Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· · NYSE
$153.16
▼ $0.18 (-0.1%)
Market data updated: 09/16 04:57 PM
News analyzed: 09/16/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$152.91 - $153.46
52-Week Range
$135.30 - $160.29
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
+9.9% (1Y)
⚠️ Insufficient data for a reliable StockIQ Score
Only 3 of 7 categories available — Fundamental, Growth, Valuation, Quality unavailable.
Strengths: 2/13 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 0.8% of price
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is below the 50-day average
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 1 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 1
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
SDY earns an overall investor score of 53, resulting in a MODERATE rating. This score reflects a conflict between strong media sentiment and low volatility against short-term technical weakness. In terms of technical indicators, which yield a category score of 33, SDY maintains long-term structural support by staying above its 200-day moving average and outperforming its benchmark index by 1.5% over the past three months. However, short-term momentum has turned lower: the price has fallen below its 50-day moving average and Parabolic SAR point, the 12-day Rate of Change is -1.9%, the MACD histogram is negative, the RSI shows a weak bias at 45.3, and the %K stochastic indicator sits in oversold territory at 10.3. Counterbalancing the technical pressures, the news category scores a perfect 100 based on neutral and positive sentiment surrounding dividend strategies for retirees, a broader comeback in value and small-cap stocks, and specific positive operational headlines regarding underlying holdings like Accenture. Finally, the risk profile receives a score of 58, supported by low daily price fluctuations with an Average True Range (ATR) of 0.9% of price. On a longer timeframe, SDY demonstrates a 3-year annualized return of 8.9% alongside a maximum drawdown of 15.6%, producing a Calmar ratio of 0.57. Together, these mixed inputs generate a balanced, middle-of-the-road score.
SDY remains above its 200-day moving average but trades below its 50-day average and SAR point, with a negative MACD histogram, an RSI of 45.3, and an oversold %K reading of 10.3.
Shorter-term price momentum has weakened significantly despite long-term support remaining intact.
News coverage registers maximum positive sentiment, driven by stories on retiree dividend ETF strategies, a small-cap/value rebound, and positive news on Accenture.
Favorable public narrative and sector positioning can help maintain investor demand despite technical pullbacks.
Daily price volatility is subdued with an ATR of 0.9% of price, while the 3-year Calmar ratio stands at 0.57 based on an 8.9% return and 15.6% drawdown.
Moderate historical drawdowns and low daily movement offer relative price stability for risk-conscious investors.
StockIQ conclusion
SDY receives a MODERATE rating with a score of 53, balancing weaker technical indicators against high news sentiment and low volatility. While the asset retains long-term support above its 200-day moving average, short-term metrics like a negative MACD histogram and a drop below the 50-day average show declining momentum. Investors should monitor technical trend reversals alongside market sector rotation.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
47
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
23
Risk
58
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of the State Street SPDR S&P Dividend ETF (SDY) has highlighted its appeal as a stable, low-maintenance investment option for retirees and income-focused investors. Articles emphasize its role in dividend-focused portfolios, particularly amid market shifts favoring value and small-cap stocks. While not exclusively about SDY, broader trends—such as rising interest in high-dividend ETFs and investor interest in dividend strategies—suggest SDY remains a relevant choice for conservative investors seeking steady yields. No direct SDY-specific controversies or major changes were reported.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about State Street SPDR S&P Dividend ETF. News trend score: 100. Reason: 13 of the last 19 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
17
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
88
Fundamentals
—
Technical
23
Valuation
—
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+2%
Market Narrative
61
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+11
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant anchoring behavior suggests traders are fixating on the 1.7% proximity to support, possibly treating it as a hard floor. The extreme positive sentiment (100/100) contrasts sharply with weak momentum and neutral RSI, indicating euphoria may be detached from price action. The narrative gap (12 points) hints at a disconnect between market expectations and reality, but anchoring remains the most observable bias. The key question: will traders break the 1.7% anchor, or will sentiment-driven buying sustain the current level?
Updated: 09/09/2026, 07:28 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"‘5 Safest Dividend ETFs Retirees Can Buy in August and Hold Forever’"
"‘Baby Boomers Should Move to These 5 Safe Dividend ETFs Before September’"
"‘Here Are 5 ETFs That Retirees Use to Skip Stock Picking Entirely’"
"‘Value stocks and small companies are outperforming... according to a set of ETFs’"
📈 7D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Morgan Housel — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 39/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on the documented principles of each methodology, the model estimates that investors who emphasize long‑term dividend compounding and cycle positioning—such as Morgan Housel (score 100) and Samuel Armstrong Nelson (score 96)—view SDY very favorably, while those focused on capital preservation and crowd sentiment—like Gerald Loeb (score 74) and Charles Mackay (score 71)—assign moderately positive but less enthusiastic ratings. In contrast, a large group of value‑oriented frameworks (Graham, Fisher, Lynch, Marks, Bagehot, Veblen, etc.) receive neutral 50‑point scores largely because the required balance‑sheet, growth, or valuation data are missing, resulting in “not enough data” verdicts. The efficient‑market view (score 49) and Marks’ market‑cycle lens (score 48) deem the evidence for an edge weak or mixed, reflecting uncertainty about whether expectations are already priced in. Finally, Jesse Livermore’s trend‑following rule yields a low score of 38, indicating a negative price trend that conflicts with his core trading principle.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 100
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 92
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 74
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 71
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 51
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 50
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 50
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 48
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 39
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 275 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 9 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
A pattern consistent with an early/mid distribution phase — a trading range after an advance with declining volume.
Medium confidence
$152.23
Range Bottom
$160.29
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 22.6.2026 | $0.968 |
| 23.3.2026 | $0.874 |
| 22.12.2025 | $1.017 |
| 22.9.2025 | $0.871 |
| 23.6.2025 | $0.927 |
| 24.3.2025 | $0.818 |
| 20.12.2024 | $1.030 |
| 20.9.2024 | $0.785 |
| 21.6.2024 | $0.859 |
| 15.3.2024 | $0.708 |
| 15.12.2023 | $0.978 |
| 15.9.2023 | $0.793 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 13 positive, 6 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 19 articles.
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 4.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 28.8.2026
Benzinga · 27.8.2026
Benzinga · 25.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 24.8.2026
Zacks · 19.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 12.8.2026
Zacks · 10.8.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 7.8.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 4.8.2026
Zacks · 28.7.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 23.7.2026
Zacks · 8.7.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 2.7.2026
MarketBeat · 2.7.2026
Zacks · 15.6.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for State Street SPDR S&P Dividend ETF (SDY) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for SDY specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
SDY's technical score is 23/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 0.8% of price; Price is above the 200-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is below the 50-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; -1.1% over the last 3 months relative to the index.
Yes — SDY has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 0 filings.
No recent insider transaction filings found for this stock.
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
21,821 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 30,287 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
27.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 17.7% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology