Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· · NASDAQ
$57.98
▲ $0.08 (+0.1%)
Market data updated: 09/15 07:14 PM
News analyzed: 09/15/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$57.54 - $58.18
52-Week Range
$44.01 - $60.97
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
+13.3% (1Y)
⚠️ Insufficient data for a reliable StockIQ Score
Only 3 of 7 categories available — Fundamental, Growth, Valuation, Quality unavailable.
Strengths: 4/13 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 1.6% of price
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.42 (3y annualized return 11.6% / max drawdown 27.7%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
ROBT’s overall investor score of 66 reflects a mixed technical and risk profile, tempered by a strong news sentiment. The stock demonstrates moderate technical strength, with its price remaining above both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages—a positive signal for longer-term momentum. However, the MACD histogram’s negative reading and the price’s position below the SAR point indicate a weakening trend, while the RSI (52.5) suggests only neutral momentum. Risk metrics are a notable concern, particularly the Calmar ratio of 0.40, which highlights a historically volatile performance with a 27.7% max drawdown despite a 11.0% annualized return over three years. The ATR (1.6% of price) further underscores relative stability, but the risk profile remains elevated. Meanwhile, the news category scores perfectly at 100, driven by a blend of neutral and positive coverage around AI, semiconductor growth, and macroeconomic trends, which could signal broader tailwinds for the sector—though this does not directly translate to ROBT’s individual performance.
The stock’s price sits above key moving averages (50-day and 200-day), but momentum indicators like the MACD histogram are negative, and the price is below the SAR point, signaling a potential downtrend despite neutral RSI levels.
These technical signals are critical for assessing short-to-medium-term price direction and volatility, directly impacting investor confidence in the stock’s stability.
All five news items are either neutral or positive, emphasizing themes like AI, semiconductor growth, and macroeconomic resilience, which could indirectly benefit ROBT’s sector but do not directly reflect its stock-specific performance.
Positive news sentiment can drive broader market optimism, potentially supporting the stock’s valuation, but it does not guarantee individual stock performance or mitigate technical or risk-related weaknesses.
The Calmar ratio of 0.40 indicates a high-risk profile, with a significant max drawdown (27.7%) relative to its 3-year annualized return (11.0%), while the ATR suggests moderate volatility.
A low Calmar ratio signals that the stock may experience sharp drawdowns, which could deter risk-averse investors despite its returns.
StockIQ conclusion
ROBT exhibits a balanced but cautious profile, with technical indicators showing mixed signals—strong moving averages counterbalanced by weakening momentum and downtrend warnings. The risk profile remains elevated due to volatility and drawdown history, though positive news sentiment around AI and semiconductors provides a tailwind. Investors should monitor technical reversals, particularly in the MACD and SAR readings, as well as any sector-specific catalysts that could shift the stock’s trajectory. While the stock is not without potential, its current data suggests a need for cautious optimism.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
62
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
49
Risk
50
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of the **First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence and Robotics ETF** reflects broader industry trends rather than direct company-specific updates. Headlines highlight the growing influence of AI and robotics in tech markets, emphasizing themes like **semiconductor demand driven by AI infrastructure**, rising corporate debt for AI-related investments, and shifting investor scrutiny amid sector volatility. The focus also includes **agentic AI adoption in finance**, uneven economic recovery in tech, and the expanding value chain of AI-related industries, with winners emerging amid supply constraints. No direct details about the ETF’s performance or holdings are provided.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence and Robotics ETF. News trend score: 100. Reason: 13 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
19
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
22
Fundamentals
—
Technical
49
Valuation
—
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+4%
Market Narrative
62
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+12
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for ROBT suggests a dominant psychological tension between euphoric overvaluation (+10.5% above 200-day average) and anchoring near resistance (3.5% away). The absence of panic or herding signals—despite elevated volume—implies a measured, not frantic, response. The narrative gap (13 points) hints at a disconnect where optimism may outpace tangible fundamentals. The key question: will traders hold near resistance or pivot if momentum fails to confirm the overbought RSI (53)?
Updated: 09/06/2026, 04:40 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"hundreds of billions in corporate borrowing are piling up to finance a gargantuan AI data center infrastructure buildout"
"more than half (52%) of respondents are already piloting agentic AI or are at more advanced deployment stages"
"AI-influenced stocks continued to headline the Q2 earnings season, which impressed across all metrics"
"AI is becoming a visible source of macroeconomic resilience, especially in the US"
📈 6D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Morgan Housel — 81/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jack Schwager — 25/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for ROBT reflects deep methodological differences in how these investors evaluate stocks. Morgan Housel’s high score (80) suggests this stock aligns with his patient, long-term compounding philosophy, where steady growth and resilience matter most—even if data is sparse. Meanwhile, Samuel Nelson’s moderate score (72) sees potential in the stock’s cyclical positioning, favoring it as oversold rather than overbought, while Gerald Loeb’s cautious stance (63) flags moderate risk, reflecting his preference for capital preservation. At the opposite end, methodologies like Jesse Livermore’s (44) and Jack Schwager’s (30) outright reject the stock, with Livermore’s trend-following discipline and Schwager’s lack of clear setup overriding any other signals. Meanwhile, the near-unanimous ‘not enough data’ verdicts from Graham, Fisher, and Lynch highlight how fundamental gaps in valuation or growth metrics leave these value- and growth-oriented approaches unable to form a definitive opinion.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 81
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 79
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 64
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 63
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 43
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 42
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 41
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 37
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 25
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 273 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 5 bearish · 3 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 25.6.2026 | $0.009 |
| 13.12.2024 | $0.223 |
| 27.6.2024 | $0.084 |
| 22.12.2023 | $0.030 |
| 27.6.2023 | $0.066 |
| 24.3.2023 | $0.011 |
| 23.12.2022 | $0.054 |
| 24.6.2022 | $0.068 |
| 25.3.2022 | $0.005 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 13 positive, 6 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 12.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Zacks · 4.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 4.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 3.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 3.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 2.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 1.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 31.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 29.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 29.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 29.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 28.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 27.8.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence and Robotics ETF (ROBT) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for ROBT specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
ROBT's technical score is 49/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 1.6% of price; Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.42 (3y annualized return 11.6% / max drawdown 27.7%); MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; Price is below the SAR point — downtrend.
Yes — ROBT has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 0 filings.
No recent insider transaction filings found for this stock.
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
23,606 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 34,137 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
28.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 35.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology