Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$240.32
▼ $12.17 (-4.8%)
Market data updated: 09/29 12:04 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/29/2026
News analyzed: 09/29/2026
Market Cap
$20.36B
Day Range
$239.61 - $246.94
52-Week Range
$168.88 - $306.25
Beta
—
Next Earnings
03.11.2026
Support
$186.33
Resistance
$271.43
RGLD is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
+30.7% (1Y)
Strengths: 18/29 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Golden Cross
SMA 50 recently crossed above SMA 200
Technical
Biggest negative driver
MACD
MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum
Technical
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (74/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (45/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
70
Today
72
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🔎 What Changed (vs. 30 days ago)
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 26, 2026
Then
72
$267.76
Now
70
$240.32
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
74
Quality
63
Value
45
Momentum
74
Risk
62
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
69
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Royal Gold, Inc. highlights its status as a leading precious metals royalty company, particularly in copper and gold, amid broader market trends favoring metals. Analysts emphasize its strong revenue and cash flow growth, positioning it as a growth play with a reasonable valuation despite a recent stock rally. The company’s participation in investor roadshows underscores investor interest, while broader themes like de-dollarization and geopolitical risks driving gold demand are noted. Overall, Royal Gold is seen as a solid but no longer ultra-cheap investment.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Royal Gold, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 12 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
17
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
43
Psychology
38
Fundamentals
69
Technical
74
Valuation
45
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+21%
Market Narrative
60
Fundamental Reality
43
Narrative Gap
+17
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests a narrative-reality gap (71 vs. 43) where extreme sentiment (100/100) and momentum-driven euphoria (score 35) coexist with anchoring near resistance (3.6% away). Herding (dominant at 41) reflects peer alignment, while overconfidence (13) hints at detached valuation from fundamentals. The key question: *Will traders anchor to resistance or break out, or will the gap widen as euphoria persists?* The absence of panic or loss aversion signals suggests no imminent defensive shift.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 05:06 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Gold just rallied by over 10% after falling into correction territory earlier this year."
"Skip the Mine, Pocket the Gold: 5 Royalty Streamers Are Crushing Producers in 2026"
"Royal Gold stock remains a 'Buy' thanks to surging revenue and cash flow."
"Royal Gold is rated HOLD due to general valuation after a 28% stock run-up."
📈 9D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jack Schwager — 25/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock splits methodologies into two stark camps: the bullish, long-term-oriented investors and the cautious or skeptical ones. Walter Bagehot, Edgar Lawrence Smith, and Philip Fisher all rate it near the top, praising its liquidity, quality, and potential for decade-long holding—suggesting a resilient, high-quality business with room to compound. Meanwhile, Peter Lynch also leans positive but with a growth-focused twist, while the middle tier (Loeb, Housel) sees it as a steady, patient-friendly play. However, the lower-scoring group—from Livermore’s indecision to Marks’ mixed verdict, Bogle’s skepticism, and Nelson’s overbought warning—questions whether the stock’s strengths justify its valuation or if it’s already priced for perfection. The divide hinges on whether the model assumes the stock’s fundamentals (like liquidity or quality) are undervalued or if market expectations have already baked in its potential risks.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 94
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 93
Exceptional company quality by Fisher's standards
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 82
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 71
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 65
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 63
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 62
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 57
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 50
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 49
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 49
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 44
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 40
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 25
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 286 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (6 bullish · 2 bearish · 3 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
69.3%
Operating Margin
61.9%
Net Margin
45.2%
EBITDA Margin
79.1%
ROE
6.5%
ROA
4.9%
ROIC
—
EPS
$6.70
Cash
$233.72M
Total Debt
$895.44M
Current Ratio
3.12
Debt/Equity
0.13
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 2.7.2026 | $0.475 |
| 1.7.2026 | $0.475 |
| 2.4.2026 | $0.475 |
| 1.4.2026 | $0.475 |
| 2.1.2026 | $0.475 |
| 1.1.2026 | $0.475 |
| 3.10.2025 | $0.450 |
| 2.10.2025 | $0.450 |
| 3.7.2025 | $0.450 |
| 2.7.2025 | $0.450 |
| 4.4.2025 | $0.450 |
| 3.4.2025 | $0.450 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$102.89
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$102.89
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 12 positive, 6 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 28.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 28.9.2026
Yahoo · 28.9.2026
Benzinga · 28.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 26.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 25.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 25.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 24.9.2026
ChartMill · 24.9.2026
Business Wire · 23.9.2026
Yahoo · 23.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 17.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Zacks · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
MT Newswires · 16.9.2026
TMX Newsfile · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 70/100, rated "Strong". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
RGLD currently scores 70/100 (Strong) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
RGLD's technical score is 74/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: SMA 50 recently crossed above SMA 200; Revenue growth (last year): 43.2%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 32.7%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; P/E: 35.9; ROC 12 days: -3.8%.
Yes — RGLD has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 20 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raffield Martin | Tax Withholding in Shares | 14.9.2026 | 10,996 | -27 | $248.34 |
| Raffield Martin | Gift | 11.9.2026 | 11,023 | -40 | — |
| Raffield Martin | Gift | 11.9.2026 | 40 | -40 | — |
| Heissenbuttel William Holmes | Open Market Sale | 3.9.2026 | 124,740 | -57 | $259.98 |
| Heissenbuttel William Holmes | Open Market Sale | 3.9.2026 | 121,082 | -1,173 | $263.53 |
| Heissenbuttel William Holmes | Open Market Sale | 3.9.2026 | 123,132 | -1,608 | $261.31 |
| Heissenbuttel William Holmes | Open Market Sale | 3.9.2026 | 122,255 | -877 | $262.31 |
| Heissenbuttel William Holmes | Open Market Sale | 3.9.2026 | 117,522 | -3,560 | $264.59 |
| Heissenbuttel William Holmes | Open Market Sale | 3.9.2026 | 1,608 | -1,608 | $261.31 |
| Heissenbuttel William Holmes | Open Market Sale | 3.9.2026 | 1,173 | -1,173 | $263.53 |
| Heissenbuttel William Holmes | Open Market Sale | 3.9.2026 | 57 | -57 | $259.98 |
| Heissenbuttel William Holmes | Open Market Sale | 3.9.2026 | 877 | -877 | $262.31 |
| Heissenbuttel William Holmes | Open Market Sale | 3.9.2026 | 3,560 | -3,560 | $264.59 |
| Shefman Randy | Open Market Sale | 28.8.2026 | 500 | -500 | $262.80 |
| Shefman Randy | Open Market Sale | 28.8.2026 | 8,082 | -500 | $262.80 |
| Shefman Randy | Open Market Sale | 16.6.2026 | 500 | -500 | $215.85 |
| Shefman Randy | Open Market Sale | 16.6.2026 | 8,582 | -500 | $215.85 |
| Shefman Randy | Open Market Sale | 11.5.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | $243.74 |
| Shefman Randy | Open Market Sale | 11.5.2026 | 9,082 | -1,000 | $243.74 |
| Isto Mark | Open Market Sale | 12.3.2026 | 2,000 | -2,000 | $274.83 |
| Isto Mark | Open Market Sale | 12.3.2026 | 20,043 | -2,000 | $274.83 |
| Crandall David R | Gift | 11.3.2026 | 150 | -150 | — |
| Crandall David R | Gift | 11.3.2026 | 4,282 | -150 | — |
| Libner Paul | Open Market Sale | 4.3.2026 | 100 | -100 | $284.41 |
| Libner Paul | Open Market Sale | 4.3.2026 | 700 | -700 | $281.42 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
2,218,686 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 2,575,154 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
49.5% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 53.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology