Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· · NYSE
$46.75
▲ $0.12 (+0.3%)
Market data updated: 09/18 08:13 AM
News analyzed: 09/18/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$46.72 - $47.20
52-Week Range
$25.56 - $48.28
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
+66.9% (1Y)
⚠️ Insufficient data for a reliable StockIQ Score
Only 3 of 7 categories available — Fundamental, Growth, Valuation, Quality unavailable.
Strengths: 7/12 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.35 (3y annualized return 14.3% / max drawdown 41.5%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 1 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 1
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
PXJ exhibits a balanced profile with a strong technical foundation and mixed sentiment in news and risk metrics, contributing to its overall investor score of 79 and a 'STRONG' rating. The technical category dominates with a score of 91, driven by consistent bullish signals: the stock price remains above both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, indicating sustained uptrend strength. The MACD histogram’s positive trend and an RSI of 64.1 further validate healthy upward momentum, while the ATR of 1.9% suggests moderate volatility. However, the news category lags at 62, reflecting a split in sentiment—positive developments like energy sector reforms and bond yield insights are offset by broader macroeconomic concerns. Risk remains the weakest link at 50, primarily due to a high historical drawdown (41.5%) relative to its 3-year annualized return (16.1%), as captured by the Calmar ratio. This volatility risk underscores the need for cautious positioning despite the technical resilience.
The stock price is firmly above both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, with a positive MACD histogram and RSI of 64.1 indicating strong upward momentum. ATR stands at 1.9% of price, reflecting controlled volatility.
This technical alignment suggests a robust uptrend with low short-term volatility, reinforcing investor confidence in sustained price appreciation.
News sentiment is mixed, with positive coverage on energy sector reforms and bond yield trends, but offset by broader macroeconomic critiques. Five of six articles lean positive, though one highlights systemic debt risks.
The mixed news environment introduces uncertainty, as positive sector-specific developments may not fully offset broader economic concerns.
The Calmar ratio of 0.39 highlights a significant historical drawdown (41.5%) relative to a 3-year annualized return of 16.1%, while ATR remains low at 1.9%.
This risk profile indicates potential for sharp corrections, requiring careful risk management despite the current technical strength.
StockIQ conclusion
PXJ demonstrates a compelling technical profile with clear bullish signals and moderate volatility, supported by sector-specific positive news. However, its risk profile is weakened by a high historical drawdown and mixed macroeconomic sentiment, creating a cautious but cautiously optimistic outlook. Investors should monitor energy sector reforms and broader economic trends, as these could meaningfully alter the current balance between strength and vulnerability.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
68
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
12d ago · $47.39
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 25 to 51 day-over-day
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
73
Risk
42
Sentiment
68
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage on **Invesco Oil & Gas Services ETF** is limited, as the sources provided focus broadly on broader market trends rather than the ETF itself. The headlines instead highlight U.S. oil production fluctuations—such as a June increase driven by the Gulf of Mexico—rising oil prices near $90/bbl due to Middle East tensions, and macroeconomic shifts like higher Treasury yields and refinery demand misinterpretations. No direct ETF-specific news is available.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Invesco Oil & Gas Services ETF. News trend score: 68. Reason: 6 of the last 15 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
16
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
29
Fundamentals
—
Technical
73
Valuation
—
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+14%
Market Narrative
53
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+3
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant anchoring behavior—just 2.3% below resistance—suggests traders are fixating on this psychological barrier, limiting upside potential. Meanwhile, FOMO and euphoria signals (momentum, 200-day outperformance) indicate some speculative interest, but without panic or herding, the bias remains disciplined. The narrow narrative gap (1 point) implies no major disconnect between sentiment and fundamentals. The key question: will traders break resistance, or will anchoring hold as a ceiling?
Updated: 09/09/2026, 07:13 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Oil remains supported near $90/bbl by Middle East tensions and attacks on vessels in the Strait of Hormuz."
"U.S. June oil production increased by 37 kb/d... while U.S. May oil production drops"
"markets have remained remarkably resilient despite persistent macroeconomic uncertainty"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 7D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 67/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jack Schwager — 36/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark contrast in verdicts for PXJ reflects deep methodological divides between investors who prioritize patience and those who emphasize caution or market timing. Morgan Housel’s high score (70) suggests this stock aligns with his principles of quiet, long-term compounding, while Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s low score (20) flags it as overbought in a cycle, illustrating a tension between growth potential and market timing. Meanwhile, methodologies like Edgar Lawrence Smith (100) and Charles Mackay (63) either lack sufficient data or detect speculative momentum, whereas Benjamin Graham (50) and Philip Fisher (50) simply lack fundamental clarity. The divergence underscores whether the stock’s appeal lies in patient accumulation (Housel) or whether its risks—like stretched valuations (Marks-Cycle) or speculative hype (Mackay)—outweigh its merits.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 67
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 65
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 53
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 52
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 49
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 48
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 47
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 42
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 36
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 275 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (7 bullish · 2 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 22.6.2026 | $0.330 |
| 23.3.2026 | $0.207 |
| 22.12.2025 | $0.254 |
| 22.9.2025 | $0.220 |
| 23.6.2025 | $0.261 |
| 24.3.2025 | $0.118 |
| 23.12.2024 | $0.212 |
| 23.9.2024 | $0.264 |
| 24.6.2024 | $0.356 |
| 18.3.2024 | $0.097 |
| 18.12.2023 | $0.147 |
| 18.9.2023 | $0.206 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 6 positive, 6 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 15 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 7.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 4.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 23.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 21.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 21.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 19.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 17.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 6.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 6.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 30.7.2026
Barchart · 10.6.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Invesco Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for PXJ specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
PXJ's technical score is 73/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average; RSI 54.3 — healthy positive momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.35 (3y annualized return 14.3% / max drawdown 41.5%); MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; CMF 20 days: -0.07.
Yes — PXJ has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 0 filings.
No recent insider transaction filings found for this stock.
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
12,678 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 1,362 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
55.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 79.7% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology