Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Basic Materials · ·
$201.30
▼ $2.62 (-1.3%)
Market data updated: 09/28 04:20 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/28/2026
News analyzed: 09/28/2026
Market Cap
$167.95B
Day Range
$196.00 - $202.97
52-Week Range
$114.69 - $220.78
Beta
—
Next Earnings
26.10.2026
Support
$167.05
Resistance
$220.78
SCCO is a stock from the Materials sector — Mining, chemicals, and metals — the raw materials that feed other industries, sensitive to commodity prices.
+79.5% (1Y)
Strengths: 17/31 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 24.5%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $75.17 vs. price $201.30 (-62.7%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (73/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (33/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 1 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 1
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
66
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
73
Quality
58
Value
33
Momentum
71
Risk
56
Sentiment
80
Fundamental
79
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent coverage of Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) highlighted its stock falling sharply—about 7%—as copper prices retreated from record highs and doubts grew over a potential U.S. copper tariff. Articles noted the dip outpaced the broader market, while analysts flagged SCCO as a trending name, offering facts for investors to consider amid the tariff‑policy uncertainty and commodity‑market volatility.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Southern Copper Corporation. News trend score: 80. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
32
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
41
Psychology
45
Fundamentals
79
Technical
71
Valuation
33
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+20%
Market Narrative
66
Fundamental Reality
41
Narrative Gap
+25
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
SCCO’s psychology is dominated by overconfidence, as momentum and valuation far outpace fundamentals, suggesting investors may be overestimating growth potential. The euphoria score (46) and FOMO (31) reinforce detached optimism, while the narrative gap (36) hints at a disconnect between market perception and underlying reality. The key question: *Will traders remain anchored to recent highs, or will valuation discrepancies eventually test confidence?* The lack of panic or herding implies no immediate collective reckoning, but the extreme valuation gap could act as a future pressure point.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 03:48 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"‘Copper surges as shifting trade policy and AI demand collide’ (MarketBeat)"
"‘Southern Copper (SCCO) Exceeds Market Returns’ (Zacks)"
"‘Can Southern Copper's Investment Plan Fuel Long-Term Output Growth?’ (Zacks)"
"‘Southern Copper Stock Pauses After Teasing Investors’ (Investor's Business Daily)"
📈 6D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 90/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jack Schwager — 17/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on Walter Bagehot’s documented focus on liquidity, the model estimates that SCCO would likely survive a credit squeeze, giving it a high score. Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s cycle‑oriented framework also yields a favorable rating because the stock appears nearer to oversold levels, while Edgar Lawrence Smith’s long‑term hold perspective rates it as a candidate for a decade‑long investment. In contrast, Philip Fisher’s quality criteria and Peter Lynch’s price‑reflective analysis assign lower scores, describing the firm as solid but not exceptional and noting that much of its growth is already priced in. More cautious investors such as Howard Marks, Benjamin Graham, and Jack Schwager apply stricter risk and valuation lenses, resulting in low scores that flag caution, moderate risk, or outright avoidance. These divergent outcomes arise because each methodology weighs liquidity, cycle positioning, growth quality, valuation, and risk differently, leading to a wide spread of conclusions about the same stock.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 90
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 82
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 71
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 61
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 59
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 54
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 52
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 48
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 46
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 45
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 39
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 35
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 30
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 25
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 17
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 265 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (6 bullish · 3 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
60.1%
Operating Margin
52.2%
Net Margin
32.4%
EBITDA Margin
58.6%
ROE
39.4%
ROA
20.3%
ROIC
—
EPS
$5.24
Cash
$4.30B
Total Debt
$6.75B
Current Ratio
3.89
Debt/Equity
0.61
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 11.8.2026 | $1.087 |
| 13.5.2026 | $0.978 |
| 10.2.2026 | $0.971 |
| 12.11.2025 | $0.866 |
| 15.8.2025 | $0.763 |
| 2.5.2025 | $0.661 |
| 11.2.2025 | $0.657 |
| 6.11.2024 | $0.658 |
| 9.8.2024 | $0.561 |
| 12.2.2024 | $0.748 |
| 7.11.2023 | $0.935 |
| 8.8.2023 | $0.935 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$201.30
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$75.17
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-62.7%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
10.5%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.5% | $3.79B | $3.47B |
| 2 | 8.5% | $4.11B | $3.46B |
| 3 | 6.5% | $4.37B | $3.38B |
| 4 | 4.5% | $4.57B | $3.24B |
| 5 | 2.5% | $4.68B | $3.04B |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$3.43B
Terminal Value
$73.85B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$48.00B
Enterprise Value
$64.58B
Net Debt
$2.45B
Equity Value
$62.14B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$13.35
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$13.28
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 9 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
ChartMill · 26.9.2026
Yahoo · 26.9.2026
Yahoo · 26.9.2026
Yahoo · 25.9.2026
Zacks · 25.9.2026
Yahoo · 24.9.2026
Zacks · 24.9.2026
Zacks · 24.9.2026
Yahoo · 24.9.2026
Benzinga · 23.9.2026
Benzinga · 22.9.2026
Zacks · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
CNW Group · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
Zacks · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Trefis · 11.9.2026
Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 66/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
SCCO currently scores 66/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, SCCO's estimated fair value is $75.17, which is 62.7% below the current price of $201.30. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
SCCO's technical score is 71/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 24.5%; Net income growth: 28.3%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $75.17 vs. price $201.30 (-62.7%); P/E: 38.9; ROC 12 days: -2.6%.
Yes — SCCO has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 16 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PALOMINO BONILLA LUIS MIGUEL | Open Market Sale | 24.9.2026 | 1,503 | -100 | $200.00 |
| PALOMINO BONILLA LUIS MIGUEL | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 1,503 | -100 | $210.00 |
| PALOMINO BONILLA LUIS MIGUEL | Open Market Sale | 8.9.2026 | 100 | -100 | $210.00 |
| PALOMINO BONILLA LUIS MIGUEL | Open Market Sale | 4.9.2026 | 1,603 | -100 | $200.00 |
| PALOMINO BONILLA LUIS MIGUEL | Open Market Sale | 4.9.2026 | 100 | -100 | $200.00 |
| PALOMINO BONILLA LUIS MIGUEL | Open Market Sale | 31.8.2026 | 1,303 | -400 | $217.50 |
| PALOMINO BONILLA LUIS MIGUEL | Open Market Sale | 31.8.2026 | 1,703 | +0 | — |
| PALOMINO BONILLA LUIS MIGUEL | Open Market Sale | 31.8.2026 | 400 | -400 | $217.50 |
| PALOMINO BONILLA LUIS MIGUEL | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 1,703 | -100 | $200.00 |
| PALOMINO BONILLA LUIS MIGUEL | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 1,803 | -100 | $198.30 |
| PALOMINO BONILLA LUIS MIGUEL | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 100 | -100 | $200.00 |
| PALOMINO BONILLA LUIS MIGUEL | Open Market Sale | 5.8.2026 | 100 | -100 | $198.30 |
| PALOMINO BONILLA LUIS MIGUEL | Open Market Sale | 4.8.2026 | 1,903 | -100 | $195.00 |
| PALOMINO BONILLA LUIS MIGUEL | Open Market Sale | 4.8.2026 | 100 | -100 | $195.00 |
| Contreras Lerdo de Tejada Leonardo | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 1,400 | +400 | — |
| Castillo Sanchez Mejorada Enrique | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 1,400 | +400 | — |
| ARIZTEGUI ANDREVE VICENTE | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 11,070 | +400 | — |
| Arrigunaga Gomez del Campo Javier | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 5,548 | +400 | — |
| VELASCO GERMAN LARREA MOTA | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 404,926 | +400 | — |
| SACRISTAN CARLOS RUIZ | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 29,047 | +400 | — |
| PALOMINO BONILLA LUIS MIGUEL | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 2,003 | +400 | — |
| PALOMINO BONILLA LUIS MIGUEL | Open Market Sale | 24.7.2026 | 1,603 | -100 | $179.00 |
| Valenzuela Rionda Jose Pedro | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 5,548 | +400 | — |
| PALOMINO BONILLA LUIS MIGUEL | Open Market Sale | 24.7.2026 | 100 | -100 | $179.00 |
| Valenzuela Rionda Jose Pedro | Grant/Award from Employer | 24.7.2026 | 400 | +400 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
10,320,349 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 10,600,979 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
62.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 63.1% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology