Range
$33.13 - $34.81
52-Week Range
$17.45 - $41.56
Beta
—
Next Earnings
29.10.2026
Support
$28.20
Resistance
$41.56
SM is a stock from the Energy sector — Oil, gas, and renewable energy — highly volatile profitability, dependent on global commodity prices.
+35.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 8/29 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 4.4% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
49
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
today · $33.78
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from 23 to -6 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
today · $33.78
Evidence: Panic-selling score jumped from 0 to 25 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
43
Quality
58
Value
55
Momentum
33
Risk
26
Sentiment
56
Fundamental
65
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of SM Energy Company highlights its stock performance and analyst reactions. The company’s shares have surged 31% since its last earnings report, sparking speculation about future growth. Analysts like Seaport Global initiated coverage with a Sell rating and a $35 price target, contrasting with bullish technical signals—such as passing growth momentum screens—suggesting mixed investor sentiment. Dividend activity and momentum-driven stock discussions also feature prominently.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about SM Energy Company. News trend score: 56. Reason: 7 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 6 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
22
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
41
Psychology
25
Fundamentals
65
Technical
33
Valuation
55
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+26%
Market Narrative
35
Fundamental Reality
41
Narrative Gap
-6
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant herding state (48) reflects traders aligning with peers (+4.9% AMPY/BE/BHP) after SM’s modest +2.5% gain, despite its lagging momentum. Euphoria (37) persists due to +21.7% 200-day outperformance and extreme positive sentiment (98/100), masking weak short-term momentum. Anchoring (15) hints at traders focusing on the 4.3% resistance gap, while FOMO (24) remains muted by neutral volume and negative ROC. The key question: *Will the gap between narrative (62) and reality (41) widen as fundamentals diverge from price momentum?*
Updated: 09/08/2026, 05:05 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"SM Energy (SM) reported earnings 30 days ago. What's next for the stock? We take a look at earnings estimates for some clues."
"Seaport Global analyst initiates coverage on SM Energy (NYSE:SM) with a Sell rating and announces Price Target of $35."
"SM Energy passes Minervini's Trend Template and High Growth Momentum screen, combining strong technicals with accelerating fundamentals."
"Dividend Champion, Contender, And Challenger Highlights: Week August 30 — Dividend activity recap for Champions, Contenders & Challengers."
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 5D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 89/100
🔴 Weakest match
Gerald M. Loeb — 24/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among historical methodologies, with some legendary investors seeing it as a long-term gem while others warn of hidden risks or overvaluation. The highest scores—from Edgar Lawrence Smith (83), Philip Fisher (75), and Defensive Graham (74)—suggest a fundamentally strong, durable business worthy of a patient, buy-and-hold approach, praising its quality and potential for decade-long growth. Conversely, the lower scores—particularly from risk-averse thinkers like Gerald M. Loeb (31), Walter Bagehot (26), and Howard Marks (34)—flag concerns over valuation, liquidity, or market timing, painting a picture of a stock that may be stretched or vulnerable to volatility. Even growth-focused investors like Peter Lynch (45) and Jesse Livermore (48) hesitate, noting that the price already reflects much of its upside or lacks clear momentum, while behavioral economists like Charles Mackay (44) and Thorstein Veblen (29) detect crowd-driven speculation or irrational exuberance. The contrast highlights a tension between those who prioritize fundamentals and those who stress caution or market psychology.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 89
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 83
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 80
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 75
Exceptional company quality by Fisher's standards
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 74
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 69
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 61
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 49
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 45
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 40
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 34
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 34
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 29
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 29
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 26
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 24
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 290 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 8 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
71.9%
Operating Margin
31.7%
Net Margin
20.5%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
13.5%
ROA
7.0%
ROIC
—
EPS
$5.65
Cash
$368.00M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
0.69
Debt/Equity
0.56
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 4.9.2026 | $0.220 |
| 8.6.2026 | $0.220 |
| 7.6.2026 | $0.220 |
| 9.3.2026 | $0.220 |
| 8.3.2026 | $0.220 |
| 26.12.2025 | $0.200 |
| 25.12.2025 | $0.200 |
| 17.10.2025 | $0.200 |
| 16.10.2025 | $0.200 |
| 18.7.2025 | $0.200 |
| 17.7.2025 | $0.200 |
| 17.4.2025 | $0.200 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$41.96
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$25.30
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 7 positive, 7 neutral, 6 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 30.9.2026
Yahoo · 29.9.2026
Yahoo · 28.9.2026
Yahoo · 28.9.2026
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
SM Energy Company (SM) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 49/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
SM currently scores 49/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
SM's technical score is 33/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Price is above the 200-day average; +28.3% over the last 3 months relative to the index.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 4.4% of price; Current ratio: 0.69; Calmar: -0.06 (3y annualized return -3.7% / max drawdown 66.7%).
Yes — SM has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 3 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Venkatraman Ashwin | Open Market Sale | 10.9.2026 | 12,525 | -3,650 | $38.28 |
| Lebeck James Barker | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 14,705 | -17,500 | $37.02 |
| PURSELL A WADE | Gift | 21.8.2026 | 426,531 | -5,000 | — |
| Lebeck James Barker | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 17,500 | -17,500 | $37.02 |
| PURSELL A WADE | Gift | 21.8.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | — |
| Lebeck James Barker | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 24.7.2026 | 7,520 | +7,520 | — |
| Bennett Alan D | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 7,288 | +7,288 | — |
| McKenna Blake Douglas | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 46,639 | +46,639 | — |
| PURSELL A WADE | Tax Withholding in Shares | 24.7.2026 | 7,403 | -7,403 | $26.10 |
| McDonald Elizabeth Anne | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 90,168 | +90,168 | — |
| Lebeck James Barker | Tax Withholding in Shares | 24.7.2026 | 3,291 | -3,291 | $26.10 |
| Lebeck James Barker | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 42,752 | +42,752 | — |
| PURSELL A WADE | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 54,412 | +54,412 | — |
| PURSELL A WADE | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 24.7.2026 | 16,917 | +16,917 | — |
| PURSELL A WADE | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 24.7.2026 | 438,934 | +16,917 | — |
| PURSELL A WADE | Tax Withholding in Shares | 24.7.2026 | 431,531 | -7,403 | $26.10 |
| PURSELL A WADE | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 54,412 | +54,412 | — |
| McDonald Elizabeth Anne | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 90,168 | +90,168 | — |
| Lebeck James Barker | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 24.7.2026 | 35,496 | +7,520 | — |
| Lebeck James Barker | Tax Withholding in Shares | 24.7.2026 | 32,205 | -3,291 | $26.10 |
| Lebeck James Barker | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 42,752 | +42,752 | — |
| Bennett Alan D | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 7,288 | +7,288 | — |
| McKenna Blake Douglas | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 46,639 | +46,639 | — |
| PURSELL A WADE | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 5,800 | -5,800 | $26.10 |
| PURSELL A WADE | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.7.2026 | 9,543 | +9,543 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
13,482,404 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 12,802,701 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
60.5% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 44.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology