Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Real Estate · ·
$10.88
▼ $0.10 (-0.9%)
Market data updated: 09/21 04:33 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/21/2026
Market Cap
$278.76M
Day Range
$10.84 - $11.16
52-Week Range
$9.69 - $13.49
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.11.2026
Support
$9.69
Resistance
$11.33
REFI is a stock from the Real Estate sector — REITs and real-estate companies — highly sensitive to interest rates and property prices.
-19.9% (1Y)
Strengths: 13/23 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Leverage risk
Debt/equity: 0.16
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: -0.25 (3y annualized return -11.0% / max drawdown 44.1%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
61
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
38
Quality
55
Value
60
Momentum
68
Risk
48
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
59
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. (REFI/LIEN) has primarily focused on its **strong Q2 2026 financial performance**, highlighting **exceptional credit quality**—including zero non-accruals and 100% senior-secured exposure—alongside analyst optimism about its merger potential. Insider stock purchases were also noted, while one analyst slightly lowered their price target to $16 while maintaining a "Market Outperform" rating. The focus remains on stability and strategic positioning in the real estate finance sector.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc.. News trend score: 92. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
38
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
52
Psychology
53
Fundamentals
59
Technical
68
Valuation
60
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-4%
Market Narrative
63
Fundamental Reality
52
Narrative Gap
+11
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests a **relative strength bias**—FOMO and herding dominate as REFI outperforms peers while maintaining positive momentum. Overconfidence hints at potential mispricing, but euphoria remains muted due to modest valuation and RSI. The narrative gap (11 points) implies traders may be overestimating fundamentals relative to technicals. The key question: *Will momentum sustain, or will traders pivot if peers rally further?*
Updated: 09/05/2026, 08:16 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Q2 credit quality remained strong, with 0% non-accruals and 100% senior-secured exposure"
"Citizens analyst maintains Chicago Atlantic Real (REFI) with a Market Outperform and lowers the price target"
📈 4D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Benjamin Graham — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Peter Lynch — 29/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between value-oriented and cyclical/crowd-sensitive methodologies. Benjamin Graham, Edgar Lawrence Smith, and even the Enterprising Graham model all rate it near-perfectly, seeing it as a long-term, undervalued gem—especially for patient, defensive investors. Meanwhile, growth-focused thinkers like Peter Lynch and Philip Fisher dismiss it outright due to insufficient fundamentals or growth justification, while cyclical skeptics like Samuel Armstrong Nelson and Jesse Livermore flag it as overbought or counter-trend. The middle ground—where investors like Howard Marks and Thorstein Veblen see potential but temper it with caution—reflects a stock that may have strong fundamentals but could already be priced for perfection, leaving only the most disciplined value hunters fully convinced.
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 100
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 89
Deep statistical discount — a real Enterprising Investor candidate
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 81
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 68
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 67
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 66
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 61
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 57
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 49
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 48
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 41
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 35
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 29
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (8 bullish · 3 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
—
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
11.7%
ROA
8.5%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.71
Cash
$14.95M
Total Debt
$49.33M
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
0.16
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 30.6.2026 | $0.470 |
| 31.3.2026 | $0.470 |
| 31.12.2025 | $0.470 |
| 30.9.2025 | $0.470 |
| 30.6.2025 | $0.470 |
| 31.3.2025 | $0.470 |
| 31.12.2024 | $0.650 |
| 30.9.2024 | $0.470 |
| 28.6.2024 | $0.470 |
| 27.3.2024 | $0.470 |
| 28.12.2023 | $0.760 |
| 28.9.2023 | $0.470 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$14.36
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$14.36
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 9 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 30.8.2026
MT Newswires · 19.8.2026
MT Newswires · 19.8.2026
Motley Fool · 18.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 13.8.2026
MarketBeat · 13.8.2026
Moby · 12.8.2026
Benzinga · 12.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 11.8.2026
MarketBeat · 11.8.2026
Zacks · 11.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 11.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 7.8.2026
Yahoo · 6.8.2026
Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. (REFI) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 61/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
REFI currently scores 61/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
REFI's technical score is 68/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Debt/equity: 0.16; Price is above the 50-day average; MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: -0.25 (3y annualized return -11.0% / max drawdown 44.1%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -10.6%; Net income growth: -2.8%.
Yes — REFI has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 11 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mazarakis John | Open Market Purchase | 27.8.2026 | 526,562 | +7,530 | $10.67 |
| Mazarakis John | Open Market Purchase | 27.8.2026 | 7,530 | +7,530 | $10.67 |
| Mazarakis John | Open Market Purchase | 26.8.2026 | 519,032 | +40,181 | $10.67 |
| Mazarakis John | Open Market Purchase | 26.8.2026 | 40,181 | +40,181 | $10.67 |
| Mazarakis John | Open Market Purchase | 21.8.2026 | 478,851 | +145 | $10.67 |
| Mazarakis John | Open Market Purchase | 21.8.2026 | 145 | +145 | $10.67 |
| Sack Peter | Open Market Purchase | 19.8.2026 | 2,000 | +2,000 | $10.39 |
| Sack Peter | Open Market Purchase | 19.8.2026 | 1,500 | +1,500 | $10.53 |
| Sack Peter | Open Market Purchase | 18.8.2026 | 1,500 | +1,500 | $10.43 |
| Cappell Anthony | Open Market Purchase | 17.8.2026 | 45,000 | +45,000 | $10.41 |
| Mazarakis John | Open Market Purchase | 17.8.2026 | 25,000 | +25,000 | $10.25 |
| Sack Peter | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.4.2026 | 37,099 | +37,099 | — |
| Papastavrou Jason D | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.4.2026 | 6,324 | +6,324 | — |
| Cappell Anthony | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.4.2026 | 37,099 | +37,099 | — |
| Mazarakis John | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.4.2026 | 37,099 | +37,099 | — |
| Stavola Elizabeth Mary | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.4.2026 | 6,324 | +6,324 | — |
| Silverman Phillip | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.4.2026 | 32,462 | +32,462 | — |
| Kite David | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.4.2026 | 37,099 | +37,099 | — |
| Konigsberg Brandon | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.4.2026 | 6,324 | +6,324 | — |
| Papastavrou Jason D | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.4.2026 | 55,870 | +6,324 | — |
| Mazarakis John | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.4.2026 | 453,706 | +37,099 | — |
| Sack Peter | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.4.2026 | 118,356 | +37,099 | — |
| Cappell Anthony | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.4.2026 | 421,706 | +37,099 | — |
| Stavola Elizabeth Mary | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.4.2026 | 6,324 | +6,324 | — |
| Silverman Phillip | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.4.2026 | 71,516 | +32,462 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,300,944 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 1,145,743 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
70.5% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 53.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology