Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$45.87
▲ $0.32 (+0.7%)
Market data updated: 09/19 05:48 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/18/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$1.06B
Day Range
$43.60 - $46.38
52-Week Range
$25.28 - $119.70
Beta
—
Next Earnings
04.11.2026
Support
$25.28
Resistance
$46.92
PSIX is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
-56.7% (1Y)
Strengths: 23/33 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 51.8%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $15.05 vs. price $45.87 (-67.2%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (68/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (43/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
as of 09/10/202671
This Week
70
7D Ago
→ +1
Stable
Technical
78
7D Ago: 72
↑ +6
Fundamental
80
7D Ago: 80
→ 0
Growth
68
7D Ago: 68
→ 0
Valuation
43
7D Ago: 43
→ 0
News
100
7D Ago: 100
→ 0
Quality
63
7D Ago: 63
→ 0
Risk
54
7D Ago: 54
→ 0
Biggest Improvements
📊 Score History
71
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
today · $45.87
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 64)
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
today · $45.87
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 37 to 70 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
⚖️ Base Case
71 / 100
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of September 10, 2026
Then
70
$42.08
Now
71
$45.87
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
68
Quality
63
Value
43
Momentum
78
Risk
54
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
80
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **Power Solutions International, Inc.** (PSIX) has primarily focused on its **Q2 2026 earnings call**, where the company was highlighted as a key growth driver for **Solaris Energy Infrastructure** and other industrial firms. While PSIX itself isn’t directly named in most headlines, its parent company **Dynamis Power Solutions** (via Business Wire, August 18) secured a **1.3GW power generation order** for data centers and energy markets, signaling expansion in critical infrastructure. The broader sector discussion revolves around industrial and energy solutions, with PSIX indirectly tied to profitability and market momentum in power supply and data center support.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Power Solutions International, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
63
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
43
Psychology
85
Fundamentals
80
Technical
78
Valuation
43
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+14%
Market Narrative
100
Fundamental Reality
43
Narrative Gap
+57
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests traders are overestimating PSIX’s momentum relative to fundamentals, with overconfidence (56) dominating. Extreme valuation (+169% DCF) and peer outperformance fuel herding, while FOMO and euphoria are secondary. The narrative gap (44) indicates traders may be ignoring downside risks. The key question: *Can momentum sustain without fundamental validation?*
Updated: 09/07/2026, 07:37 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Accelerated Mobile Power expands fleet by 1.3GW through Dynamis Power Solutions’ order for data centers and energy market"
"Power Solutions International Q2 2026 earnings call highlights revenue growth and profitability"
"Innovate (VATE) shares rose 60.6% on Q2 earnings report, reflecting strong industrials sector performance"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 96/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 4/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on Peter Lynch's growth focus and Walter Bagehot's liquidity emphasis, the model estimates a strong positive view (scores of 96) for PSIX, seeing growth not yet priced in and solid liquidity. In contrast, value‑oriented investors such as Graham, Fisher, and Loeb assign moderate scores in the mid‑50s to high‑50s, indicating the stock only partially meets their criteria for margin of safety or exceptional quality. Cycle‑sensitive frameworks from Howard Marks and the market‑efficiency perspective of Malkiel & Bogle produce middling to low scores, reflecting concerns about valuation, cycle position, and limited edge over an index. More contrarian or pattern‑recognition approaches like Mackay, Schwager, Housel, and Nelson give the lowest scores, flagging potential crowd delusion, volatility, or an overbought condition.
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 96
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 96
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 73
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 71
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 59
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 57
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 55
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 54
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 50
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 49
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 46
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 43
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 38
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 36
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 31
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 4
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (9 bullish · 2 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
25.6%
Operating Margin
15.2%
Net Margin
15.8%
EBITDA Margin
15.2%
ROE
63.8%
ROA
26.8%
ROIC
—
EPS
$4.95
Cash
$41.25M
Total Debt
$38.00K
Current Ratio
3.15
Debt/Equity
0.00
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$45.87
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$15.05
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-67.2%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
16.9%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16.9% | $16.54M | $15.17M |
| 2 | 13.3% | $18.74M | $15.77M |
| 3 | 9.7% | $20.56M | $15.88M |
| 4 | 6.1% | $21.82M | $15.46M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $22.36M | $14.54M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$14.14M
Terminal Value
$352.68M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$229.22M
Enterprise Value
$306.03M
Net Debt
$-41.21M
Equity Value
$347.24M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$7.74
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$6.40
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 9 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Motley Fool · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Zacks · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Zacks · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 26.8.2026
Zacks · 26.8.2026
Zacks · 18.8.2026
Business Wire · 18.8.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 15.8.2026
Business Wire · 14.8.2026
Motley Fool · 14.8.2026
Zacks · 13.8.2026
Moby · 12.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 12.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 11.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 7.8.2026
Moby · 7.8.2026
Zacks · 7.8.2026
Power Solutions International, Inc. (PSIX) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 71/100, rated "Strong". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
PSIX currently scores 71/100 (Strong) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, PSIX's estimated fair value is $15.05, which is 67.2% below the current price of $45.87. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
PSIX's technical score is 78/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 51.8%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 64.1%; Net income growth: 64.5%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $15.05 vs. price $45.87 (-67.2%); ATR: 5.7% of price; Free cash flow growth: -75.5%.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for PSIX.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 6 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hu Nan (Richard) | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.8.2026 | 5,867 | +5,867 | — |
| Li Xun | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.3.2026 | 1,665 | +1,665 | — |
| Du Zhaoying | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.3.2026 | 1,492 | +1,492 | — |
| Du Zhaoying | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.3.2026 | 1,492 | +1,492 | — |
| Li Xun | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.3.2026 | 1,665 | +1,665 | — |
| Li Xun | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.2.2026 | 7,500 | -7,500 | — |
| Li Xun | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.2.2026 | 7,500 | +7,500 | $2.00 |
| Li Xun | Tax Withholding in Shares | 12.2.2026 | 3,429 | -3,429 | $92.72 |
| Li Xun | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.2.2026 | 8,021 | +7,500 | $2.00 |
| Li Xun | Tax Withholding in Shares | 12.2.2026 | 4,592 | -3,429 | $92.72 |
| Li Xun | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 12.2.2026 | 7,500 | -7,500 | — |
| Du Zhaoying | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.12.2025 | 700 | +700 | — |
| He Hong | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.12.2025 | 5,000 | +5,000 | — |
| Shea Courtney C. | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.12.2025 | 5,000 | +5,000 | — |
| SIMPKINS FRANK P | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.12.2025 | 5,000 | +5,000 | — |
| Shea Courtney C. | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.12.2025 | 5,000 | +5,000 | — |
| Du Zhaoying | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.12.2025 | 700 | +700 | — |
| SIMPKINS FRANK P | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.12.2025 | 30,000 | +5,000 | — |
| He Hong | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.12.2025 | 23,750 | +5,000 | — |
| He Hong | Open Market Sale | 11.9.2025 | 1,500 | -1,500 | $94.00 |
| Weichai America Corp. | Open Market Sale | 11.9.2025 | 19,351 | -19,351 | $92.46 |
| Weichai America Corp. | Open Market Sale | 11.9.2025 | 23,231 | -23,231 | $93.64 |
| Weichai America Corp. | Open Market Sale | 11.9.2025 | 6,738 | -6,738 | $91.72 |
| Weichai America Corp. | Open Market Sale | 11.9.2025 | 30,519 | -30,519 | $94.33 |
| He Hong | Open Market Sale | 11.9.2025 | 18,750 | -1,500 | $94.00 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,728,564 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 1,963,145 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
53.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 58.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology